This is Omnibenevolence's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Theroadislong ( talk) 20:36, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi. I reverted your tag placement, mainly because the article is today's feature article and would be top clutter which could be handled later (maybe Thursday, when the article isn't listed on the past-feature que on the front page). But the lead seems fine to me, we really don't have to have just four paragraphs depending on size (that's just my personal opinion). Hopefully you understand. One thing in favor of keeping five paragraphs is that feature articles go through a rigorous process to get there, and if it came out of that with five paragraphs it was probably already looked at. Thanks, and have a great holiday-approaching Sunday. Randy Kryn ( talk) 14:05, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Even if it's commemorative and minted rarely for now, it's a legal tender. So the disruptive and destructive one could be you, not me
Or just answer for below of this and this. Onur T 21:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Please stop removing the names of places in Turkey in languages other than Turkish, as you have
here,
here,
here and other places. Wikipedia does not
prefer one language over another and per
MOS:LEADLANG, the addition of relevant foreign-language names [is] encouraged
. You're citing
MOS:LEADCLUTTER in this edits, but that guideline does not support them at all – it's about alternative spellings and other minor variations, not names in other languages. If the problem is length or 'clutter', you should move the other names to a footnote, not remove them. –
Joe (
talk) 14:56, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Kurds and Kurdistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
-- Ymblanter ( talk) 13:52, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding the issue discussed above. The thread is Removal of non-Turkish names by Omnibenevolence. Thank you. – Joe ( talk) 08:34, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template. Please also read the talk header section of pages in this topic area for possible additional information and editing restrictions. It does not appear that this notice has been posted to your talk page. If it has already been left already by another editor, please let me know. If you have questions, please request help at the Teahouse. // Timothy :: talk 13:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.This is Omnibenevolence's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Theroadislong ( talk) 20:36, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi. I reverted your tag placement, mainly because the article is today's feature article and would be top clutter which could be handled later (maybe Thursday, when the article isn't listed on the past-feature que on the front page). But the lead seems fine to me, we really don't have to have just four paragraphs depending on size (that's just my personal opinion). Hopefully you understand. One thing in favor of keeping five paragraphs is that feature articles go through a rigorous process to get there, and if it came out of that with five paragraphs it was probably already looked at. Thanks, and have a great holiday-approaching Sunday. Randy Kryn ( talk) 14:05, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Even if it's commemorative and minted rarely for now, it's a legal tender. So the disruptive and destructive one could be you, not me
Or just answer for below of this and this. Onur T 21:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Please stop removing the names of places in Turkey in languages other than Turkish, as you have
here,
here,
here and other places. Wikipedia does not
prefer one language over another and per
MOS:LEADLANG, the addition of relevant foreign-language names [is] encouraged
. You're citing
MOS:LEADCLUTTER in this edits, but that guideline does not support them at all – it's about alternative spellings and other minor variations, not names in other languages. If the problem is length or 'clutter', you should move the other names to a footnote, not remove them. –
Joe (
talk) 14:56, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Kurds and Kurdistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
-- Ymblanter ( talk) 13:52, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding the issue discussed above. The thread is Removal of non-Turkish names by Omnibenevolence. Thank you. – Joe ( talk) 08:34, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template. Please also read the talk header section of pages in this topic area for possible additional information and editing restrictions. It does not appear that this notice has been posted to your talk page. If it has already been left already by another editor, please let me know. If you have questions, please request help at the Teahouse. // Timothy :: talk 13:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.