From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2020

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Muammar Gaddafi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 01:37, 19 October 2020 (UTC) reply

How is this vandalism? The article was biased and I made an attempt to correct these biases. Western sources are not always reliable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oea the King ( talkcontribs)

Says who? D🐶ggy54321 ( let's chat!) 21:58, 19 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 02:02, 19 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Block evasion

Based on behavior, you are very obviously User talk:96.44.5.219. Therefore, you are still blocked. Creating anew account to circumvent a block is block evasion. You need to either appeal or wait-out your block before editing. Grayfell ( talk) 20:28, 19 October 2020 (UTC) reply

How am I some account in a different country? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oea the King ( talkcontribs)


Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/96.44.5.219. Breaking the three revert rule will only make your punishment bigger. Stop reverting my edits, because I can’t get in trouble per WP:EW (it says "The following reverts are exempt from the edit-warring policy:...sockpuppets of banned or blocked users", meaning I am completely exempted), but you still can. Stop evading your obvious block. D🐶ggy54321 ( let's chat!) 21:45, 19 October 2020 (UTC) reply

This is not me! Why am I being harassed by you and Grayfell? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oea the King ( talkcontribs)
Once again, have a look at WP:THICK. We are not harassing you. We are trying to keep Wikipedia from having another sockpuppet that’s active. If you can provide proof that it’s not you, that’s when I’ll actually value your comment and think of it as defending yourself. Just saying "It’s not me" isn’t helpful in the least. Criminals say "It’s not me" all the time, there are still lots of criminals in jail. D🐶ggy54321 ( let's chat!) 21:57, 19 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Controversial topic area alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

—  Newslinger  talk 05:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC) reply

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. —  Newslinger  talk 14:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 05:44, 20 October 2020 (UTC) reply

October 2020

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/96.44.5.219). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —  Newslinger  talk 13:59, 20 October 2020 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2020

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Muammar Gaddafi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 01:37, 19 October 2020 (UTC) reply

How is this vandalism? The article was biased and I made an attempt to correct these biases. Western sources are not always reliable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oea the King ( talkcontribs)

Says who? D🐶ggy54321 ( let's chat!) 21:58, 19 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 02:02, 19 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Block evasion

Based on behavior, you are very obviously User talk:96.44.5.219. Therefore, you are still blocked. Creating anew account to circumvent a block is block evasion. You need to either appeal or wait-out your block before editing. Grayfell ( talk) 20:28, 19 October 2020 (UTC) reply

How am I some account in a different country? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oea the King ( talkcontribs)


Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/96.44.5.219. Breaking the three revert rule will only make your punishment bigger. Stop reverting my edits, because I can’t get in trouble per WP:EW (it says "The following reverts are exempt from the edit-warring policy:...sockpuppets of banned or blocked users", meaning I am completely exempted), but you still can. Stop evading your obvious block. D🐶ggy54321 ( let's chat!) 21:45, 19 October 2020 (UTC) reply

This is not me! Why am I being harassed by you and Grayfell? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oea the King ( talkcontribs)
Once again, have a look at WP:THICK. We are not harassing you. We are trying to keep Wikipedia from having another sockpuppet that’s active. If you can provide proof that it’s not you, that’s when I’ll actually value your comment and think of it as defending yourself. Just saying "It’s not me" isn’t helpful in the least. Criminals say "It’s not me" all the time, there are still lots of criminals in jail. D🐶ggy54321 ( let's chat!) 21:57, 19 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Controversial topic area alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

—  Newslinger  talk 05:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC) reply

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. —  Newslinger  talk 14:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 05:44, 20 October 2020 (UTC) reply

October 2020

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/96.44.5.219). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —  Newslinger  talk 13:59, 20 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook