From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 70 Archive 73 Archive 74 Archive 75 Archive 76 Archive 77 Archive 80

Wikidata weekly summary #215

Primary School

Hello Andy

We had a meeting about the Primary School project during Wikimania, during which I expressed my wish to find solutions so that a bunch of articles considered of prime importance to primary school in South Africa, be improved in the next few months. Discott suggested that I contact editors involved in the various meetings, either in UK, or in New York or in Washington to see if some articles in my list could be the object of attention during locally held edit-a-thons. He particularly outlined that the London meetings were very well attended and quite frequent. Indeed, UK seems to organize meetings quite often. About half of the articles are pretty specific to South Africa but the other half are very generic articles. Various topics are covered, sometimes very well, sometimes not. For example Fire safety or gangster or Home safety requires much attention. Some are rather good articles, currently rated start such as Map. Do you think you could help us to improve some of the articles on the list ? Thanks Anthere ( talk)

@ Anthere: Great project! I'll raise it at the Wikimedia UK AGM, next month. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks Andy. Feel free to ask if you have any questions. Cheers. Anthere ( talk)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited We’re Here Because We’re Here (art event), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Theatre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:27, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #216

The Signpost: 04 July 2016

19:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXIII, July 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose ( talk) and Nick-D ( talk) 12:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

10 July

10 July

Took only 300 years to restore a good name. - Thank you for your work on the article. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

ORCID

Hi Andy; we met at the Wikimania lunch table in Esino Lario. Just a quick note that I didn't forget you asking about the status of ORCID in German-language Wikipedia; will check there and probably start a new discussion. It seems that the last ORCID discussion at de:Vorlage Diskussion:Normdaten was in 2014, started by you, with not a lot of participants (maybe because it was in English). Well, that was two years ago, there are now more Wikidata items with ORCID (but still not that many, it seems - 1152?)... we certainly can bring it up again. Gestumblindi ( talk) 10:38, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

@ Gestumblindi: Thank you - please do (and let me know when it's done). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:30, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Posted a proposal right now, see here (in German) :-) Gestumblindi ( talk) 22:17, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Response is rather negative. I tried summarizing the contra points brought up in English here, maybe you want to chime in... Gestumblindi ( talk) 23:07, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
@ Gestumblindi: Thank you again. I have replied there, but it's the same few objectors as last time, perhaps it needs a more widely-publicised discussion? There are now over 1200 ORCID iDs in Wikidata (and we know there are many still to be added). The last tome we discussed this in de.Wikipedia, I was told "try again when there are 1,000"! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:57, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Use of your sandbox

Hallo Andy,

may I use your sandbox tutorial as presented in Esio Lario? -- GOABahnmoeller ( talk) 19:50, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

@ GOABahnmoeller: It seems you already have done! Do feel free, but please change the name in the infobox. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

ECs

Hi Andy, We obviously both heard Woman's Hour re Kofoworola Abeni Pratt ... sorry for the Edit conflicts, have replaced some of your bits which I lost when I boldly added my version... got to go out now (village library closes shortly), so (a) no time to finish tidying up, but (b) I won't be conflicting with you for a while now. Together we're vastly improving her. Was going to look at using {{ Post-nominals}}. Wonder if there's an image of her anywhere? Cheers. Pam D 11:06, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

But then the heavens opened and the library can wait till afternoon ... found a full death date which disagrees with previous source! Trustee notice in Times, authoritative. Will add. Hope not to conflict. Looks as if she had an obit in Guardian - mentioned here. Pam D 11:34, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
@ PamD: No problem - edit conflicts are a part of Wikipedia's rich tapestry! You've found some good sources which I hadn't, so I'm glad you pitched in. I hope to have a copy of the Bell paper later today, so that should move things forward. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:49, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Guardian obit is tantalising, as it's too late for BL Newspapers (to 1950) and too early for Newsbank (1998- for Guardian) there's a 1950-1998 gap in access. Just discovered that Newsbank also has some Nigerian newspapers ... but only 2012-. Ah well. Pam D 12:04, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

River levels

Hi Andy,
It was good to chat to you yesterday. I've now been looking at the Environment Agency river levels data in more detail. Each monitoring station (usually measuring flow and/or level) has an ID, and there are parameters for the station's river and catchment. But as I feared, the river and catchment references in that dataset are just names without proper identifiers, so we probably can't use them in the rivers' Wikidata. See [3].
Do you think there should be a Wikidata item for each monitoring station (perhaps linked to wikidata:stream gauge), which can then reference the rivers' Wikidata? I guess linking these would be a semi-manual task. And then we can maybe start to think about how to link through to the actual level data, and incorporate that into the rivers' articles. It might be beyond me, and I'm starting to think that I'm trying to sprint before I can crawl.
Perhaps a simpler task to start me off would be to update river Wikidata with the WFD Waterbody ID. This is the reference number used by the EA for reporting under the Water Framework Directive (of course it's not used in the monitoring station dataset...). I think I'd need to create a new property for this, but I'm not quite sure how to do that.
Can you give me some pointers please? Thanks, Bazonka ( talk) 09:06, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

@ Bazonka: The first thing to try would be to ask the EA to start using their unique identifiers in their data sets! I can see us possibly having a Wikidata item for each monitoring station - but how many are there? I'd be happy to draft a proposal for a 'WFD Waterbody ID' property - is there a list online? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:28, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
@ Bazonka: Postscript: We already have wikidata:Property:P2856. Is this the same thing? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:48, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Yes, that's it! At least for the moment while we're still in the EU... I'm not sure whether they'll still be used when we leave. I'll put in a request for the IDs to be used but I'm not hopeful that anything will happen any time soon. I'll see what I can do though. There are about 2000 stations for monitoring river levels. Cheers, Bazonka ( talk) 18:52, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
@ Bazonka: Well that's good - one less job to do ;-) We now need to work out how best to model a single recording station - what properties, etc. We can then put the data together in a spreadsheet. So you have a list of the stations? And/or a single example in detail? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:57, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
There's an API containing near real-time data about and from the stations. See [4]. A JSON file listing all flow level stations can be generated with [5], so I guess it would be possible to do something with that. I think the (first) tricky part would be to link the stations to the rivers, and without the waterbody IDs in the data it could be a huge job to sort out.
Meanwhile, I've populated the Wikidata for the rivers on the Isle of Wight with the WFD Waterbody IDs. Some rivers are classed as more than one waterbody, e.g. Eastern Yar. Have I done this right? I did this manually, so it'll be another huge job to do the whole country like that. Bazonka ( talk) 20:50, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
@ Bazonka: As is so often the case with Wikidata, there is more then one way to do something, and neither is right or wrong. Yours is one way, the other is to create a Wikidata item for each thing that has a WFD ID, and mark them as "part of" the whole river. As you say this is too big to do manually (either way) and we may need a bot, or to use something like Mix'n'Match. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:32, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

15:15, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #217

This Month in GLAM: June 2016





Headlines

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Tech News: 2016-29

12:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 70 Archive 73 Archive 74 Archive 75 Archive 76 Archive 77 Archive 80

Wikidata weekly summary #215

Primary School

Hello Andy

We had a meeting about the Primary School project during Wikimania, during which I expressed my wish to find solutions so that a bunch of articles considered of prime importance to primary school in South Africa, be improved in the next few months. Discott suggested that I contact editors involved in the various meetings, either in UK, or in New York or in Washington to see if some articles in my list could be the object of attention during locally held edit-a-thons. He particularly outlined that the London meetings were very well attended and quite frequent. Indeed, UK seems to organize meetings quite often. About half of the articles are pretty specific to South Africa but the other half are very generic articles. Various topics are covered, sometimes very well, sometimes not. For example Fire safety or gangster or Home safety requires much attention. Some are rather good articles, currently rated start such as Map. Do you think you could help us to improve some of the articles on the list ? Thanks Anthere ( talk)

@ Anthere: Great project! I'll raise it at the Wikimedia UK AGM, next month. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks Andy. Feel free to ask if you have any questions. Cheers. Anthere ( talk)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited We’re Here Because We’re Here (art event), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Theatre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:27, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #216

The Signpost: 04 July 2016

19:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXIII, July 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose ( talk) and Nick-D ( talk) 12:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

10 July

10 July

Took only 300 years to restore a good name. - Thank you for your work on the article. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

ORCID

Hi Andy; we met at the Wikimania lunch table in Esino Lario. Just a quick note that I didn't forget you asking about the status of ORCID in German-language Wikipedia; will check there and probably start a new discussion. It seems that the last ORCID discussion at de:Vorlage Diskussion:Normdaten was in 2014, started by you, with not a lot of participants (maybe because it was in English). Well, that was two years ago, there are now more Wikidata items with ORCID (but still not that many, it seems - 1152?)... we certainly can bring it up again. Gestumblindi ( talk) 10:38, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

@ Gestumblindi: Thank you - please do (and let me know when it's done). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:30, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Posted a proposal right now, see here (in German) :-) Gestumblindi ( talk) 22:17, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Response is rather negative. I tried summarizing the contra points brought up in English here, maybe you want to chime in... Gestumblindi ( talk) 23:07, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
@ Gestumblindi: Thank you again. I have replied there, but it's the same few objectors as last time, perhaps it needs a more widely-publicised discussion? There are now over 1200 ORCID iDs in Wikidata (and we know there are many still to be added). The last tome we discussed this in de.Wikipedia, I was told "try again when there are 1,000"! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:57, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Use of your sandbox

Hallo Andy,

may I use your sandbox tutorial as presented in Esio Lario? -- GOABahnmoeller ( talk) 19:50, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

@ GOABahnmoeller: It seems you already have done! Do feel free, but please change the name in the infobox. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

ECs

Hi Andy, We obviously both heard Woman's Hour re Kofoworola Abeni Pratt ... sorry for the Edit conflicts, have replaced some of your bits which I lost when I boldly added my version... got to go out now (village library closes shortly), so (a) no time to finish tidying up, but (b) I won't be conflicting with you for a while now. Together we're vastly improving her. Was going to look at using {{ Post-nominals}}. Wonder if there's an image of her anywhere? Cheers. Pam D 11:06, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

But then the heavens opened and the library can wait till afternoon ... found a full death date which disagrees with previous source! Trustee notice in Times, authoritative. Will add. Hope not to conflict. Looks as if she had an obit in Guardian - mentioned here. Pam D 11:34, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
@ PamD: No problem - edit conflicts are a part of Wikipedia's rich tapestry! You've found some good sources which I hadn't, so I'm glad you pitched in. I hope to have a copy of the Bell paper later today, so that should move things forward. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:49, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Guardian obit is tantalising, as it's too late for BL Newspapers (to 1950) and too early for Newsbank (1998- for Guardian) there's a 1950-1998 gap in access. Just discovered that Newsbank also has some Nigerian newspapers ... but only 2012-. Ah well. Pam D 12:04, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

River levels

Hi Andy,
It was good to chat to you yesterday. I've now been looking at the Environment Agency river levels data in more detail. Each monitoring station (usually measuring flow and/or level) has an ID, and there are parameters for the station's river and catchment. But as I feared, the river and catchment references in that dataset are just names without proper identifiers, so we probably can't use them in the rivers' Wikidata. See [3].
Do you think there should be a Wikidata item for each monitoring station (perhaps linked to wikidata:stream gauge), which can then reference the rivers' Wikidata? I guess linking these would be a semi-manual task. And then we can maybe start to think about how to link through to the actual level data, and incorporate that into the rivers' articles. It might be beyond me, and I'm starting to think that I'm trying to sprint before I can crawl.
Perhaps a simpler task to start me off would be to update river Wikidata with the WFD Waterbody ID. This is the reference number used by the EA for reporting under the Water Framework Directive (of course it's not used in the monitoring station dataset...). I think I'd need to create a new property for this, but I'm not quite sure how to do that.
Can you give me some pointers please? Thanks, Bazonka ( talk) 09:06, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

@ Bazonka: The first thing to try would be to ask the EA to start using their unique identifiers in their data sets! I can see us possibly having a Wikidata item for each monitoring station - but how many are there? I'd be happy to draft a proposal for a 'WFD Waterbody ID' property - is there a list online? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:28, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
@ Bazonka: Postscript: We already have wikidata:Property:P2856. Is this the same thing? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:48, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Yes, that's it! At least for the moment while we're still in the EU... I'm not sure whether they'll still be used when we leave. I'll put in a request for the IDs to be used but I'm not hopeful that anything will happen any time soon. I'll see what I can do though. There are about 2000 stations for monitoring river levels. Cheers, Bazonka ( talk) 18:52, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
@ Bazonka: Well that's good - one less job to do ;-) We now need to work out how best to model a single recording station - what properties, etc. We can then put the data together in a spreadsheet. So you have a list of the stations? And/or a single example in detail? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:57, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
There's an API containing near real-time data about and from the stations. See [4]. A JSON file listing all flow level stations can be generated with [5], so I guess it would be possible to do something with that. I think the (first) tricky part would be to link the stations to the rivers, and without the waterbody IDs in the data it could be a huge job to sort out.
Meanwhile, I've populated the Wikidata for the rivers on the Isle of Wight with the WFD Waterbody IDs. Some rivers are classed as more than one waterbody, e.g. Eastern Yar. Have I done this right? I did this manually, so it'll be another huge job to do the whole country like that. Bazonka ( talk) 20:50, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
@ Bazonka: As is so often the case with Wikidata, there is more then one way to do something, and neither is right or wrong. Yours is one way, the other is to create a Wikidata item for each thing that has a WFD ID, and mark them as "part of" the whole river. As you say this is too big to do manually (either way) and we may need a bot, or to use something like Mix'n'Match. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:32, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

15:15, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #217

This Month in GLAM: June 2016





Headlines

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Tech News: 2016-29

12:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook