Welcome!
Hello, BadYodels, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Squash Racket 10:02, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi Philip, thanks for the message. I'm sorry but I cannot do that article now, maybe later. I don't have the sources to do it, on or offline. Btw, I love Costa Rica. Can I visit you there? ;-) Gregorik ( talk) 20:15, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
|
Hello, BadYodels, and welcome to WikiProject European Union! Thank you for your generous offer to help contribute. I'm sure your input will be much appreciated. I hope you enjoy contributing here and being a European Union Project Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to discuss anything on the project talk page, or to leave a message on my own talk page. Please remember to sign all your comments, and be bold with your edits. Again, welcome, and happy editing! |
|
- J Logan t: 20:09, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
The Hungarian passport article shows a map that is out of date. Since the end of October, Australia is also visafree with an eVisitor application. The map does not reflect this.
Please explain what you mean by the word trillion being "misused". -- Golbez ( talk) 17:26, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- You are quite wrong. 13 trillion (13,000,000,000,000, also known as 13,000 billion) divided by 300 million Americans (300,000,000) gives us around $40,000 earned per capita. If you use 13 billion, then you only get 40 bucks earned per capita, and I'm quite sure I made more than 40 dollars last year. -- Golbez ( talk) 21:52, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- I apologize. As you pointed out in your note to me, your second revision of the figures in question was technically accurate. Aside from that, the "erroneous information" tag unfortunately produces language referring to "vandalism"--I should have taken the time to edit that out, as of course, you are far from a vandal. However, (a) the reference to U.S. GDP in trillions is standard in American government sources and the American media and (b) you are incorrect when you say your version "follows the same scheme of all the other countries"--please see, for instance, Germany and Russia, whose GDP figures are also consistently expressed in the trillions. All the best, Dan.— DCGeist ( talk) 04:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. You might be interested in checking out the Wikipedia:Hungarian Wikipedians' notice board. All Wikipedians interested in Hungary or subjects somehow related to Hungary are invited to use this noticeboard as a tool for better organizing their activities, making announcements to others with similar interests, and discussing any actual issues related to their work on Wikipedia. You are welcome to add this notice board to your watchlist, so that you could see when it is updated and thus take part in any projects, initiatives, and improvements relating to articles about Hungary. Also, you are welcome to report your own articles here so they could be peer-reviewed and expanded by other contributors. Hobartimus ( talk) 07:32, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
The project page with a temporary design is set up at Wp:WikiProject Hungary. Hobartimus ( talk) 15:30, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:HungaryVisaFreeUpdated2.png. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:HungaryVisaFreeUpdated.png. The copy called Image:HungaryVisaFreeUpdated.png has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot ( talk) 04:00, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:HungaryVisaFreeMarch.png
Hi Philip200291!
We thank you for uploading
Image:HungaryVisaFreeMarch.png, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes
copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a
copyright tag, it may be
deleted by an
Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a
copyright tag to the
image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the
media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a
robot. --
John Bot III (
talk) 17:14, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi Philip200291! Can you update your map http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:VisaWaiverProgram.png and add Bulgaria to the list of candidates? I just updated the article and added the source: http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1213717127852.shtm.
Thanks in advance!
-- NeoOrpheus ( talk) 03:09, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
.png)
Hi! I put Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia and Kazakhstan to Europe because they are Council of Europe members (only Kazakhstan is a special guest). But you say most of their territory is in Asia. Cyprus and Armenia are 100% in Asia but you didn't put Armenia to Asia [1]. And Cyprus is in Europe in the article because of the EU. Turkey is a candidate to the EU, its largest city, cultural and financial capital Istanbul is in Europe. Also it is the largest city of Europe. We have to put them into Europe. Or we have to create new section called Eurasia in the article and Cyprus also must be there. I'm waiting your response. Lokum hi! 08:16, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I want to ask a question. Is this article geographical or political? If it is geographical, all these transcontinental countries must be in Eurasia, Cyprus and Armenia in Asia. If it is political all these transcontinental countries, Cyprus and Armenia must be in Europe. And you say Turkey is also politically Asian. Do you have evidences about this? But i have a lot of evidences about European Turkey. Western European and Others Group, WEU, Council of Europe, European Capital of Culture (Istanbul 2010), Eurovision 2004, Euro 2008, UEFA, FIBA Europe, Euroleague, European Olympic Committees, European Volleyball Championship, European Volleyball League, Champions League, EuroBasket,
Turkey is in Europe in Wikitravel.
Turkey is in the EU's context.
You can see Turkey is a part of Europe in European Environment Agency's website.
You can see Turkey in Europe not in Asia or Middle East in the BBC's website.
Tourism in Europe. You can see Turkey!
Europe's forecast. You can see Ankara's wheather :)
Also in IKEA's. and severel others. Լσκυм Ħί! 09:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'll create a new category called Eurasia and put all those countries there except Cyprus. Լσκυм Ħί! 04:13, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Philip! As I said in my edit summary, the H&P index was spam, and it was probably not correct in the first place. I just left the '101' and the 'citation needed' tag so that somebody else would eventually put in the correct number and give a proper reference. If you want to find out the exact number (it's probably more like 105 or 110, as you said) there are some websites that may be useful here and here; they should have current information. I would do it myself, but there are a lot of pages that need attention! Thanks for your contribution, - Gump Stump ( talk) 22:21, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi Philip!
I was just wondering whether the map of visa free travel for Hungarians should be updated. Australia is marked as one of the countries requiring visa for Hungarian citizens; however the official website of the Australian Embassy in Budapest says that visa free travel is available through the e-visitor program. I thought the update is necessary since there is no fees for this service and it is pretty much equivalent with ESTA, used by the United States of America. The U.S. is currently marked as a visa free destination for Hungarians, so I believe that Australia should be colored purple as well.
Thank You!
Sincerely,
Balazsm0496 ( talk) 19:04, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Your recent changes to Future enlargement of the European Union and Switzerland and the European Union
Hi there,
I just want to let you know that I have challenged your recent changes to Future enlargement of the European Union and Switzerland and the European Union. I think what you added is true, but regardless it should be sourced; not doing that the whole paragraph may be removed in the future. Can you please help us out and add sources for those two edits you made? If you need help adding sources, let me know.
Thanks, Miguel.mateo ( talk) 00:49, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
We are having problems to reach a stable consensus about removal of visa-free sections from the Passport articles. Please share your opinion with us here: Talk:Passport and here: a request for mediation Thanks. -- Ozguroot ( talk) 15:55, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
I have forwarded your request to Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Unblock. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 03:16, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- Instead of blocking the IP, the user could be given IP block exemption. — MC10 ( T• C• GB• L) 00:03, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- He/she has also been autoblocked numerous times in the past (scroll up to see) so IPBE would be helpful in future cases. — MC10 ( T• C• GB• L) 00:07, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
You say presidenta does not exist in Spanish.
But it does.
1. Presidenta yields 12,700,000 hits in Google, so very many people disagree with you.
2. If you use Google to search inside Costa Rica's La Nacion newspaper website, you find 3,090 presidentas inside that one newspaper. Like this.
One typical article in La Nacion has this headline: Costa Rica elige a su primera presidenta. See it here.
3. If you take that Spanish newspaper headline and give it to Google's translator, it recognises the word presidenta and translates the sentence as Costa Rica elects its first female president. The translator understands the word without difficulty.
4. I asked my Tica friend who is sitting in Moravia, San José right now, who is very gifted at languages, if the new president is called presidente or presidenta and she said, presidenta. That is a trusted, educated woman in Costa Rica whom I know personally whose first language is Spanish. I accept her answer as correct.
5. Spanish writers contributing to the Spanish Wikipedia page for Laura Chinchilla Miranda have put in the word presidenta eight times. See for yourself.
Conclusion: Yours is clearly a minority opinion, sir. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Odea (
talk •
contribs) 20:52, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for your agreement. Coincidentally, just now, I was reading about the Æ ligature to see if curriculum vitae could be spelled curriculum vitæ and that article linked to Wikipedia's article called Gender-neutrality in Spanish and Portuguese.
- There, I found these pertinent remarks:
- Presidenta used to be "the president's wife", but there have been several women presidents in Latin American republics, and in modern usage the word means mainly a female president. Some feel that presidente can be treated as invariable, given that it ends in -ente, but others prefer to use a different feminine form.
Hello. FYI, I reverted you here. If the new figure is indeed official, it can be reliably sourced. The ref currently in place puts it at 94.9 percent. Rivertorch ( talk) 03:30, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Philip200291. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Philip200291. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:HunVisaFreePremium.png
A tag has been placed on File:HunVisaFreePremium.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs ( talk) 11:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, BadYodels, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Squash Racket 10:02, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi Philip, thanks for the message. I'm sorry but I cannot do that article now, maybe later. I don't have the sources to do it, on or offline. Btw, I love Costa Rica. Can I visit you there? ;-) Gregorik ( talk) 20:15, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
|
|
Hello, BadYodels, and welcome to WikiProject European Union! Thank you for your generous offer to help contribute. I'm sure your input will be much appreciated. I hope you enjoy contributing here and being a European Union Project Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to discuss anything on the project talk page, or to leave a message on my own talk page. Please remember to sign all your comments, and be bold with your edits. Again, welcome, and happy editing! |
|
- J Logan t: 20:09, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
The Hungarian passport article shows a map that is out of date. Since the end of October, Australia is also visafree with an eVisitor application. The map does not reflect this.
Please explain what you mean by the word trillion being "misused". -- Golbez ( talk) 17:26, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- You are quite wrong. 13 trillion (13,000,000,000,000, also known as 13,000 billion) divided by 300 million Americans (300,000,000) gives us around $40,000 earned per capita. If you use 13 billion, then you only get 40 bucks earned per capita, and I'm quite sure I made more than 40 dollars last year. -- Golbez ( talk) 21:52, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- I apologize. As you pointed out in your note to me, your second revision of the figures in question was technically accurate. Aside from that, the "erroneous information" tag unfortunately produces language referring to "vandalism"--I should have taken the time to edit that out, as of course, you are far from a vandal. However, (a) the reference to U.S. GDP in trillions is standard in American government sources and the American media and (b) you are incorrect when you say your version "follows the same scheme of all the other countries"--please see, for instance, Germany and Russia, whose GDP figures are also consistently expressed in the trillions. All the best, Dan.— DCGeist ( talk) 04:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. You might be interested in checking out the Wikipedia:Hungarian Wikipedians' notice board. All Wikipedians interested in Hungary or subjects somehow related to Hungary are invited to use this noticeboard as a tool for better organizing their activities, making announcements to others with similar interests, and discussing any actual issues related to their work on Wikipedia. You are welcome to add this notice board to your watchlist, so that you could see when it is updated and thus take part in any projects, initiatives, and improvements relating to articles about Hungary. Also, you are welcome to report your own articles here so they could be peer-reviewed and expanded by other contributors. Hobartimus ( talk) 07:32, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
The project page with a temporary design is set up at Wp:WikiProject Hungary. Hobartimus ( talk) 15:30, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:HungaryVisaFreeUpdated2.png. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:HungaryVisaFreeUpdated.png. The copy called Image:HungaryVisaFreeUpdated.png has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot ( talk) 04:00, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:HungaryVisaFreeMarch.png
Hi Philip200291!
We thank you for uploading
Image:HungaryVisaFreeMarch.png, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes
copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a
copyright tag, it may be
deleted by an
Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a
copyright tag to the
image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the
media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a
robot. --
John Bot III (
talk) 17:14, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi Philip200291! Can you update your map http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:VisaWaiverProgram.png and add Bulgaria to the list of candidates? I just updated the article and added the source: http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1213717127852.shtm.
Thanks in advance!
-- NeoOrpheus ( talk) 03:09, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi! I put Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia and Kazakhstan to Europe because they are Council of Europe members (only Kazakhstan is a special guest). But you say most of their territory is in Asia. Cyprus and Armenia are 100% in Asia but you didn't put Armenia to Asia [1]. And Cyprus is in Europe in the article because of the EU. Turkey is a candidate to the EU, its largest city, cultural and financial capital Istanbul is in Europe. Also it is the largest city of Europe. We have to put them into Europe. Or we have to create new section called Eurasia in the article and Cyprus also must be there. I'm waiting your response. Lokum hi! 08:16, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I want to ask a question. Is this article geographical or political? If it is geographical, all these transcontinental countries must be in Eurasia, Cyprus and Armenia in Asia. If it is political all these transcontinental countries, Cyprus and Armenia must be in Europe. And you say Turkey is also politically Asian. Do you have evidences about this? But i have a lot of evidences about European Turkey. Western European and Others Group, WEU, Council of Europe, European Capital of Culture (Istanbul 2010), Eurovision 2004, Euro 2008, UEFA, FIBA Europe, Euroleague, European Olympic Committees, European Volleyball Championship, European Volleyball League, Champions League, EuroBasket,
Turkey is in Europe in Wikitravel.
Turkey is in the EU's context.
You can see Turkey is a part of Europe in European Environment Agency's website.
You can see Turkey in Europe not in Asia or Middle East in the BBC's website.
Tourism in Europe. You can see Turkey!
Europe's forecast. You can see Ankara's wheather :)
Also in IKEA's. and severel others. Լσκυм Ħί! 09:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'll create a new category called Eurasia and put all those countries there except Cyprus. Լσκυм Ħί! 04:13, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Philip! As I said in my edit summary, the H&P index was spam, and it was probably not correct in the first place. I just left the '101' and the 'citation needed' tag so that somebody else would eventually put in the correct number and give a proper reference. If you want to find out the exact number (it's probably more like 105 or 110, as you said) there are some websites that may be useful here and here; they should have current information. I would do it myself, but there are a lot of pages that need attention! Thanks for your contribution, - Gump Stump ( talk) 22:21, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi Philip!
I was just wondering whether the map of visa free travel for Hungarians should be updated. Australia is marked as one of the countries requiring visa for Hungarian citizens; however the official website of the Australian Embassy in Budapest says that visa free travel is available through the e-visitor program. I thought the update is necessary since there is no fees for this service and it is pretty much equivalent with ESTA, used by the United States of America. The U.S. is currently marked as a visa free destination for Hungarians, so I believe that Australia should be colored purple as well.
Thank You!
Sincerely,
Balazsm0496 ( talk) 19:04, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Your recent changes to Future enlargement of the European Union and Switzerland and the European Union
Hi there,
I just want to let you know that I have challenged your recent changes to Future enlargement of the European Union and Switzerland and the European Union. I think what you added is true, but regardless it should be sourced; not doing that the whole paragraph may be removed in the future. Can you please help us out and add sources for those two edits you made? If you need help adding sources, let me know.
Thanks, Miguel.mateo ( talk) 00:49, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
We are having problems to reach a stable consensus about removal of visa-free sections from the Passport articles. Please share your opinion with us here: Talk:Passport and here: a request for mediation Thanks. -- Ozguroot ( talk) 15:55, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
I have forwarded your request to Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Unblock. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 03:16, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- Instead of blocking the IP, the user could be given IP block exemption. — MC10 ( T• C• GB• L) 00:03, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- He/she has also been autoblocked numerous times in the past (scroll up to see) so IPBE would be helpful in future cases. — MC10 ( T• C• GB• L) 00:07, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
You say presidenta does not exist in Spanish.
But it does.
1. Presidenta yields 12,700,000 hits in Google, so very many people disagree with you.
2. If you use Google to search inside Costa Rica's La Nacion newspaper website, you find 3,090 presidentas inside that one newspaper. Like this.
One typical article in La Nacion has this headline: Costa Rica elige a su primera presidenta. See it here.
3. If you take that Spanish newspaper headline and give it to Google's translator, it recognises the word presidenta and translates the sentence as Costa Rica elects its first female president. The translator understands the word without difficulty.
4. I asked my Tica friend who is sitting in Moravia, San José right now, who is very gifted at languages, if the new president is called presidente or presidenta and she said, presidenta. That is a trusted, educated woman in Costa Rica whom I know personally whose first language is Spanish. I accept her answer as correct.
5. Spanish writers contributing to the Spanish Wikipedia page for Laura Chinchilla Miranda have put in the word presidenta eight times. See for yourself.
Conclusion: Yours is clearly a minority opinion, sir. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Odea (
talk •
contribs) 20:52, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for your agreement. Coincidentally, just now, I was reading about the Æ ligature to see if curriculum vitae could be spelled curriculum vitæ and that article linked to Wikipedia's article called Gender-neutrality in Spanish and Portuguese.
- There, I found these pertinent remarks:
- Presidenta used to be "the president's wife", but there have been several women presidents in Latin American republics, and in modern usage the word means mainly a female president. Some feel that presidente can be treated as invariable, given that it ends in -ente, but others prefer to use a different feminine form.
Hello. FYI, I reverted you here. If the new figure is indeed official, it can be reliably sourced. The ref currently in place puts it at 94.9 percent. Rivertorch ( talk) 03:30, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Philip200291. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Philip200291. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:HunVisaFreePremium.png
A tag has been placed on File:HunVisaFreePremium.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs ( talk) 11:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)