From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Orphaned non-free image File:Hank Williams.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hank Williams.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 00:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

"No. 5" on the charts?

That seems like a grave archaicism to me; Victorian or earlier. Nobody much uses that abbreviation any more, least of all in a country setting. I really think "#5" is more natural nowadays. -- Orange Mike | Talk 17:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the citation, even if I myself think the MOS is wrong on this. -- Orange Mike | Talk 12:56, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Orphaned non-free image File:Hank Williams.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hank Williams.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 00:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

"No. 5" on the charts?

That seems like a grave archaicism to me; Victorian or earlier. Nobody much uses that abbreviation any more, least of all in a country setting. I really think "#5" is more natural nowadays. -- Orange Mike | Talk 17:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the citation, even if I myself think the MOS is wrong on this. -- Orange Mike | Talk 12:56, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook