|
|
Hi Ninos2576! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
Elizium23. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
List of ethnic Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Elizium23 (
talk) 20:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
List of ethnic Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Elizium23 (
talk) 20:51, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I believe the issue before was not that I didn't include a reliable source, but rather that a source wasn't included at all. However, I have added a reliable source to my previous edit. Thank you again. Ninos2576 ( talk) 06:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.
Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.
Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.
If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.
Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.
If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.
I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. -- Hipal/Ronz ( talk) 17:39, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for creating the page Iraqi Christian Relief Council. In it you have listed many sources but have used naked url's which are both unsightly and problematic. If somebody else wants to follow a link to the source a naked URL is not a user-friendly way to get here. Please could you take a look at the info on how to cite sources, Wikipedia:Citing sources and the tutorial. I see other editors have mentioned this to you before.
Please also have a look at Wikipedia:Single-purpose account.
Once again, thanks for the new page and Welcome to Wikipedia! Wyatt Tyrone Smith ( talk) 16:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your edit on the Tyari page. Away Inn ( talk) 23:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
You are welcome! Ninos2576 ( talk) 06:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ninos2576! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. You mark almost all of your edits as "minor". Please only do so for really basic things like correcting a misspelling or fixing punctuation.
Schazjmd
(talk) 14:39, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for letting me know. Will be sure to fix that in the future Ninos2576 ( talk) 15:43, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
You were warned by Hipal previously. I am repeating it: do not add unreliable sources such as Twitter posts by ordinary accounts, circular references, unreliable websites, YouTube accounts, and so forth; do not cherry pick or falsify them, and take a look at neutral point of view policy of Wikipedia. Persistent additions of unreliable sources and slow-burning edit wars to keep your preferred version of pages as you did in F. Murray Abraham and more recently in Peshmerga are disruptive.-- 217.131.86.187 ( talk) 14:20, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Assyrian Policy Institute, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:22, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Atour Sargon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atour Sargon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atour Sargon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon ( talk) 17:56, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, I modified your second comment on WP:Articles for deletion/Atour Sargon. You can only enter keep or delete once in a discussion, so I changed your second keep to comment. Schazjmd (talk) 18:13, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Puduḫepa 05:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 | Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The inhabitants of osroene was mainly arameans, greeks and parthians. The king abgar might have been arab. I am not a patriot, l am neutral and open minded. According to simo parpola they had an assyrian identity, now should we trust him? l would say yes because we know that the arameans worshipped mesopotamian gods. And our church fathers accepted both aramean and assyrian for our identity. Now how trustworthy were our church fathers, well, not very much but they could have documents describing the syriac people as arameans or assyrians, but what we know from other historians during this time we have been called both arameans and assyrian, while l mostly accept the assyrian identity because it was our last true empire. But back to my question, do you think that the kingdom of osroene should be written as our kingdom, for mostly they were aramean and other mixes, and other people can say its their kingdom? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemrud91 ( talk • contribs) 21:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
|
|
|
Hi Ninos2576! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
Elizium23. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
List of ethnic Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Elizium23 (
talk) 20:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
List of ethnic Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Elizium23 (
talk) 20:51, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I believe the issue before was not that I didn't include a reliable source, but rather that a source wasn't included at all. However, I have added a reliable source to my previous edit. Thank you again. Ninos2576 ( talk) 06:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.
Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.
Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.
If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.
Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.
If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.
I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. -- Hipal/Ronz ( talk) 17:39, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for creating the page Iraqi Christian Relief Council. In it you have listed many sources but have used naked url's which are both unsightly and problematic. If somebody else wants to follow a link to the source a naked URL is not a user-friendly way to get here. Please could you take a look at the info on how to cite sources, Wikipedia:Citing sources and the tutorial. I see other editors have mentioned this to you before.
Please also have a look at Wikipedia:Single-purpose account.
Once again, thanks for the new page and Welcome to Wikipedia! Wyatt Tyrone Smith ( talk) 16:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your edit on the Tyari page. Away Inn ( talk) 23:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
You are welcome! Ninos2576 ( talk) 06:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ninos2576! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. You mark almost all of your edits as "minor". Please only do so for really basic things like correcting a misspelling or fixing punctuation.
Schazjmd
(talk) 14:39, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for letting me know. Will be sure to fix that in the future Ninos2576 ( talk) 15:43, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
You were warned by Hipal previously. I am repeating it: do not add unreliable sources such as Twitter posts by ordinary accounts, circular references, unreliable websites, YouTube accounts, and so forth; do not cherry pick or falsify them, and take a look at neutral point of view policy of Wikipedia. Persistent additions of unreliable sources and slow-burning edit wars to keep your preferred version of pages as you did in F. Murray Abraham and more recently in Peshmerga are disruptive.-- 217.131.86.187 ( talk) 14:20, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Assyrian Policy Institute, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:22, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Atour Sargon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atour Sargon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atour Sargon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon ( talk) 17:56, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, I modified your second comment on WP:Articles for deletion/Atour Sargon. You can only enter keep or delete once in a discussion, so I changed your second keep to comment. Schazjmd (talk) 18:13, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Puduḫepa 05:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The inhabitants of osroene was mainly arameans, greeks and parthians. The king abgar might have been arab. I am not a patriot, l am neutral and open minded. According to simo parpola they had an assyrian identity, now should we trust him? l would say yes because we know that the arameans worshipped mesopotamian gods. And our church fathers accepted both aramean and assyrian for our identity. Now how trustworthy were our church fathers, well, not very much but they could have documents describing the syriac people as arameans or assyrians, but what we know from other historians during this time we have been called both arameans and assyrian, while l mostly accept the assyrian identity because it was our last true empire. But back to my question, do you think that the kingdom of osroene should be written as our kingdom, for mostly they were aramean and other mixes, and other people can say its their kingdom? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemrud91 ( talk • contribs) 21:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)