From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Hi, thanks for your message. This article is very frustrating. Basically one copyvio was placed over another copyvio. Which explains why there still was one left. I deleted the article and made it into a small stub. No copyvio there at all! Garion96 (talk) 17:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Chakyar Koothu

Hi, this is to inform you that the contents of the article Chakyar Koothu are original. Most of it was prepared by me only. The website that you are referring is pretty new one and they have extensively used wiki articles as resources. So i am removing the copy violation tag from the article.I appreciat your attempts. Thanking you Sreekanthv 04:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC) reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rajamankkan ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

shared system of an educational institution, the blocking admin should have looked at the contributions

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry confirmed by Checkuser Dmcdevit here. --  Netsnipe   ►  13:26, 2 May 2007 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Hi, thanks for your message. This article is very frustrating. Basically one copyvio was placed over another copyvio. Which explains why there still was one left. I deleted the article and made it into a small stub. No copyvio there at all! Garion96 (talk) 17:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Chakyar Koothu

Hi, this is to inform you that the contents of the article Chakyar Koothu are original. Most of it was prepared by me only. The website that you are referring is pretty new one and they have extensively used wiki articles as resources. So i am removing the copy violation tag from the article.I appreciat your attempts. Thanking you Sreekanthv 04:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC) reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rajamankkan ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

shared system of an educational institution, the blocking admin should have looked at the contributions

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry confirmed by Checkuser Dmcdevit here. --  Netsnipe   ►  13:26, 2 May 2007 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook