This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | → | Archive 29 |
According to this talk, Hughes has confirmed that File:Vanishing-venice.jpg has indeed been released by him, but the file description doesn't mention anything. Also, there should be a corresponding confirmation for File:Leaningrainbow.jpg, especially since the uploader is clearly not the artist. Paradoctor ( talk) 03:18, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
I notice you closed the RM on Catherine Ashton as no consensus. In this case, though, the current name was the name that the article was protected to after the move war, not the previous consensus version - that's why I did the the RM in that order. Obviously, protection does not imply an endorsement of the protected version.
Per these move logs: Catherine Ashton, Catherine Ashton, Baroness of Upholland, the most recent version that had consensus was Catherine Ashton, Baroness of Upholland. If there is no consensus, then surely the previous consensus name should be kept? Pfainuk talk 21:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
DYKadminBot hasn't updated in the past two days and seems to be down. In the past you could jumpstart the bot; do you still have access? Shubinator ( talk) 01:59, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
On the same topic, do you think it would be possible to have a backup bot that could be run manually if an admin requests it? Regards So Why 11:10, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Same ado, if its not difficult, could you please wake up the bot for the next update, 16:42 UTC, 5 December. If not, someone (not me) will hopefully update manually. For the update after that, I'm back on-line. Thank you. Materialscientist ( talk) 11:12, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello! Could you take a look at this again: the move was un-done. I muddled about trying to make order and then have un-done all my changes<g>. Thanks! jmcw ( talk) 13:45, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi again - if you have time, could you take a look at Takayuki Kubota and make any suggestions that occur to you? I am never sure what to do when AGF is gone. jmcw ( talk) 15:27, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello again! Somehow the talk page was moved back but not the article: [1]. Could re-adjust things? Thanks! jmcw ( talk) 19:29, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Can you please review your close of the move request there? I originally requested it as uncontroversial because the name I suggested was agreed upon in a prior move discussion. There was no discussion of a move to the current title and no discussion took place this time around, either. Thankyou. Srnec ( talk) 00:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Six days and about twelve hours. Well done! It looks like you were almost exactly spot on about how long it would last ;-) -- Deskana (talk) 11:38, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
What's with this Little Grape? 86.189.5.222 ( talk) 13:47, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Dear Administrator
Please review this page
http://www.deletionpedia.dbatley.com/?title=Tau_Alpha_Upsilon_(deleted_02_Jun_2008_at_22:16)
Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
I am an esteemed brother and current rush chair of SUNY Binghamton's oldest fraternity--Tau Alpha Upsilon. As the rush chair, it is my duty to make sure potential rushes/pledges are able to check the legitimacy of the fraternity, which in no doubt is legitimate as seen in SUNY Binghamton's website under the heading Tau Alpha Upsilon (
http://www2.binghamton.edu/volunteer/student-service-group.html). As a brother, it is my obligation to plea that you restore our page and bring some respectability back to our brotherhood. If the question in hand about the deletion of the page is about legitimacy, then there is no doubt that the fraternity is legitimate, and since we are only a local fraternity and the only existing chapter and Alpha Chapter, we cannot provide as many sources for the articles posted in the deleted page as most are kept in secrecy within the brothers. Should they be released, it would be impossible for Wikipedia to confirm if the source citation is reliable. This is primarily because the information sent out in the Tau Alpha Upsilon's wikipedia page came from the esteemed brothers of the Tau fraternity, and as such, are considered primary sources. I am begging you to restore our page in wikipedia. The respectability and recognition of our fraternity lies in your hands. Once again, if the question is about the legitimacy of the fraternity, I posted different links below to prove that our fraternity does in fact exist, and since it's the only existing chapter of said fraternity, every information posted on our page will be a Primary Source, and as such, be difficult to find an outside source. For further questions about the legitimacy of our fraternity, Wikipedia is more than welcome to call Binghamton University's President, Lois B. DeFleur. Thank you. Please feel free to contact me either in my Wikipedia account or at 24mariachi@gmail.com
In addition, we are also in one of you pages under the heading "Events Center" in this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binghamton_Bearcats
Here are the said articles.
http://alumni.binghamton.edu/AJ/2005/spring/takes.htm
http://www2.binghamton.edu/occ/greek-life/greek-orgs-list.html
http://www.taualphaupsilon.com/about.htm
http://taualphaupsilon.com/?page_id=5
http://www2.binghamton.edu/volunteer/student-service-group.html
http://www.bupipedream.com/Articles/Laughing-your-way-downtown-frat-hosts-comedic-professor/10407
http://bingfa.binghamton.edu/pdf/scholarships/Haran.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binghamton_Bearcats —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24mariachi ( talk • contribs) 00:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
You might want to say "closed early" rather than "closed prematurely" next time. It's just a matter of connotation, but to my ear at least, "closed early" suggests "closed before it would have been scheduled to close, whereas "closed prematurely" sounds more like "closed before it should have been closed," which is not at all the same thing. Regards, Newyorkbrad ( talk) 15:11, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
Where there is consensus on a page move, but there is a dispute over the target, it is usually better to allow the discusion to continue until a consensus on the target is reached, rather than end the discussion, as you did here at 1975–76 USSR Red Army ice hockey tour of North America.
Have a good day.-- SaskatchewanSenator ( talk) 17:55, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
I never marked it as vandalism, i just reverted it because it was false information. -- Dwayneflanders ( talk) 03:52, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for blocking User:JAF3993. Although maybe we got off to a bad start, he has consistently accused others of bullying and just abused his editing privileges. fetch comms ☛ 20:45, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi there,
I too had my suspicions that this account was a sock of Sarandioti. Excellent work. How did you figure that out? Did someone notify you? Was there an SPI filed? I'm asking because I would like to know the details of the case in case he comes back in the future (which I'm sure he will).
Hi Peter, thanks you for friendly advices, I try to patrol changes Related to Georgian football, but can you help me? I think that few seasons of Pirveli Liga must be deleted, but not to merged with Pirveli Liga. Please see Talk:Pirveli Liga 1990 and tell me what speedy delete reason I must give. Thanks P.S. Please forgive me for my bad English BRUTE ( talk) 17:09, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
I've put this on hold. Can you look at the edits? The user says it may just be a shared IP at a college, and the edits seem to have nothing in common with ResearchEditor. Daniel Case ( talk) 16:00, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Last summer, you blocked sock puppets for User:Excuseme99. I've tagged a new editor making similar types of edits to articles such as Natalie Wood and Kim Basinger. Red flags went off when I noticed the editor was editing content related to gay men Wood went out with and adding content to articles related to Lana Wood's book to various actor articles. I asked the editor about this and the comment was ignored. I think this is a WP:DUCK situation, personally. The username is User:Justppl. Thanks! Wildhartlivie ( talk) 19:08, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
May this season bring you joy and cheer Peter! --
Coffee //
have a cup //
ark // 00:28, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
I am letting you know as the user ( F'd to S C ( talk · contribs)) specifically named you in the vandalism (see diff) and one of the edits had the messasge "I'm back" - so you might be able to work out who it is!
Regards, -- PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 11:59, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
A Nobody
My talk is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
To those who make Good Arguments, who are appreciative, or supportive. Sincerely, -- A Nobody My talk 21:11, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
“ | And behold, he shall be born of Mary, at Jerusalem which is the land of our forefathers, she being a virgin, a precious and chosen vessel, who shall be overshadowed and conceive by the power of the Holy Ghost, and bring forth a son, yea, even the Son of God. | ” |
— (Alma 7:10) |
The Thing Merry Christmas is wishing you a Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:User:TTTSNB/Merry_Christmas}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
The Thing Merry Christmas 00:45, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | → | Archive 29 |
According to this talk, Hughes has confirmed that File:Vanishing-venice.jpg has indeed been released by him, but the file description doesn't mention anything. Also, there should be a corresponding confirmation for File:Leaningrainbow.jpg, especially since the uploader is clearly not the artist. Paradoctor ( talk) 03:18, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
I notice you closed the RM on Catherine Ashton as no consensus. In this case, though, the current name was the name that the article was protected to after the move war, not the previous consensus version - that's why I did the the RM in that order. Obviously, protection does not imply an endorsement of the protected version.
Per these move logs: Catherine Ashton, Catherine Ashton, Baroness of Upholland, the most recent version that had consensus was Catherine Ashton, Baroness of Upholland. If there is no consensus, then surely the previous consensus name should be kept? Pfainuk talk 21:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
DYKadminBot hasn't updated in the past two days and seems to be down. In the past you could jumpstart the bot; do you still have access? Shubinator ( talk) 01:59, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
On the same topic, do you think it would be possible to have a backup bot that could be run manually if an admin requests it? Regards So Why 11:10, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Same ado, if its not difficult, could you please wake up the bot for the next update, 16:42 UTC, 5 December. If not, someone (not me) will hopefully update manually. For the update after that, I'm back on-line. Thank you. Materialscientist ( talk) 11:12, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello! Could you take a look at this again: the move was un-done. I muddled about trying to make order and then have un-done all my changes<g>. Thanks! jmcw ( talk) 13:45, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi again - if you have time, could you take a look at Takayuki Kubota and make any suggestions that occur to you? I am never sure what to do when AGF is gone. jmcw ( talk) 15:27, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello again! Somehow the talk page was moved back but not the article: [1]. Could re-adjust things? Thanks! jmcw ( talk) 19:29, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Can you please review your close of the move request there? I originally requested it as uncontroversial because the name I suggested was agreed upon in a prior move discussion. There was no discussion of a move to the current title and no discussion took place this time around, either. Thankyou. Srnec ( talk) 00:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Six days and about twelve hours. Well done! It looks like you were almost exactly spot on about how long it would last ;-) -- Deskana (talk) 11:38, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
What's with this Little Grape? 86.189.5.222 ( talk) 13:47, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Dear Administrator
Please review this page
http://www.deletionpedia.dbatley.com/?title=Tau_Alpha_Upsilon_(deleted_02_Jun_2008_at_22:16)
Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
I am an esteemed brother and current rush chair of SUNY Binghamton's oldest fraternity--Tau Alpha Upsilon. As the rush chair, it is my duty to make sure potential rushes/pledges are able to check the legitimacy of the fraternity, which in no doubt is legitimate as seen in SUNY Binghamton's website under the heading Tau Alpha Upsilon (
http://www2.binghamton.edu/volunteer/student-service-group.html). As a brother, it is my obligation to plea that you restore our page and bring some respectability back to our brotherhood. If the question in hand about the deletion of the page is about legitimacy, then there is no doubt that the fraternity is legitimate, and since we are only a local fraternity and the only existing chapter and Alpha Chapter, we cannot provide as many sources for the articles posted in the deleted page as most are kept in secrecy within the brothers. Should they be released, it would be impossible for Wikipedia to confirm if the source citation is reliable. This is primarily because the information sent out in the Tau Alpha Upsilon's wikipedia page came from the esteemed brothers of the Tau fraternity, and as such, are considered primary sources. I am begging you to restore our page in wikipedia. The respectability and recognition of our fraternity lies in your hands. Once again, if the question is about the legitimacy of the fraternity, I posted different links below to prove that our fraternity does in fact exist, and since it's the only existing chapter of said fraternity, every information posted on our page will be a Primary Source, and as such, be difficult to find an outside source. For further questions about the legitimacy of our fraternity, Wikipedia is more than welcome to call Binghamton University's President, Lois B. DeFleur. Thank you. Please feel free to contact me either in my Wikipedia account or at 24mariachi@gmail.com
In addition, we are also in one of you pages under the heading "Events Center" in this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binghamton_Bearcats
Here are the said articles.
http://alumni.binghamton.edu/AJ/2005/spring/takes.htm
http://www2.binghamton.edu/occ/greek-life/greek-orgs-list.html
http://www.taualphaupsilon.com/about.htm
http://taualphaupsilon.com/?page_id=5
http://www2.binghamton.edu/volunteer/student-service-group.html
http://www.bupipedream.com/Articles/Laughing-your-way-downtown-frat-hosts-comedic-professor/10407
http://bingfa.binghamton.edu/pdf/scholarships/Haran.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binghamton_Bearcats —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24mariachi ( talk • contribs) 00:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
You might want to say "closed early" rather than "closed prematurely" next time. It's just a matter of connotation, but to my ear at least, "closed early" suggests "closed before it would have been scheduled to close, whereas "closed prematurely" sounds more like "closed before it should have been closed," which is not at all the same thing. Regards, Newyorkbrad ( talk) 15:11, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
Where there is consensus on a page move, but there is a dispute over the target, it is usually better to allow the discusion to continue until a consensus on the target is reached, rather than end the discussion, as you did here at 1975–76 USSR Red Army ice hockey tour of North America.
Have a good day.-- SaskatchewanSenator ( talk) 17:55, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
I never marked it as vandalism, i just reverted it because it was false information. -- Dwayneflanders ( talk) 03:52, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for blocking User:JAF3993. Although maybe we got off to a bad start, he has consistently accused others of bullying and just abused his editing privileges. fetch comms ☛ 20:45, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi there,
I too had my suspicions that this account was a sock of Sarandioti. Excellent work. How did you figure that out? Did someone notify you? Was there an SPI filed? I'm asking because I would like to know the details of the case in case he comes back in the future (which I'm sure he will).
Hi Peter, thanks you for friendly advices, I try to patrol changes Related to Georgian football, but can you help me? I think that few seasons of Pirveli Liga must be deleted, but not to merged with Pirveli Liga. Please see Talk:Pirveli Liga 1990 and tell me what speedy delete reason I must give. Thanks P.S. Please forgive me for my bad English BRUTE ( talk) 17:09, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
I've put this on hold. Can you look at the edits? The user says it may just be a shared IP at a college, and the edits seem to have nothing in common with ResearchEditor. Daniel Case ( talk) 16:00, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Last summer, you blocked sock puppets for User:Excuseme99. I've tagged a new editor making similar types of edits to articles such as Natalie Wood and Kim Basinger. Red flags went off when I noticed the editor was editing content related to gay men Wood went out with and adding content to articles related to Lana Wood's book to various actor articles. I asked the editor about this and the comment was ignored. I think this is a WP:DUCK situation, personally. The username is User:Justppl. Thanks! Wildhartlivie ( talk) 19:08, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
May this season bring you joy and cheer Peter! --
Coffee //
have a cup //
ark // 00:28, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
I am letting you know as the user ( F'd to S C ( talk · contribs)) specifically named you in the vandalism (see diff) and one of the edits had the messasge "I'm back" - so you might be able to work out who it is!
Regards, -- PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 11:59, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
A Nobody
My talk is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
To those who make Good Arguments, who are appreciative, or supportive. Sincerely, -- A Nobody My talk 21:11, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
“ | And behold, he shall be born of Mary, at Jerusalem which is the land of our forefathers, she being a virgin, a precious and chosen vessel, who shall be overshadowed and conceive by the power of the Holy Ghost, and bring forth a son, yea, even the Son of God. | ” |
— (Alma 7:10) |
The Thing Merry Christmas is wishing you a Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:User:TTTSNB/Merry_Christmas}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
The Thing Merry Christmas 00:45, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |