This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
see previous talk at Archive 16
I have made extensive edits to Columbus Delano. Please feel free to make any needed improvements. I covered corruption in addition to Indian policy and the 1871 Yosemite scientific expedition. Cmguy777 ( talk) 22:32, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello Professor! I attended your presentation today. It was amazing!
The article on the recent ethnic riots in Kyrgyzstan needs attention from an expert on the subject. Since you're an expert historian, I would like you to take a look at the article and help us clean it up a bit. I've made some contributions to the article, but it's very dangerous for me to freely write about the clashes. It seems like nobody is particularly interested in improving the article.
By the way, I studied at Carroll College as an exchange student a couple of years ago. It was a great experience! I really liked Montana. The winters are a bit cold, but other than that, it's a great place to be! Nataev ( talk) 20:29, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Following your this edit:
-- Tito Dutta ? 03:15, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Well no shit he wrote in French, as most Genevans did. He was born in Geneva, which was not part of France at the time and the Wikipedia entry for him describes him as Genevan. Now please stop reverting my edit-- it's accurate.
You may find this amusing: http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/07/18/peter-mackay-war-of-1812_n_1683099.html?ref=topbar
I have been working on William Adams Richardson, President Grant's Secretary of Treasury, during the Panic of 1873. I thought that his reaction to the Panic was interesting. Please feel free to edit the article if you have time. Thanks. Cmguy777 ( talk) 22:04, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Rjensen. I believe Grant's Cabinet, with the exception of Hamilton Fish, has long been ignored by historians. Expanding on his Cabinet, might give better understanding into any corruption during Grant's administration. Grant allowing Richardson to increase money supply may suggest that Grant himself made a proactive effort to alleviate or postpone the ensueing five year deppression. Cmguy777 ( talk) 18:36, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I saw your discussion of Gregg Frazer's book on theistic rationalism at the Deism page. If you have the book handy, perhaps you could update the references to him at the Thomas Jefferson and Religion and the Theistic rationalism pages. Right now they refer to Frazer's Ph.D dissertation, which was the basis of his book, of course. I'd do it myself but don't have access to an English-speaking university library. -- Other Choices ( talk) 12:18, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Dr. Jensen,
Are you the same Jensen that started H-Net?
I'm wondering about joining the American Historical Association. Do you recommend? Also, what about Phi Alpha Theta? Both publish a journal; which do you think is the more reliable and informative?
Thanks! Yopienso ( talk) 10:07, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
I recommend Phi Alpha Theta -- is there a local chapter at your school you can join? They have very good regional meetings every spring. If you are in US History, I also recommend the Organization of American Historians (which publishes the Journal of American History). There are some specialized groups of note: Southern Historical Assoc; Society of Military History (both with journals). Good luck! Rjensen ( talk) 10:25, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Rjensen, good to see more references in Henry VIII! :) Could I ask a favour though... When you're adding them, could you follow the existing style for the article? At the moment you're adding in long citations, when the rest of the article uses short citations with a particular template (see WP:CITE for more on this). Cheers! Hchc2009 ( talk) 07:05, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
The Fair Labor Standards Act was a major legislation too. Aditionally the Republican gains in Congress in 1938 mark a turning point. Why shouldn´t we say the second new deal ended in 1938? -- Pass3456 ( talk) 09:26, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: Explicit use of et al. in: |author=
(
help), Thomas E. Hall (1998).
The Great Depression: An International Disaster of Perverse Economic Policies. p. 147., Edwin Amenta (2000).
Bold Relief: Institutional Politics and the Origins of Modern American Social Policy. Princeton UP. p. 46., Peter B. Evans; Dietrich Rueschemeyer; Theda Skocpol (1985).
Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge. p. 134., and JAMES CIMENT (2001).
ENCYCLOPEDIA OF THE GREAT DEPRESSION AND THE NEW D. M E SHARPE.
Rjensen (
talk) 10:13, 5 August 2012 (UTC)Hello Rjensen. I have been working on Edwards Pierrepont, President Ulysses S. Grant's U.S. Attorney General. He was teamed up by President Grant with Grant's appointed Secretary of Treasury, Benjamin Bristow, to purge out government corruption. Pierrepont prosecuted the Whiskey Ring. Pierrepont was involved with Reconstruction, however, I am not sure how extensive his involvement was. Please feel free to make any improvements to the article. Thanks. Cmguy777 ( talk) 22:16, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Rjensen. In addition to the Whiskey Ring, I think there needs to be a section on the Boss Tweed Ring in New York in the early 1870's. Was the Grant Adminisration involved in any way with stopping the Tweed Ring? Pierrepont was involved with the committee of 70. Did Grant's New York U.S. Attorney prosecute the Tweed Ring? Also, what did Attorney General Pierrepont do during Reconstruction? As far as I know, these are things they don't teach in the History classes at College. I am relying on Smith and McFeely for information. I really think a whole semester of college could be taught on the Guilded Age. Cmguy777 ( talk) 21:49, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Rjensen. I would have to find out if Tweed was indicted in a federal court. Cmguy777 ( talk) 17:52, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Tweed's trial was in 1873 and appears to be by the state, not federal. Cmguy777 ( talk) 18:35, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Pierrepont was quite active as United States Attorney General appointed by President Ulysses S. Grant. I added two sections on naturalization and Southern reforms. Possibly narration, context, and flow could be added. Apparently there was corruption in the southern U.S. Attorneys and U.S. Marshalls departments that Pierrepont cleaned up. The NYT stated that President Grant sustained and endorsed Pierreponts investigations and reforms. Feel free to take a look at the article. Thanks. Cmguy777 ( talk) 23:13, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Can you advise? According to User statistics you (Rjensen) have been the first and main contributor for this article [ [1]]. After seeing that Canada has now been added while others are still missing, Qexigator proposes that the "See also" section could include one or more of: Commonwealth realm, Statute of Westminster 1931, Territorial evolution of the British Empire. The article British Empire provides a good general account, but perhaps many readers, not being experts, may (unlike professional historians) need to be reminded that there is this other factual background to the historiography? (In the meantime, I am awaiting delivery from Amazon of the book about Midwest.USA.) Qexigator ( talk) 07:43, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
The Further reading section of History of New Zealand is now quite long. I would like to see it split out to a separate Bibliography of New Zealand history similar to the Bibliography of Australian history. I have slowely pottering away on one for New Zealand in general at User:Alan Liefting/Articles/Bibliography of New Zealand. The NZ WikiProject had not shown a lot of interest in a page of this type. -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 02:03, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You are approved for access to 350 high quality reference resources through Credo Reference.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 17:22, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Dear Dr. Jensen, thank you so much. A great article that you started about an important subject. I happened to stumble upon that article this night, and just thought I might improve it a little. Thanks for the article, your kind words and for all your great work! -- A.S. Brown ( talk) 02:25, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello Rjensen! I don't know if this will work, as I haven't been able to set up a Wikipedia account (tech difficulties) so I have not talk page, and am trying to get a message to you. This is Jenny Krieg -- jkrieg(at)isicollc(dot)com -- with a question about your chart "Economic Growth in America Per Capita Income 1700-1840" in Wikimedia. Could you please tell me where you obtained the data for this chart? I am helping with a project, and this information would be of great assistance. We are amateur researchers. Thanks a bunch! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.21.114.23 ( talk) 15:53, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
You rock!! Have a great weekend, Jenny — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.21.114.23 ( talk) 19:13, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Ed
[talk]
[majestic titan] 01:11, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Pls see Talk:War of 1812#Oregon Country, not Oregon Territory. Moxy ( talk) 16:54, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
I am working on the 28th Infantry Division (United States)#Operation Iraqi Freedom Alpha Company, 28th Signal Battalion section, which is tagged for spacing (i.e. copyediting) and also for importance or relevance. I agree with the tagging, the section is one huge paragraph filled with peacock wording, and worse, the 28th Signal Battalion is a small unit in a big infantry division, and a small unit in Operation Iraqi Freedom. I would appreciate your advice on where, if anywhere, this section should be placed. Should it be where it is now? Should it be in Operation Iraqi Freedom? Should it be an independent article? Perhaps it should be Wikipedia:Userfied, and if so, with what user? What is your advice?
I am working on the GOCE September drive, and came to this section deliberately, since I am from Pennsylvania, and a former Army Ordnance lieutenant. I met you and your wife at Wikimedia 2012, and I was sorry you could only stay for drinks and not dinner. -- DThomsen8 ( talk) 20:17, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is " 2008 Presidential Election talk page". Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 23:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello RJensen,
I am located in Gunnison, Colorado, have access to Western State Colorado University and Leslie J. Savage Library on campus, and would like to engage in the Wikimedia Outreach and Education Programs in this area. Boulder, Colorado has wikipedians working with campuses on the eastern slope, but the western slope has no one (that I am aware of). I would be interested in becoming a spokesperson on this side of the divide and organizing some activity within the scope of the Outreach and Strategy groups.
I have hesitated contacting the Public Relations people at Western State until I have a firm understanding of the programs I may present to their faculty and student bodies, although I have mentioned my intentions to the kind folks at the library on campus and the public library in town.
I also have a repoire with some of the elementary level schools in the area and would work with them on projects for younger academians.
I would consider as well the local museums and art galleries in the area for the GLAM projects.
And a final note on the Wikimedia Chapters. This would be another area I would discuss with anyone interested.
Draconrex ( talk) 16:38, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Continued discussion at your email, also I see Mike now, and thanks for inviting him into our conversation. Draconrex ( talk) 15:06, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
WP:Mountains, WP:Geography, Categories:Wikipedia requested photographs in Colorado, Talk:Gunnison Country Times, these are some things I would like to pursue in my Wikipedia adventure. Perhaps you and Mike would like to guide me in the right directions. Meanwhile, I shall use good judgement in my boldness. Draconrex ( talk) 02:56, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Re this, if you're going to add stuff, please properly ref it in format consistent with the rest of the refs so others don't have to come by and fix your entries. We're trying to get this to FA. Thanks. PumpkinSky talk 13:14, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Your critical eye and experience with the topic is needed at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Harry S. Truman/archive2. Thank you. Binksternet ( talk) 17:25, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators ( about the project • what coordinators do) 09:47, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
. . . are supposed to be identified as such: {{All included}} and {{Distinguished subcategory}} templates. (Non diffusing subcategories is what your statement implies - see WP:DUPCAT). But I am ok templating the cats. A template might help automate the diffusion in the future (if it isn't already). Then all faculty will have to be added as American Historians though. There isn't anything called partial non diffusion (I guess you were using the word in a different sense). Churn and change ( talk) 16:10, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Dear user Rjensen, the German Wikipedia article de:Missisippi-Delta does not describe the same thing as the English article Mississippi Delta, despite the similar name. The German article describes a much larger area with a focus on the Mississippi River Delta, not the specific region in NW Missisippi state described in the English article. Therefore I removed the interwiki links since as far as I understand it only articles about substantially the same thing should have interwiki links. You reinserted the link in the English Wikipedia (in the German Wikipedia the removal was OKed by an editor, but then a Bot reinserted it there too...). Care to explain? Thank you! -- 92.226.26.60 ( talk) 19:12, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
All editors who were approved for a Credo account and filled out the survey giving their username and email address were emailed Credo account access information. Please check your email.
If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me. I hope you enjoy your account! User:Ocaasi 15:38, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!
If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot ( talk) 05:12, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Per our previous discussion, I finished the final point—adding the category name to all articles in the subcategories. I didn't do that for the subcategories "Historians of America" and "Historians of Native Americans" since looks to me they shouldn't be subcategories of "American historians" to start with. Churn and change ( talk) 17:59, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Lincoln did not have the authority to enforce emancipation proclamation. Removing my work while leaving others work that stated Lincoln did have authority because his command of military forces allowed him to enforce anything he wished shows your bias. Can't we resolve this by leaving both? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobby ronayne ( talk • contribs) 14:33, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project and/or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Nick-D (
talk) and
Ed
[talk]
[majestic titan] 20:58, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
In regard to this edit, that IP is all over the map (well, mainly the Indiana map) plugging what appears to be their own work. Drmies ( talk) 19:55, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:01, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello Rjensen. I have been working on Grant's presidential reputation in the Presidency of Ulysses S. Grant article. This may be the most important part in the article since there seems to be a delicate balance between the corruption or scandals and his successes as President. I added more information, mainly that the corruption was reformed in six of his seven Cabinet positions by his second term in office, the exception being the Department of Navy. I added the Secretary George Robeson had implement U.S. naval reform after the Virginius Incident. If you could take a look at the Presidential reputation section and or make any changes that reflect current historical opinion on Grant's Presidency, that would be fine. Thanks. Cmguy777 ( talk) 22:45, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
What I believe might be overlooked by historians is that Grant had talented and exceptional cabinet members including Hamilton Fish, Benjamin Bristow, Amos T. Akerman, Alphonso Taft, Edwards Pierrepont, George S. Boutwell, and Marshall Jewell. At one point, I believe in 1875, Grant had five reformers on his cabinet, Secretary Fish, Secretary Bristow, Postmaster Jewell, Attorney General Pierrepont, and Secretary of Interior Zachariah Chandler. Grant's strongest cabinet had to be in 1875. Cmguy777 ( talk) 06:42, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
I am currently reading his book particularly the Presidency section. I believe he is actually kind to Grant on the Panic of 1873. One part I read was that Brand really went after Charles Sumner and Carl Schurz for not supporting Grant's Ku Klux Klan Act. That was refreshing. Sumner's opposition to Grant was on a personal level and he would not support anything that Grant wanted, good or bad. Schurz is viewed as somewhat devious for neglecting the rights of freedman. Brand contends that Santo Domingo and the Ku Klux Klan bill is what divided the Republican Party in 1872. Cmguy777 ( talk) 06:10, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Greetings,
Your article in the Journal of Military History has inspired me to venture into the Wiki frontier. You recommend training Wikipedia editors in historiography and the use of scholarly research. I'm in a different situation. I am a professional military historian who has no experience editing a Wikipedia article. So before I jump in a make a mistake -and gain a bad rep- it seems prudent to ask your advice on how to get started. Any advice you have will be appreciated.
Thank you in advance Military historian zephyr ( talk) 00:32, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
The Washington Post article does in fact discuss McGeorge Bundy and the Ford Foundation. However, I am trying to collaborate, and I would agree that the article does a better job of verifying the existence of a wide-ranging scandal in 1967—that's why I moved it earlier in the sentence. I'm not sure why you and the IP editor feel it doesn't belong. But rather than edit warring, I suppose I will find other sources that discuss the broader scope of the scandal at the Ford Foundation all at once. In the meantime, if you are interested in working on the Ford Foundation page, maybe you'd consider some of my suggestions on the talk page over there. Thanks, groupuscule ( talk) 22:35, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
A Bundy on the List
THE LIST of Establishmentarians involved with the CIA in its penetration of private institutions is lengthy and includes such other figures as Robert J. Manning, editor of the Atlantic Monthly, and McGeorge Bundy, who has had experience both inside and outside the Government. As a foreign policy advisor to Presidents Kennedy and Johnson, Bundy in effect supervised the CIA operation. Today he is president of the Ford Foundation.
Thank you for your work on the New Deal, Rjensen! ComputerJA ( talk) 04:58, 22 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Nick-D (
talk) and
Ian Rose (
talk) 02:58, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For your complete overhaul of Urban history to remove the major copyvio problems. Though I tagged it for deletion, you did the better thing which was to fix the problems, and as a result Wikipedia is better than it would have been otherwise. Well done! Jayron 32 13:04, 26 October 2012 (UTC) |
I recently made some changes to the Charles Sumner article. Lawrence Goldstone (2011), Inherently Unequal: The Betrayal of Equal Rights by the Supreme Court, 1865-1903, p. 18 contends that Sumner conditioned African American suffrage on literacy. Did Sumner ever really back down from this view? Was Sumner for the 15th Amendment that President Grant advocated without any conditions on suffrage? Cmguy777 ( talk) 17:10, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Rjensen. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.223.105.147 ( talk) 00:36, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
I understand that you have been writing scholarly articles and popular books for some time,now; however, I believe you have been doing so with an erroneous point of view.
J.B. Jensen Little River, SC — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.168.225.86 ( talk) 05:00, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is 66.99.132.30 / Toddsmith199 / Toadsmith / 50.103.xxx.xxx. Thank you. Jayjg (talk) 00:21, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Hallo,
I reverted your edits about the popularity of Mussolini "argued" by a "new scholarship" . There are several problems about it, let's go from the less to the more important:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Urban history, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colin Jones ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:29, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Hacker (cite #8 in the article) says on p1011 "To their Waspishness should be added the tendency to be located on the Eastern seaboard or around San Francisco, to be prep school and Ivy League educated, and to be possessed of inherited wealth." From this it appears that wealth is a secondary W to White, adding to the cloud of meanings, as found in Times Litt Supp: Mary Beard; Jewish Press.com; Educational Foundations: Diverse Histories, Diverse Perspectives, Grace Huerta, 2007.
There are also plenty of flaky sources like the Urban Dictionary and worse.
I think this is easily enough to show that W can mean both White and Wealthy, as indeed the article already says, so it should go in the lead also. all the best Chiswick Chap ( talk) 16:12, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
see previous talk at Archive 16
I have made extensive edits to Columbus Delano. Please feel free to make any needed improvements. I covered corruption in addition to Indian policy and the 1871 Yosemite scientific expedition. Cmguy777 ( talk) 22:32, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello Professor! I attended your presentation today. It was amazing!
The article on the recent ethnic riots in Kyrgyzstan needs attention from an expert on the subject. Since you're an expert historian, I would like you to take a look at the article and help us clean it up a bit. I've made some contributions to the article, but it's very dangerous for me to freely write about the clashes. It seems like nobody is particularly interested in improving the article.
By the way, I studied at Carroll College as an exchange student a couple of years ago. It was a great experience! I really liked Montana. The winters are a bit cold, but other than that, it's a great place to be! Nataev ( talk) 20:29, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Following your this edit:
-- Tito Dutta ? 03:15, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Well no shit he wrote in French, as most Genevans did. He was born in Geneva, which was not part of France at the time and the Wikipedia entry for him describes him as Genevan. Now please stop reverting my edit-- it's accurate.
You may find this amusing: http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/07/18/peter-mackay-war-of-1812_n_1683099.html?ref=topbar
I have been working on William Adams Richardson, President Grant's Secretary of Treasury, during the Panic of 1873. I thought that his reaction to the Panic was interesting. Please feel free to edit the article if you have time. Thanks. Cmguy777 ( talk) 22:04, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Rjensen. I believe Grant's Cabinet, with the exception of Hamilton Fish, has long been ignored by historians. Expanding on his Cabinet, might give better understanding into any corruption during Grant's administration. Grant allowing Richardson to increase money supply may suggest that Grant himself made a proactive effort to alleviate or postpone the ensueing five year deppression. Cmguy777 ( talk) 18:36, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I saw your discussion of Gregg Frazer's book on theistic rationalism at the Deism page. If you have the book handy, perhaps you could update the references to him at the Thomas Jefferson and Religion and the Theistic rationalism pages. Right now they refer to Frazer's Ph.D dissertation, which was the basis of his book, of course. I'd do it myself but don't have access to an English-speaking university library. -- Other Choices ( talk) 12:18, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Dr. Jensen,
Are you the same Jensen that started H-Net?
I'm wondering about joining the American Historical Association. Do you recommend? Also, what about Phi Alpha Theta? Both publish a journal; which do you think is the more reliable and informative?
Thanks! Yopienso ( talk) 10:07, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
I recommend Phi Alpha Theta -- is there a local chapter at your school you can join? They have very good regional meetings every spring. If you are in US History, I also recommend the Organization of American Historians (which publishes the Journal of American History). There are some specialized groups of note: Southern Historical Assoc; Society of Military History (both with journals). Good luck! Rjensen ( talk) 10:25, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Rjensen, good to see more references in Henry VIII! :) Could I ask a favour though... When you're adding them, could you follow the existing style for the article? At the moment you're adding in long citations, when the rest of the article uses short citations with a particular template (see WP:CITE for more on this). Cheers! Hchc2009 ( talk) 07:05, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
The Fair Labor Standards Act was a major legislation too. Aditionally the Republican gains in Congress in 1938 mark a turning point. Why shouldn´t we say the second new deal ended in 1938? -- Pass3456 ( talk) 09:26, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: Explicit use of et al. in: |author=
(
help), Thomas E. Hall (1998).
The Great Depression: An International Disaster of Perverse Economic Policies. p. 147., Edwin Amenta (2000).
Bold Relief: Institutional Politics and the Origins of Modern American Social Policy. Princeton UP. p. 46., Peter B. Evans; Dietrich Rueschemeyer; Theda Skocpol (1985).
Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge. p. 134., and JAMES CIMENT (2001).
ENCYCLOPEDIA OF THE GREAT DEPRESSION AND THE NEW D. M E SHARPE.
Rjensen (
talk) 10:13, 5 August 2012 (UTC)Hello Rjensen. I have been working on Edwards Pierrepont, President Ulysses S. Grant's U.S. Attorney General. He was teamed up by President Grant with Grant's appointed Secretary of Treasury, Benjamin Bristow, to purge out government corruption. Pierrepont prosecuted the Whiskey Ring. Pierrepont was involved with Reconstruction, however, I am not sure how extensive his involvement was. Please feel free to make any improvements to the article. Thanks. Cmguy777 ( talk) 22:16, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Rjensen. In addition to the Whiskey Ring, I think there needs to be a section on the Boss Tweed Ring in New York in the early 1870's. Was the Grant Adminisration involved in any way with stopping the Tweed Ring? Pierrepont was involved with the committee of 70. Did Grant's New York U.S. Attorney prosecute the Tweed Ring? Also, what did Attorney General Pierrepont do during Reconstruction? As far as I know, these are things they don't teach in the History classes at College. I am relying on Smith and McFeely for information. I really think a whole semester of college could be taught on the Guilded Age. Cmguy777 ( talk) 21:49, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Rjensen. I would have to find out if Tweed was indicted in a federal court. Cmguy777 ( talk) 17:52, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Tweed's trial was in 1873 and appears to be by the state, not federal. Cmguy777 ( talk) 18:35, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Pierrepont was quite active as United States Attorney General appointed by President Ulysses S. Grant. I added two sections on naturalization and Southern reforms. Possibly narration, context, and flow could be added. Apparently there was corruption in the southern U.S. Attorneys and U.S. Marshalls departments that Pierrepont cleaned up. The NYT stated that President Grant sustained and endorsed Pierreponts investigations and reforms. Feel free to take a look at the article. Thanks. Cmguy777 ( talk) 23:13, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Can you advise? According to User statistics you (Rjensen) have been the first and main contributor for this article [ [1]]. After seeing that Canada has now been added while others are still missing, Qexigator proposes that the "See also" section could include one or more of: Commonwealth realm, Statute of Westminster 1931, Territorial evolution of the British Empire. The article British Empire provides a good general account, but perhaps many readers, not being experts, may (unlike professional historians) need to be reminded that there is this other factual background to the historiography? (In the meantime, I am awaiting delivery from Amazon of the book about Midwest.USA.) Qexigator ( talk) 07:43, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
The Further reading section of History of New Zealand is now quite long. I would like to see it split out to a separate Bibliography of New Zealand history similar to the Bibliography of Australian history. I have slowely pottering away on one for New Zealand in general at User:Alan Liefting/Articles/Bibliography of New Zealand. The NZ WikiProject had not shown a lot of interest in a page of this type. -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 02:03, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You are approved for access to 350 high quality reference resources through Credo Reference.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 17:22, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Dear Dr. Jensen, thank you so much. A great article that you started about an important subject. I happened to stumble upon that article this night, and just thought I might improve it a little. Thanks for the article, your kind words and for all your great work! -- A.S. Brown ( talk) 02:25, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello Rjensen! I don't know if this will work, as I haven't been able to set up a Wikipedia account (tech difficulties) so I have not talk page, and am trying to get a message to you. This is Jenny Krieg -- jkrieg(at)isicollc(dot)com -- with a question about your chart "Economic Growth in America Per Capita Income 1700-1840" in Wikimedia. Could you please tell me where you obtained the data for this chart? I am helping with a project, and this information would be of great assistance. We are amateur researchers. Thanks a bunch! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.21.114.23 ( talk) 15:53, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
You rock!! Have a great weekend, Jenny — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.21.114.23 ( talk) 19:13, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Ed
[talk]
[majestic titan] 01:11, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Pls see Talk:War of 1812#Oregon Country, not Oregon Territory. Moxy ( talk) 16:54, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
I am working on the 28th Infantry Division (United States)#Operation Iraqi Freedom Alpha Company, 28th Signal Battalion section, which is tagged for spacing (i.e. copyediting) and also for importance or relevance. I agree with the tagging, the section is one huge paragraph filled with peacock wording, and worse, the 28th Signal Battalion is a small unit in a big infantry division, and a small unit in Operation Iraqi Freedom. I would appreciate your advice on where, if anywhere, this section should be placed. Should it be where it is now? Should it be in Operation Iraqi Freedom? Should it be an independent article? Perhaps it should be Wikipedia:Userfied, and if so, with what user? What is your advice?
I am working on the GOCE September drive, and came to this section deliberately, since I am from Pennsylvania, and a former Army Ordnance lieutenant. I met you and your wife at Wikimedia 2012, and I was sorry you could only stay for drinks and not dinner. -- DThomsen8 ( talk) 20:17, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is " 2008 Presidential Election talk page". Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 23:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello RJensen,
I am located in Gunnison, Colorado, have access to Western State Colorado University and Leslie J. Savage Library on campus, and would like to engage in the Wikimedia Outreach and Education Programs in this area. Boulder, Colorado has wikipedians working with campuses on the eastern slope, but the western slope has no one (that I am aware of). I would be interested in becoming a spokesperson on this side of the divide and organizing some activity within the scope of the Outreach and Strategy groups.
I have hesitated contacting the Public Relations people at Western State until I have a firm understanding of the programs I may present to their faculty and student bodies, although I have mentioned my intentions to the kind folks at the library on campus and the public library in town.
I also have a repoire with some of the elementary level schools in the area and would work with them on projects for younger academians.
I would consider as well the local museums and art galleries in the area for the GLAM projects.
And a final note on the Wikimedia Chapters. This would be another area I would discuss with anyone interested.
Draconrex ( talk) 16:38, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Continued discussion at your email, also I see Mike now, and thanks for inviting him into our conversation. Draconrex ( talk) 15:06, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
WP:Mountains, WP:Geography, Categories:Wikipedia requested photographs in Colorado, Talk:Gunnison Country Times, these are some things I would like to pursue in my Wikipedia adventure. Perhaps you and Mike would like to guide me in the right directions. Meanwhile, I shall use good judgement in my boldness. Draconrex ( talk) 02:56, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Re this, if you're going to add stuff, please properly ref it in format consistent with the rest of the refs so others don't have to come by and fix your entries. We're trying to get this to FA. Thanks. PumpkinSky talk 13:14, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Your critical eye and experience with the topic is needed at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Harry S. Truman/archive2. Thank you. Binksternet ( talk) 17:25, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators ( about the project • what coordinators do) 09:47, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
. . . are supposed to be identified as such: {{All included}} and {{Distinguished subcategory}} templates. (Non diffusing subcategories is what your statement implies - see WP:DUPCAT). But I am ok templating the cats. A template might help automate the diffusion in the future (if it isn't already). Then all faculty will have to be added as American Historians though. There isn't anything called partial non diffusion (I guess you were using the word in a different sense). Churn and change ( talk) 16:10, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Dear user Rjensen, the German Wikipedia article de:Missisippi-Delta does not describe the same thing as the English article Mississippi Delta, despite the similar name. The German article describes a much larger area with a focus on the Mississippi River Delta, not the specific region in NW Missisippi state described in the English article. Therefore I removed the interwiki links since as far as I understand it only articles about substantially the same thing should have interwiki links. You reinserted the link in the English Wikipedia (in the German Wikipedia the removal was OKed by an editor, but then a Bot reinserted it there too...). Care to explain? Thank you! -- 92.226.26.60 ( talk) 19:12, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
All editors who were approved for a Credo account and filled out the survey giving their username and email address were emailed Credo account access information. Please check your email.
If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me. I hope you enjoy your account! User:Ocaasi 15:38, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!
If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot ( talk) 05:12, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Per our previous discussion, I finished the final point—adding the category name to all articles in the subcategories. I didn't do that for the subcategories "Historians of America" and "Historians of Native Americans" since looks to me they shouldn't be subcategories of "American historians" to start with. Churn and change ( talk) 17:59, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Lincoln did not have the authority to enforce emancipation proclamation. Removing my work while leaving others work that stated Lincoln did have authority because his command of military forces allowed him to enforce anything he wished shows your bias. Can't we resolve this by leaving both? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobby ronayne ( talk • contribs) 14:33, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project and/or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Nick-D (
talk) and
Ed
[talk]
[majestic titan] 20:58, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
In regard to this edit, that IP is all over the map (well, mainly the Indiana map) plugging what appears to be their own work. Drmies ( talk) 19:55, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:01, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello Rjensen. I have been working on Grant's presidential reputation in the Presidency of Ulysses S. Grant article. This may be the most important part in the article since there seems to be a delicate balance between the corruption or scandals and his successes as President. I added more information, mainly that the corruption was reformed in six of his seven Cabinet positions by his second term in office, the exception being the Department of Navy. I added the Secretary George Robeson had implement U.S. naval reform after the Virginius Incident. If you could take a look at the Presidential reputation section and or make any changes that reflect current historical opinion on Grant's Presidency, that would be fine. Thanks. Cmguy777 ( talk) 22:45, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
What I believe might be overlooked by historians is that Grant had talented and exceptional cabinet members including Hamilton Fish, Benjamin Bristow, Amos T. Akerman, Alphonso Taft, Edwards Pierrepont, George S. Boutwell, and Marshall Jewell. At one point, I believe in 1875, Grant had five reformers on his cabinet, Secretary Fish, Secretary Bristow, Postmaster Jewell, Attorney General Pierrepont, and Secretary of Interior Zachariah Chandler. Grant's strongest cabinet had to be in 1875. Cmguy777 ( talk) 06:42, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
I am currently reading his book particularly the Presidency section. I believe he is actually kind to Grant on the Panic of 1873. One part I read was that Brand really went after Charles Sumner and Carl Schurz for not supporting Grant's Ku Klux Klan Act. That was refreshing. Sumner's opposition to Grant was on a personal level and he would not support anything that Grant wanted, good or bad. Schurz is viewed as somewhat devious for neglecting the rights of freedman. Brand contends that Santo Domingo and the Ku Klux Klan bill is what divided the Republican Party in 1872. Cmguy777 ( talk) 06:10, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Greetings,
Your article in the Journal of Military History has inspired me to venture into the Wiki frontier. You recommend training Wikipedia editors in historiography and the use of scholarly research. I'm in a different situation. I am a professional military historian who has no experience editing a Wikipedia article. So before I jump in a make a mistake -and gain a bad rep- it seems prudent to ask your advice on how to get started. Any advice you have will be appreciated.
Thank you in advance Military historian zephyr ( talk) 00:32, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
The Washington Post article does in fact discuss McGeorge Bundy and the Ford Foundation. However, I am trying to collaborate, and I would agree that the article does a better job of verifying the existence of a wide-ranging scandal in 1967—that's why I moved it earlier in the sentence. I'm not sure why you and the IP editor feel it doesn't belong. But rather than edit warring, I suppose I will find other sources that discuss the broader scope of the scandal at the Ford Foundation all at once. In the meantime, if you are interested in working on the Ford Foundation page, maybe you'd consider some of my suggestions on the talk page over there. Thanks, groupuscule ( talk) 22:35, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
A Bundy on the List
THE LIST of Establishmentarians involved with the CIA in its penetration of private institutions is lengthy and includes such other figures as Robert J. Manning, editor of the Atlantic Monthly, and McGeorge Bundy, who has had experience both inside and outside the Government. As a foreign policy advisor to Presidents Kennedy and Johnson, Bundy in effect supervised the CIA operation. Today he is president of the Ford Foundation.
Thank you for your work on the New Deal, Rjensen! ComputerJA ( talk) 04:58, 22 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Nick-D (
talk) and
Ian Rose (
talk) 02:58, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For your complete overhaul of Urban history to remove the major copyvio problems. Though I tagged it for deletion, you did the better thing which was to fix the problems, and as a result Wikipedia is better than it would have been otherwise. Well done! Jayron 32 13:04, 26 October 2012 (UTC) |
I recently made some changes to the Charles Sumner article. Lawrence Goldstone (2011), Inherently Unequal: The Betrayal of Equal Rights by the Supreme Court, 1865-1903, p. 18 contends that Sumner conditioned African American suffrage on literacy. Did Sumner ever really back down from this view? Was Sumner for the 15th Amendment that President Grant advocated without any conditions on suffrage? Cmguy777 ( talk) 17:10, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Rjensen. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.223.105.147 ( talk) 00:36, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
I understand that you have been writing scholarly articles and popular books for some time,now; however, I believe you have been doing so with an erroneous point of view.
J.B. Jensen Little River, SC — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.168.225.86 ( talk) 05:00, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is 66.99.132.30 / Toddsmith199 / Toadsmith / 50.103.xxx.xxx. Thank you. Jayjg (talk) 00:21, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Hallo,
I reverted your edits about the popularity of Mussolini "argued" by a "new scholarship" . There are several problems about it, let's go from the less to the more important:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Urban history, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colin Jones ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:29, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Hacker (cite #8 in the article) says on p1011 "To their Waspishness should be added the tendency to be located on the Eastern seaboard or around San Francisco, to be prep school and Ivy League educated, and to be possessed of inherited wealth." From this it appears that wealth is a secondary W to White, adding to the cloud of meanings, as found in Times Litt Supp: Mary Beard; Jewish Press.com; Educational Foundations: Diverse Histories, Diverse Perspectives, Grace Huerta, 2007.
There are also plenty of flaky sources like the Urban Dictionary and worse.
I think this is easily enough to show that W can mean both White and Wealthy, as indeed the article already says, so it should go in the lead also. all the best Chiswick Chap ( talk) 16:12, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |