From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks for your encouragement. By nature, I have always been an independent and solitary researcher. Give me a little time and I will start getting a hang of the protocols and procedures you have outlined. Guru Fatha Singh Khalsa ( talk) 17:45, 13 August 2010 (UTC) reply

September 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kundalini Yoga. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Spaceman Spiff 17:34, 11 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for caring, but it seems that you are jumping the gun here. I am simply including a historical reference to the main person who opened this style of Kundalini Yoga to the West. I have moved the mentions into the history section out of the lead paragraph. I have updated the language. What is your POV on this? Is this not historically relevant? There has been no mention of schools, or promoting schools. When you overreact it betrays your bias - please clarify yourself. -- RogerThatOne72 ( talk) 17:50, 11 September 2010 (UTC) reply

AN/I thread

I have opened a discussion at WP:AN/I concerning your conduct, which can be found here. Gatoclass ( talk) 10:59, 27 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank you. Please take a look at the process of gaining consensus page. Please read it carefully - there are several stages to it, none of which you have followed in any of your actions over the past 2 years - despite numerous requests. If you have any understanding of spirituality and kundalini yoga; the first lesson you learn is not to judge -- those who judge are usually the ones guilty of that exact same behavior. So, kindly please stop harassing me and clearly detail your objections point by point before you take any further action. When you are ready - perhaps years from now, or maybe tomorrow - then I offer an olive branch, as I have numerous times before, and invite you to a dialogue in the talk pages. Otherwise, if you cannot resolve this issue in yourself, please move on to another topic. RogerThatOne72 ( talk) 16:41, 21 August 2012 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks for your encouragement. By nature, I have always been an independent and solitary researcher. Give me a little time and I will start getting a hang of the protocols and procedures you have outlined. Guru Fatha Singh Khalsa ( talk) 17:45, 13 August 2010 (UTC) reply

September 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kundalini Yoga. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Spaceman Spiff 17:34, 11 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for caring, but it seems that you are jumping the gun here. I am simply including a historical reference to the main person who opened this style of Kundalini Yoga to the West. I have moved the mentions into the history section out of the lead paragraph. I have updated the language. What is your POV on this? Is this not historically relevant? There has been no mention of schools, or promoting schools. When you overreact it betrays your bias - please clarify yourself. -- RogerThatOne72 ( talk) 17:50, 11 September 2010 (UTC) reply

AN/I thread

I have opened a discussion at WP:AN/I concerning your conduct, which can be found here. Gatoclass ( talk) 10:59, 27 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank you. Please take a look at the process of gaining consensus page. Please read it carefully - there are several stages to it, none of which you have followed in any of your actions over the past 2 years - despite numerous requests. If you have any understanding of spirituality and kundalini yoga; the first lesson you learn is not to judge -- those who judge are usually the ones guilty of that exact same behavior. So, kindly please stop harassing me and clearly detail your objections point by point before you take any further action. When you are ready - perhaps years from now, or maybe tomorrow - then I offer an olive branch, as I have numerous times before, and invite you to a dialogue in the talk pages. Otherwise, if you cannot resolve this issue in yourself, please move on to another topic. RogerThatOne72 ( talk) 16:41, 21 August 2012 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook