Deprod notification: Danny Pacheco
I've removed the PROD from this article, which you added a {{ prod-2}} to, as it had already been deleted via the PROD process once – I've nominated it for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Pacheco. — Snigbrook 13:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for that revert, there must have been an error with wikipedia since I was undoing the damage done to the main page (which someone has now taken care off as well) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Curuxz ( talk • contribs) 09:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Did you even visit the site? Did you even verify that the link's content?
I bet you didn't, and you simply removed the link without checking. Is there a guideline for this kind of behavior on Wikipedia for removing others links senselessly? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deeptii ( talk • contribs) 03:54, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed,
Global warming, is on
article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at
Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
The above is a
templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. --
TS 13:17, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Seba5618! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Seba5618,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deprod notification: Danny Pacheco
I've removed the PROD from this article, which you added a {{ prod-2}} to, as it had already been deleted via the PROD process once – I've nominated it for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Pacheco. — Snigbrook 13:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for that revert, there must have been an error with wikipedia since I was undoing the damage done to the main page (which someone has now taken care off as well) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Curuxz ( talk • contribs) 09:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Did you even visit the site? Did you even verify that the link's content?
I bet you didn't, and you simply removed the link without checking. Is there a guideline for this kind of behavior on Wikipedia for removing others links senselessly? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deeptii ( talk • contribs) 03:54, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed,
Global warming, is on
article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at
Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
The above is a
templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. --
TS 13:17, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Seba5618! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Seba5618,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)