|
-- Deep fried okra 08:57, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tareq Salahi has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 07:18, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
There’s no reason to have undone this edit. You didn’t even provide me with a response. Simult2018 ( talk) 07:22, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
I don’t owe any editors an apology. If my edits were wrong, then you need to correct the page covering the 2009 security breach at the White House. That page (thanks to others, not me) has these facts. And there has been no explanation as to why the bot claims to do routine/tedious edits, but has delved I to things that would require judgement as to if it is “loaded” or “negative” — things requiring human judgement.
Are there bots operated by PR companies? Can’t imagine they wouldn’t try such a thing. Simult2018 ( talk) 09:06, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
And also, on the question “why would you expect a tool to talk to you” the answer is that if it did talk to me by sending me a message saying it undid my edit, and if it put the accusation in the edit line that the edit was vandalism, then it is reasonable for me to think it could explain itself to me when it posts to my page. Simult2018 ( talk) 09:08, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Doug Weller talk 09:28, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
|
-- Deep fried okra 08:57, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tareq Salahi has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 07:18, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
There’s no reason to have undone this edit. You didn’t even provide me with a response. Simult2018 ( talk) 07:22, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
I don’t owe any editors an apology. If my edits were wrong, then you need to correct the page covering the 2009 security breach at the White House. That page (thanks to others, not me) has these facts. And there has been no explanation as to why the bot claims to do routine/tedious edits, but has delved I to things that would require judgement as to if it is “loaded” or “negative” — things requiring human judgement.
Are there bots operated by PR companies? Can’t imagine they wouldn’t try such a thing. Simult2018 ( talk) 09:06, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
And also, on the question “why would you expect a tool to talk to you” the answer is that if it did talk to me by sending me a message saying it undid my edit, and if it put the accusation in the edit line that the edit was vandalism, then it is reasonable for me to think it could explain itself to me when it posts to my page. Simult2018 ( talk) 09:08, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Doug Weller talk 09:28, 19 January 2020 (UTC)