Are specifically against Wikipedia policy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_Links#Restrictions_on_linking Doceirias 22:28, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
You tagged Death Note (film) to be split into multiple articles. Can you give some indication at Talk:Death Note (film) about how you want this done? I cannot see any need for a split. Cheers. -- Alan Liefting ( talk) - 23:45, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
I linked WP:FUTFILMS in my edit summary. This "movie" is not happening and shouldn't have an article. Alientraveller ( talk) 07:30, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
I commend your rewriting and severely reducing the content of this article, it's needed someone to do it for a long time. However, I suspect it will be reverted by people who believe wikipedia is the place for excessive detail and fanboyism. Hopefully I'm proved wrong! Are you planning to continue this? The entire article needs a rewrite and proper referencing, and I have little faith in other people doing this (I personally am too busy, and others have shown their complete lack of understanding what was wrong with the article despite the tags) 23:33, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Dear Ode2Joy,
I apologize for reverting your copious Kubrick Edits, but there were at least three obvious problems. One is your version attributes the plot of "Killer's Kiss" to "Fear and Desire". That error was not present in the prior version of the article. Two: the correct usage is "1960s" not "1960's". Three: Generally pictures require some kind of caption. I didn't understand why you removed a few of these in toto. Other edits were pretty good, but I was being a bit lazy.
I can kinda/sorta see the basis for removing some material and stuff that seems a bit extraneous, such as the way "The Killing" influenced and foreshadowed Tarantino's style , but the material at the very start about Kubrick's notable style "scrupulous care with which he chose his subjects, his slow method of working" certainly belonged there, and I do not understand at all why that was deleted.--
WickerGuy (
talk) 16:55, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Why did you drop the Records section? Did you delete other material as well? -- Gwern (contribs) 02:09 29 March 2012 (GMT)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Fillmore! episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grand theft auto ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:27, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
I am alright with how you had the voice directors done in Marvel Anime, but we originally had the cast listed to list the voice actors involved in the show even though some of the roles are incomplete since G4 had done a commercial during the credits which even left the information at Internet Movie Database and Anime News Network incomplete as well. I don't mind that you list the Executive Producers of the projects in your next edit. Are you suggesting that you would like to sort the principal cast from the additional voices on the tables that you have established? Outside of that, I am hearing that Marvel Anime: Iron Man - Rise of the Technovore is coming out tomorrow. Rtkat3 ( talk) 7:19, April 15 2013 (UTC)
If you're still active on Eva 3.0: You can (not) redo, I need some help from you. The plot section is bloating because of an anonymous user. I've reverted his edits twice already, along with informing him of the word count limit, but he doesn't listen. This guy is showing signs of edit warring by always reverting my edits back, and I don't want to start an edit war. Now the article is full of fancruft and terms only Eva fans would understand, plus speculation besides. Can you help me convince this guy and undo the bloat? I know no one there, and it seems that you are the most active contributor. I would appreciate some help here. Greatly. Thank you. Anthonydraco ( talk) 21:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for coming. I notice that even though you filled the missing logical gaps. However, as you already know, some info not absolutely vital to understanding the plot needs to go, so I might need to cut down some. Some words flow better, but in places, we can still convey the same message with less words to conform with the limit. I do not have time to continue the work tonight, but the part that most certainly have to go is here: "EVA pilots like them do not grow older due to the curse of the EVA." I've already explained this to the IP anon, but I would like to point this out to you again. "The curse of the EVA" explains nothing here, and it has to go. It's just a mysterious term that offers no concrete information. And it's already implied at the beginning of that sentence that because they're EVA pilots, they don't grow older. It's very obvious EVAs are the cause.
- I will also need to get rid of parenthetic clauses and break open the parentheses to create open-line prose. The parenthetic clauses read out of place in your additions, and it kinda read as if we don't care to integrate the information into the prose outside. I'm going to fix that, but I'm informing you first. Anthonydraco ( talk) 16:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Glossary of Please Save My Earth for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glossary of Please Save My Earth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glossary of Please Save My Earth until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN ( talk) 20:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Floral emblem may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- and floral emblem of Bangladesh is the [[Shapla]] ({{lang-bn|শাপলা''}}) or [[Nymphaea nouchali]] )<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.pmo.gov.bd/constitution/part1.htm |title=Constitution of Bangladesh
- ====Taiwan (Republic of China====
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:33, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Ode2joy, I'm confused about your edit [1] to Be Cool, Scooby-Doo!. I watched the episode last night, so I know it aired yesterday. What do you mean by "updating the air date?" Thanks! Katniss ♥ 14:42, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Ode2joy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Why were my lists for the Pajama Sam characters deleted?! I wanted to put them down to give people info about the characters. While I'm still working on Pajama Sam 4, I find almost everything except the main characters list was deleted! Who did that and why did they do it? My information was accurate. I cited sources to prove it was. Now, all that work I did to improve the "Pajama Sam" page has been for nothing! 2603:6010:8B45:FA00:79AA:2B3:E1CC:5209 ( talk) 17:36, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
The article Ore (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unreferenced article, a quick Google search doesn't give sources that proves the album's notability. Note that the Japanese version of the article is currently a redirect to the band.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Spinixster
(chat!) 14:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
The article WAO!! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unreferenced article, a quick Google search doesn't give sources that proves the album's notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Spinixster
(chat!) 12:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Are specifically against Wikipedia policy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_Links#Restrictions_on_linking Doceirias 22:28, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
You tagged Death Note (film) to be split into multiple articles. Can you give some indication at Talk:Death Note (film) about how you want this done? I cannot see any need for a split. Cheers. -- Alan Liefting ( talk) - 23:45, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
I linked WP:FUTFILMS in my edit summary. This "movie" is not happening and shouldn't have an article. Alientraveller ( talk) 07:30, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
I commend your rewriting and severely reducing the content of this article, it's needed someone to do it for a long time. However, I suspect it will be reverted by people who believe wikipedia is the place for excessive detail and fanboyism. Hopefully I'm proved wrong! Are you planning to continue this? The entire article needs a rewrite and proper referencing, and I have little faith in other people doing this (I personally am too busy, and others have shown their complete lack of understanding what was wrong with the article despite the tags) 23:33, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Dear Ode2Joy,
I apologize for reverting your copious Kubrick Edits, but there were at least three obvious problems. One is your version attributes the plot of "Killer's Kiss" to "Fear and Desire". That error was not present in the prior version of the article. Two: the correct usage is "1960s" not "1960's". Three: Generally pictures require some kind of caption. I didn't understand why you removed a few of these in toto. Other edits were pretty good, but I was being a bit lazy.
