Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Wind turbine syndrome seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Please see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#Wind turbine syndrome. Articles must not include editorial commentary but that can readily be cleaned up. However WP:RS (reliable sources) are needed to support statements in articles, and WP:MEDRS (medical reliable sources) are needed for statements about health. Johnuniq ( talk) 02:02, 25 January 2017 (UTC) reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Someguy1221 ( talk) 04:14, 25 January 2017 (UTC) reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Wind turbine syndrome. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:19, 25 January 2017 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent tendentious editing and edit warring at Wind turbine syndrome, ignoring warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Bishonen | talk 15:48, 25 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Your past comments are now at Talk:Wind turbine syndrome/Archive 1. The person who archived it did not put a link to the archive page at Talk:Wind turbine syndrome but I have now added a link. Roberttherambler ( talk) 16:56, 3 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Per the clear consensus in this ANI discussion you have been indefinitely topic banned from any and all articles or talk page discussions relating to wind energy, broadly construed. This, of course, includes Wind turbine syndrome. While you are free to remove this notice the ban remains in place until such time as you are specifically informed by the community that it has been modified or removed. Failure to adhere to this ban may result in additional sanctions, not excluding an indefinite block. Details on how to appeal this topic ban can be found here: Wikipedia:Banning_policy#Appeals_of_bans_imposed_by_the_community -- NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:05, 4 February 2017 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 months for for violating your topic ban here and here. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued violations of your community-imposed topic ban from "any and all articles or talk page discussions relating to wind energy, broadly construed," as MWest55 ( talk · contribs).

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   GAB ^gab 01:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC) reply