This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Please stay away from templates for a while. An infobox for franchises is really unnecessary and esoteric, and a template just for your user talk page is highly unnecessary. Please work on writing articles and not making them prettier or easier to navigate with templates.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍) 07:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
I honestly don't remember, since this was two years ago. I just recall that I was editing with only my IP for some time (a few months at least, possibly more) before I finally registered this account. Arrowned ( talk) 05:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
I think you should just move the thing and change all the pages to reflect the new template name. You know, WP:BE BOLD and all. Serves me well, at least. If the usual template format would have an infobox for a character have "character" in the name, then move it, since you're obviously correct in your thinking on this matter. Just be exceedingly thorough, and make sure you change every last page. Howa0082 ( talk) 15:11, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
An editor has nominated User:Mythdon/user info, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User:Mythdon/user info and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 02:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
User:Mythdon/user info, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mythdon/user info and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Mythdon/user info during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 02:41, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
You listed this in the wrong venue -- userspace should be taken to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion instead. I've transferred the listing for you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 02:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Over the past months, TV episodes have been redirected by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [1]. Even if you have not, other opinions are needed because this issue is affecting all TV episodes in Wikipedia. -- Maniwar ( talk) 16:27, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
that means there is not decision to delete, and if ppl want to merge, they should hold a separate discussion on the talk pages, as appropriate. -- Y not be working? 19:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
It's pronounced My-Zoo, I think you spelled it My-Zu in that pronounciation, if I might ask, why do you ask? XD Myzou ( talk) 05:28, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated List of The Steve Wilkos Show episodes, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Steve Wilkos Show episodes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TrU Co 9311 17:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm tired of doing this in that short little line.
We do not need to continually update an episode number in that infobox. That section is either for series that are over or series that are known to have a set amount of episodes. It is easier to just say "This series is ongoing" rather than working on updating that one number every episode airing. It also gets confusing when there are more episodes in a section rather than in that little number. Right now, we have five episode titles, but we're only saying that there are three episodes? That is why it is easier to say "Ongoing" rather than a definite number.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 05:57, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Another editor has added the {{
prod}}
template to the article
Sally Campbell, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and
Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at
its talk page. If you remove the {{
prod}}
template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
BJBot (
talk) 00:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Please stay away from templates for a while. An infobox for franchises is really unnecessary and esoteric, and a template just for your user talk page is highly unnecessary. Please work on writing articles and not making them prettier or easier to navigate with templates.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍) 07:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
I honestly don't remember, since this was two years ago. I just recall that I was editing with only my IP for some time (a few months at least, possibly more) before I finally registered this account. Arrowned ( talk) 05:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
I think you should just move the thing and change all the pages to reflect the new template name. You know, WP:BE BOLD and all. Serves me well, at least. If the usual template format would have an infobox for a character have "character" in the name, then move it, since you're obviously correct in your thinking on this matter. Just be exceedingly thorough, and make sure you change every last page. Howa0082 ( talk) 15:11, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
An editor has nominated User:Mythdon/user info, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User:Mythdon/user info and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 02:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
User:Mythdon/user info, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mythdon/user info and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Mythdon/user info during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 02:41, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
You listed this in the wrong venue -- userspace should be taken to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion instead. I've transferred the listing for you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 02:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Over the past months, TV episodes have been redirected by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [1]. Even if you have not, other opinions are needed because this issue is affecting all TV episodes in Wikipedia. -- Maniwar ( talk) 16:27, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
that means there is not decision to delete, and if ppl want to merge, they should hold a separate discussion on the talk pages, as appropriate. -- Y not be working? 19:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
It's pronounced My-Zoo, I think you spelled it My-Zu in that pronounciation, if I might ask, why do you ask? XD Myzou ( talk) 05:28, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated List of The Steve Wilkos Show episodes, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Steve Wilkos Show episodes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TrU Co 9311 17:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm tired of doing this in that short little line.
We do not need to continually update an episode number in that infobox. That section is either for series that are over or series that are known to have a set amount of episodes. It is easier to just say "This series is ongoing" rather than working on updating that one number every episode airing. It also gets confusing when there are more episodes in a section rather than in that little number. Right now, we have five episode titles, but we're only saying that there are three episodes? That is why it is easier to say "Ongoing" rather than a definite number.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 05:57, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Another editor has added the {{
prod}}
template to the article
Sally Campbell, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and
Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at
its talk page. If you remove the {{
prod}}
template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
BJBot (
talk) 00:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)