See help:referencing for beginners. I would recommend using a citation wp:template such as {{ cite web}}, {{ cite journal}} (magazines), {{ cite book}}, etc. You can easily format a reference with wp:RefToolbar/2.0 which as at the top of the default Wikipedia editor under "> Cite" Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 06:56, 2 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cynthia Slater and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cynthia Slater, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong ( talk) 08:32, 2 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, Mr Kalm! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong ( talk) 08:32, 2 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi Mr Kalm, I wanted to let you know why I altered your edit to Larry Olsen. First, since there are several 'Larry Olsen''s, the name has to be disambiguated by adding something like '(Society of Janus)' after his name. Otherwise, the link is identical to the name of the disambiguation page, and that is confusing. Second, red links should only be used on disambiguation pages when the linked article also has a red link for that item. Society of Janus does not have a red link for Larry Olsen (qualifier), and it doesn't appear likely that there will be an article written about him anytime soon, so I removed the red link on the disambiguation page. Leschnei ( talk) 23:13, 2 November 2018 (UTC) reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cynthia Slater. Thanks! Robert McClenon ( talk) 05:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This draft appears to be about two topics, Cynthia Slater and The Society of Janus. Please focus on one topic. (Perhaps the use of an oversized subhead makes it appear to have two topics.)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cynthia Slater and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cynthia Slater, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon ( talk) 05:37, 10 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cynthia Slater and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cynthia Slater, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae ( talk) 16:00, 28 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Society of Janus. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Not clear she is independently notable from the organization.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cynthia Slater and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cynthia Slater, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 22:10, 12 July 2019 (UTC) reply

An article in mainspace, like List of sexology topics, isn't the right place to record notes on article development, such as an emergent topic that will need updates soon and being transferred from Sex and the law. I suggest you move your article to draftspace to continue working on it. Schazjmd  (talk) 23:11, 23 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Removed the offensive material. I'll put it elsewhere in The future, and keep the page where it is. Mr Kalm ( talk) 23:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Removed the offensive material. I'll put it elsewhere in The future, and keep the page where it is. Mr Kalm ( talk) 23:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cynthia Slater and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cynthia Slater, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 23:42, 23 September 2019 (UTC) reply

This has already been rejected for that reason, corrected, then rejected for another reason. At least have the decency to pretend to reject me for something new. Mr Kalm ( talk) 00:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC) reply

I reference you to 'Non-notable? Deletion, Devaluation, and Discrimination on Wikipedia' Francesca Tripodi — University of Virginia. I accuse you and the various talking heads above you of this discriminatory nonsense. I shall pursue this at a higher level. Mr Kalm ( talk) 00:16, 24 September 2019 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Larry Olsen (SOJ) is, in its current state, incomplete as written to remain published. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption—there, you can complete the article properly. When you feel the article is complete and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – eggofreason^{( talk · contribs)} 18:08, 3 July 2019 (UTC) Thanks! Sorry, my edit deleted for some reason - I probably didnt save it properly. I'll update asap. Mr Kalm ( talk) 23:27, 24 September 2019 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of sexology topics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sexology topics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -Crossroads- ( talk) 21:22, 29 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Cynthia Slater, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:21, 24 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Larry Olsen (SOJ), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:27, 10 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, Mr Kalm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Larry Olsen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 14:30, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply