This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
MCEllis has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Thanks for staying up trying to fix the error I was getting with Module:Wikidata. I'm sure someone will figure it out tomorrow.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
Hi RexxS,
It was good to see you at the meetup yesterday.
You asked me to write here, asking for help with how to access the stuff that places delete tags. But coincidentally, yesterday evening, in this thread, I was advised to use "the DI tab". With some difficulty (it isn't a tab, and it usually doesn't exist) I managed to find it. It turns out that I've had twinkle installed for years, and had never noticed the TW tab. Maproom ( talk) 13:37, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
and, on the subject of discouraging new users from trying to create articles, I have collected some discussions at User:Maproom/New users and New articles. Cheers, Maproom ( talk) 17:46, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Hey RexxS. I've been reading along with your posts and work at Module:Wikidata. I am working on some modules that are tailored to some WP:VG purposes. We're looking to use Wikidata as a source for video game review scores and related data. This "VG Wikidata" if you will is at Module:Video game wikidata/sandbox and the template we are working on for integration is Template:Video game series reviews/sandbox and accompanying Module:Video game series reviews/sandbox. I was wondering if you might be so kind as to read over it and point out any obvious flaws. While I'm a programmer by trade, Lua is not one of my usual languages and I've only really used it here on Wikipedia. Plus I'm still learning Wikidata itself.
Following this experiment, I'll also be looking into integrating Module:Wikidata into Template:Infobox video game, though that will be with #invoke and not with a Lua module. -- ferret ( talk) 19:33, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
reference['snaks']['P577'][1]['datavalue']['value']['time']
may be written as reference.snaks.P577[1].datavalue.value.time
. That's only if it seems more natural to you, of course; I don't know your background, although the habit of terminating each statement with a semi-colon gives me some clues (Lua doesn't need them as I guess you know).Hi RexxS,
I've just translated this page into English but I first tried to use the Wikipedia translate tool and then things went horrendously wrong. I'll never do that again. The complete translated text won't be accepted. What should I do now? Thanks for your help; LouisAlain ( talk) 09:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
*Chevalier of the [[Legion of honour]] <ref>[https://archive.is/57qX8 ''Annuaires des titulaires de la Légion d'Honneur'']</ref>. was instantly blocked. LouisAlain ( talk) 16:50, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
[1] Yeah, I almost made that edit instead--general agreement that we should avoid columns for complex wikitext, since none of the nice browser columns templates are really meant for the complex stuff. -- Izno ( talk) 14:46, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi RexxS and sorry to bother you with a little fix that is needed on my talk page. A sysop from the French Wiki has just sent me a friendly message and I have answered him. Just, I've discovered that my T.P is now inundated with tons of texts whose origin is totaly incomprehensible for me and i'm not sure if my answer will be visible to my correspondent. Do you think you can help? Thanks in advance if you can do something about it. LouisAlain ( talk) 13:55, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-)
which is a redirect to the article
Emoticon. As Iridescent said, when you wrote {{:-)}}
- which I guess you expected to be a template for the smiley face - it actually made a copy of the Emoticon article and placed it in your talk page. All fixed now, :-) --
RexxS (
talk) 14:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)I found an article that was using this template. I'm concerned as this is a test template. I became even more concerned at how many articles use it. I'm not sure what to do except to tell people not to use it. Any suggestions? Bgwhite ( talk) 22:53, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your helpful comments in the first FAC of Reger's Requiem. I try again, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:03, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for creating infobox horse trainer. It's something I have been wanting for a long time! White Arabian Filly Neigh 19:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC) |
Your input would be appreciated here. You might wanna skip past the bickering to my 21:14, 25 May 2016 (UTC) comment onwards. Izkala ( talk) 18:43, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi RexxS,
I've just translated that page only to find out that another Émile Moreau (writer) page exists which simply is entirely wrong and is based solely on IMDb which in turn is wrong of course. Sorry to bother you but imho the Émile Moreau (writer) article must be deleted. LouisAlain ( talk) 10:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Émile Moreau (writer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Émile Moreau (writer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yngvadottir ( talk) 18:51, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
You know, I wonder what would happen if I ran again. I haven't picked up any restraining orders or anything like that, in part because I only edit in trivial areas and never make any real decisions, but it's impossible to be here for a long time and not make enemies. Let's take Gamaliel, for instance: even if that April Fool's Day thing had never happened, enforcing ArbCom sanctions in Gamergate is just a guarantee he'd never pass RfA again, I think. Or what if I were some serious commafucker, wreaking havoc all over the MOS without ever using my bit for it. Would it not be possible for me to still be a fairly decent admin, even if I were restricted from that area? I think one of the problems here is that we generalize too quickly and don't easily allow common sense to play the appropriate part. Muse, muse, muse. Have a great day, Rexx--while you're turning something into an FA, I'll be, I don't know, playing with the kids some, in the pool. There's work horses and luxury horses, as the Dutch say. Drmies ( talk) 14:12, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
I see diving as a sport - even though it isn't, as far as I understand, competitive. Am I wrong? Rathfelder ( talk) 12:56, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
An arbitration case regarding Gamaliel and others has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi Rexx
I wanted to ask you about using your Wikidata infoboxes on Biosphere Reserve articles. UNESCO has made the descriptions of the Biosphere Reserves available under CC-BY-SA and I'm encouraging editors to create the articles for the missing sites, the instructions are here. There are currently 291 reserves with English Wikipedia articles and 374 without, I'm hoping that number will go down quickly. I wanted to ask you if it would possible and what would be the process of creating Wikidata fed infoboxes for these pages. The data in Wikidata for the sites has varying degrees of information, however all sites have the minimum of:
Some sites have a lot more information than this e.g Yellowstone National Park is a Biosphere Reserve.
Can you tell me what needs to happen to create the infoboxes? Also do you think this may be possible for Grade I and Grade 2* listed buildings in the UK? I know that there are items for all the sites on Wikidata because they were added for Wiki Loves Monuments, the same is true for all monuments in France.
Thanks
John Cummings ( talk) 09:38, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
{{Sandbox/Infobox biosphere reserve |fetchwikidata = ALL}}
into a section of an article like
Yellowstone National Park and preview it (please don't save!). You'll see some of the data available from Wikidata for that article. Let me know if you want more fields and how you want them displayed. --
RexxS (
talk) 17:43, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
{{Sandbox/Infobox biosphere reserve |fetchwikidata = ALL}}
in
Moor House-Upper Teesdale for example, and also in
Braunton Burrows which doesn't have a UNESCO Biosphere URL in Wikidata. I imagine you'll most likely want the infobox for new articles to get them started, so have a think about which fields are likely to exist in Wikidata and I'll implement them for you. --
RexxS (
talk) 20:59, 1 June 2016 (UTC)@ RexxS:, amazing, I guess that means you fixed the issue for all coordinates in infoboxes? I am still importing information so I'll get back to you once I've done that about the fields. I've also been looking at Grade I and Grade II* listed buildings in the UK, there is a lot more information about many of them on Wikidata than Wikipedia (all the data was imported by Magnus last year). However I can't work out which infobox would work, they are all sorts of buildings, many of which have specific infoboxes e.g churches. The reason I'm asking is I'm working on this project which plans to import a lot of monument data into Wikidata from different countries around the world, it would be really cool to get something working to show how the data would be used on Wikipedia. What do you think would be the best approach to get the Wikidata fed infoboxes working for them? This page was helpful in seeing the difference in the amount of data on Wikipedia compared to Wikidata. -- John Cummings ( talk) 08:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
{{#invoke:Sandbox/RexxS/WdRefs|seeRefs}}
in an article. I can always add more fields to {{
Sandbox/Infobox biosphere reserve}} if you find ones that are commonly available in Wikidata. Just do some sampling and let me know. The best way to get started with Wikidata-enabled infoboxes is to select a few WikiProjects who are likely to be sympathetic and post at their talk page to arrange with them to conduct a trial. Say for example, that you get
Wikipedia:WikiProject Religious Buildings, Architecture and Monasticism interested; I'll make a modified version of {{
Infobox church}} and you/they can try it out on a few pages as a proof-of-concept. How does that sound? --
RexxS (
talk) 20:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
@ RexxS:, @ John Cummings::
Thanks, I did see the Open Source announcement via a couple of the mailing lists - that's what got me started building these. I don't think the Protected area Infobox is a perfect fit, and I agree with RexxS that we should consider a separate Infobox for UNESCO biosphere reserves. I do think we should allow for fields that users will add to WD.
So in addition to having fields for all of the data you listed above that you are importing, I think we should add:
(John, my thought is that a relief map is preferable since the biospheres are often based on geographic features.)
Maybe we should pose the question of what should be in a UNESCO BR Infobox on the project Talk page at Meta to get perspectives from some other folks working to complete these articles.
Thanks so much for getting these going! - PKM ( talk) 17:39, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
It's always better with a picture. Here's a rough mockup of my idea. I can annotate it with WD fields if that would be helpful. - PKM ( talk) 19:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
@ RexxS: I left a message on Wikipedia:WikiProject Religious Buildings, Architecture and Monasticism, however the Wikiproject has only two people in the list of participants who have not been active recently, many of the articles don't have infoboxes at all and the articles are often 2 sentences receiving 1 edit per year, in short there doesn't seem to be much of a community to ask. My feeling is that adding heritage status, coordinate location and national register number for the country it is in to Infobox:Church would probably be a sensible approach. John Cummings ( talk) 13:15, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi RexxS. If I wanted to do a comparison on a talk page between {{ Infobox person/Wikidata}} and a non-Wikidata infobox, is there a way to make the Wikidata box display properly? It threw up an error message when I tried it on Talk:James Cuthbert Smith, so I ended up doing a test diff as a workaround, which doesn't allow for the same side-by-side view that I was hoping for. Nikkimaria ( talk) 20:21, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
|parameter = -
to suppress Wikidata in each field you don't want. Personally I don't think it's a good idea to use that on infoboxes that will be used on large numbers of articles, because of the problem of 'silent' adding of fields when the upgrade is done. I mean, you don't want to make {{
Infobox person}} into a Wikidata-aware template using "opt-in" because you'll end up with hundreds of irate editors complaining about fields showing up that they don't want and don't know how to get rid of. It's ok when the infobox isn't used much as the editors doing the infobox upgrade can be expected to check all the articles transcluding it. Your idea of having a whitelist is a much better solution for heavily used infoboxes where each article needs the whitelist to be added before it fetches anything from Wikidata. --
RexxS (
talk) 13:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
{{Infobox book/Wikidata/Sandbox |fetchwikidata=ALL }}
in any book article to get a few fields as a demo (The infobox isn't finished yet!) --
RexxS (
talk) 15:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)Thanks for uploading File:Clark1974.svg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:14, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
MCEllis has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Thanks for staying up trying to fix the error I was getting with Module:Wikidata. I'm sure someone will figure it out tomorrow.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
Hi RexxS,
It was good to see you at the meetup yesterday.
You asked me to write here, asking for help with how to access the stuff that places delete tags. But coincidentally, yesterday evening, in this thread, I was advised to use "the DI tab". With some difficulty (it isn't a tab, and it usually doesn't exist) I managed to find it. It turns out that I've had twinkle installed for years, and had never noticed the TW tab. Maproom ( talk) 13:37, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
and, on the subject of discouraging new users from trying to create articles, I have collected some discussions at User:Maproom/New users and New articles. Cheers, Maproom ( talk) 17:46, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Hey RexxS. I've been reading along with your posts and work at Module:Wikidata. I am working on some modules that are tailored to some WP:VG purposes. We're looking to use Wikidata as a source for video game review scores and related data. This "VG Wikidata" if you will is at Module:Video game wikidata/sandbox and the template we are working on for integration is Template:Video game series reviews/sandbox and accompanying Module:Video game series reviews/sandbox. I was wondering if you might be so kind as to read over it and point out any obvious flaws. While I'm a programmer by trade, Lua is not one of my usual languages and I've only really used it here on Wikipedia. Plus I'm still learning Wikidata itself.
Following this experiment, I'll also be looking into integrating Module:Wikidata into Template:Infobox video game, though that will be with #invoke and not with a Lua module. -- ferret ( talk) 19:33, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
reference['snaks']['P577'][1]['datavalue']['value']['time']
may be written as reference.snaks.P577[1].datavalue.value.time
. That's only if it seems more natural to you, of course; I don't know your background, although the habit of terminating each statement with a semi-colon gives me some clues (Lua doesn't need them as I guess you know).Hi RexxS,
I've just translated this page into English but I first tried to use the Wikipedia translate tool and then things went horrendously wrong. I'll never do that again. The complete translated text won't be accepted. What should I do now? Thanks for your help; LouisAlain ( talk) 09:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
*Chevalier of the [[Legion of honour]] <ref>[https://archive.is/57qX8 ''Annuaires des titulaires de la Légion d'Honneur'']</ref>. was instantly blocked. LouisAlain ( talk) 16:50, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
[1] Yeah, I almost made that edit instead--general agreement that we should avoid columns for complex wikitext, since none of the nice browser columns templates are really meant for the complex stuff. -- Izno ( talk) 14:46, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi RexxS and sorry to bother you with a little fix that is needed on my talk page. A sysop from the French Wiki has just sent me a friendly message and I have answered him. Just, I've discovered that my T.P is now inundated with tons of texts whose origin is totaly incomprehensible for me and i'm not sure if my answer will be visible to my correspondent. Do you think you can help? Thanks in advance if you can do something about it. LouisAlain ( talk) 13:55, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
-)
which is a redirect to the article
Emoticon. As Iridescent said, when you wrote {{:-)}}
- which I guess you expected to be a template for the smiley face - it actually made a copy of the Emoticon article and placed it in your talk page. All fixed now, :-) --
RexxS (
talk) 14:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)I found an article that was using this template. I'm concerned as this is a test template. I became even more concerned at how many articles use it. I'm not sure what to do except to tell people not to use it. Any suggestions? Bgwhite ( talk) 22:53, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your helpful comments in the first FAC of Reger's Requiem. I try again, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:03, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for creating infobox horse trainer. It's something I have been wanting for a long time! White Arabian Filly Neigh 19:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC) |
Your input would be appreciated here. You might wanna skip past the bickering to my 21:14, 25 May 2016 (UTC) comment onwards. Izkala ( talk) 18:43, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi RexxS,
I've just translated that page only to find out that another Émile Moreau (writer) page exists which simply is entirely wrong and is based solely on IMDb which in turn is wrong of course. Sorry to bother you but imho the Émile Moreau (writer) article must be deleted. LouisAlain ( talk) 10:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Émile Moreau (writer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Émile Moreau (writer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yngvadottir ( talk) 18:51, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
You know, I wonder what would happen if I ran again. I haven't picked up any restraining orders or anything like that, in part because I only edit in trivial areas and never make any real decisions, but it's impossible to be here for a long time and not make enemies. Let's take Gamaliel, for instance: even if that April Fool's Day thing had never happened, enforcing ArbCom sanctions in Gamergate is just a guarantee he'd never pass RfA again, I think. Or what if I were some serious commafucker, wreaking havoc all over the MOS without ever using my bit for it. Would it not be possible for me to still be a fairly decent admin, even if I were restricted from that area? I think one of the problems here is that we generalize too quickly and don't easily allow common sense to play the appropriate part. Muse, muse, muse. Have a great day, Rexx--while you're turning something into an FA, I'll be, I don't know, playing with the kids some, in the pool. There's work horses and luxury horses, as the Dutch say. Drmies ( talk) 14:12, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
I see diving as a sport - even though it isn't, as far as I understand, competitive. Am I wrong? Rathfelder ( talk) 12:56, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
An arbitration case regarding Gamaliel and others has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi Rexx
I wanted to ask you about using your Wikidata infoboxes on Biosphere Reserve articles. UNESCO has made the descriptions of the Biosphere Reserves available under CC-BY-SA and I'm encouraging editors to create the articles for the missing sites, the instructions are here. There are currently 291 reserves with English Wikipedia articles and 374 without, I'm hoping that number will go down quickly. I wanted to ask you if it would possible and what would be the process of creating Wikidata fed infoboxes for these pages. The data in Wikidata for the sites has varying degrees of information, however all sites have the minimum of:
Some sites have a lot more information than this e.g Yellowstone National Park is a Biosphere Reserve.
Can you tell me what needs to happen to create the infoboxes? Also do you think this may be possible for Grade I and Grade 2* listed buildings in the UK? I know that there are items for all the sites on Wikidata because they were added for Wiki Loves Monuments, the same is true for all monuments in France.
Thanks
John Cummings ( talk) 09:38, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
{{Sandbox/Infobox biosphere reserve |fetchwikidata = ALL}}
into a section of an article like
Yellowstone National Park and preview it (please don't save!). You'll see some of the data available from Wikidata for that article. Let me know if you want more fields and how you want them displayed. --
RexxS (
talk) 17:43, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
{{Sandbox/Infobox biosphere reserve |fetchwikidata = ALL}}
in
Moor House-Upper Teesdale for example, and also in
Braunton Burrows which doesn't have a UNESCO Biosphere URL in Wikidata. I imagine you'll most likely want the infobox for new articles to get them started, so have a think about which fields are likely to exist in Wikidata and I'll implement them for you. --
RexxS (
talk) 20:59, 1 June 2016 (UTC)@ RexxS:, amazing, I guess that means you fixed the issue for all coordinates in infoboxes? I am still importing information so I'll get back to you once I've done that about the fields. I've also been looking at Grade I and Grade II* listed buildings in the UK, there is a lot more information about many of them on Wikidata than Wikipedia (all the data was imported by Magnus last year). However I can't work out which infobox would work, they are all sorts of buildings, many of which have specific infoboxes e.g churches. The reason I'm asking is I'm working on this project which plans to import a lot of monument data into Wikidata from different countries around the world, it would be really cool to get something working to show how the data would be used on Wikipedia. What do you think would be the best approach to get the Wikidata fed infoboxes working for them? This page was helpful in seeing the difference in the amount of data on Wikipedia compared to Wikidata. -- John Cummings ( talk) 08:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
{{#invoke:Sandbox/RexxS/WdRefs|seeRefs}}
in an article. I can always add more fields to {{
Sandbox/Infobox biosphere reserve}} if you find ones that are commonly available in Wikidata. Just do some sampling and let me know. The best way to get started with Wikidata-enabled infoboxes is to select a few WikiProjects who are likely to be sympathetic and post at their talk page to arrange with them to conduct a trial. Say for example, that you get
Wikipedia:WikiProject Religious Buildings, Architecture and Monasticism interested; I'll make a modified version of {{
Infobox church}} and you/they can try it out on a few pages as a proof-of-concept. How does that sound? --
RexxS (
talk) 20:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
@ RexxS:, @ John Cummings::
Thanks, I did see the Open Source announcement via a couple of the mailing lists - that's what got me started building these. I don't think the Protected area Infobox is a perfect fit, and I agree with RexxS that we should consider a separate Infobox for UNESCO biosphere reserves. I do think we should allow for fields that users will add to WD.
So in addition to having fields for all of the data you listed above that you are importing, I think we should add:
(John, my thought is that a relief map is preferable since the biospheres are often based on geographic features.)
Maybe we should pose the question of what should be in a UNESCO BR Infobox on the project Talk page at Meta to get perspectives from some other folks working to complete these articles.
Thanks so much for getting these going! - PKM ( talk) 17:39, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
It's always better with a picture. Here's a rough mockup of my idea. I can annotate it with WD fields if that would be helpful. - PKM ( talk) 19:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
@ RexxS: I left a message on Wikipedia:WikiProject Religious Buildings, Architecture and Monasticism, however the Wikiproject has only two people in the list of participants who have not been active recently, many of the articles don't have infoboxes at all and the articles are often 2 sentences receiving 1 edit per year, in short there doesn't seem to be much of a community to ask. My feeling is that adding heritage status, coordinate location and national register number for the country it is in to Infobox:Church would probably be a sensible approach. John Cummings ( talk) 13:15, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi RexxS. If I wanted to do a comparison on a talk page between {{ Infobox person/Wikidata}} and a non-Wikidata infobox, is there a way to make the Wikidata box display properly? It threw up an error message when I tried it on Talk:James Cuthbert Smith, so I ended up doing a test diff as a workaround, which doesn't allow for the same side-by-side view that I was hoping for. Nikkimaria ( talk) 20:21, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
|parameter = -
to suppress Wikidata in each field you don't want. Personally I don't think it's a good idea to use that on infoboxes that will be used on large numbers of articles, because of the problem of 'silent' adding of fields when the upgrade is done. I mean, you don't want to make {{
Infobox person}} into a Wikidata-aware template using "opt-in" because you'll end up with hundreds of irate editors complaining about fields showing up that they don't want and don't know how to get rid of. It's ok when the infobox isn't used much as the editors doing the infobox upgrade can be expected to check all the articles transcluding it. Your idea of having a whitelist is a much better solution for heavily used infoboxes where each article needs the whitelist to be added before it fetches anything from Wikidata. --
RexxS (
talk) 13:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
{{Infobox book/Wikidata/Sandbox |fetchwikidata=ALL }}
in any book article to get a few fields as a demo (The infobox isn't finished yet!) --
RexxS (
talk) 15:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)Thanks for uploading File:Clark1974.svg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:14, 22 June 2016 (UTC)