I can kinda/sorta see the basis for removing some material and stuff that seems a bit extraneous, such as the way "The Killing" influenced and foreshadowed Tarantino's style , but the material at the very start about Kubrick's notable style "scrupulous care with which he chose his subjects, his slow method of working" certainly belonged there, and I do not understand at all why that was deleted.--
WickerGuy (
talk) 16:55, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Why did you drop the Records section? Did you delete other material as well? -- Gwern (contribs) 02:09 29 March 2012 (GMT)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Fillmore! episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grand theft auto ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:27, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
I am alright with how you had the voice directors done in Marvel Anime, but we originally had the cast listed to list the voice actors involved in the show even though some of the roles are incomplete since G4 had done a commercial during the credits which even left the information at Internet Movie Database and Anime News Network incomplete as well. I don't mind that you list the Executive Producers of the projects in your next edit. Are you suggesting that you would like to sort the principal cast from the additional voices on the tables that you have established? Outside of that, I am hearing that Marvel Anime: Iron Man - Rise of the Technovore is coming out tomorrow. Rtkat3 ( talk) 7:19, April 15 2013 (UTC)
If you're still active on Eva 3.0: You can (not) redo, I need some help from you. The plot section is bloating because of an anonymous user. I've reverted his edits twice already, along with informing him of the word count limit, but he doesn't listen. This guy is showing signs of edit warring by always reverting my edits back, and I don't want to start an edit war. Now the article is full of fancruft and terms only Eva fans would understand, plus speculation besides. Can you help me convince this guy and undo the bloat? I know no one there, and it seems that you are the most active contributor. I would appreciate some help here. Greatly. Thank you. Anthonydraco ( talk) 21:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for coming. I notice that even though you filled the missing logical gaps. However, as you already know, some info not absolutely vital to understanding the plot needs to go, so I might need to cut down some. Some words flow better, but in places, we can still convey the same message with less words to conform with the limit. I do not have time to continue the work tonight, but the part that most certainly have to go is here: "EVA pilots like them do not grow older due to the curse of the EVA." I've already explained this to the IP anon, but I would like to point this out to you again. "The curse of the EVA" explains nothing here, and it has to go. It's just a mysterious term that offers no concrete information. And it's already implied at the beginning of that sentence that because they're EVA pilots, they don't grow older. It's very obvious EVAs are the cause.
- I will also need to get rid of parenthetic clauses and break open the parentheses to create open-line prose. The parenthetic clauses read out of place in your additions, and it kinda read as if we don't care to integrate the information into the prose outside. I'm going to fix that, but I'm informing you first. Anthonydraco ( talk) 16:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Glossary of Please Save My Earth for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glossary of Please Save My Earth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glossary of Please Save My Earth until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN ( talk) 20:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Floral emblem may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- and floral emblem of Bangladesh is the [[Shapla]] ({{lang-bn|শাপলা''}}) or [[Nymphaea nouchali]] )<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.pmo.gov.bd/constitution/part1.htm |title=Constitution of Bangladesh
- ====Taiwan (Republic of China====
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:33, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Ode2joy, I'm confused about your edit [1] to Be Cool, Scooby-Doo!. I watched the episode last night, so I know it aired yesterday. What do you mean by "updating the air date?" Thanks! Katniss ♥ 14:42, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Ode2joy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Why were my lists for the Pajama Sam characters deleted?! I wanted to put them down to give people info about the characters. While I'm still working on Pajama Sam 4, I find almost everything except the main characters list was deleted! Who did that and why did they do it? My information was accurate. I cited sources to prove it was. Now, all that work I did to improve the "Pajama Sam" page has been for nothing! 2603:6010:8B45:FA00:79AA:2B3:E1CC:5209 ( talk) 17:36, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
The article Ore (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unreferenced article, a quick Google search doesn't give sources that proves the album's notability. Note that the Japanese version of the article is currently a redirect to the band.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Spinixster
(chat!) 14:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
The article WAO!! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unreferenced article, a quick Google search doesn't give sources that proves the album's notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Spinixster
(chat!) 12:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC)