Please stop restoring non-free content to pages that are outside of the mainspace, as you did here. The use of non-free images in such a place is strictly forbidden by WP:NFCC #9. Thank you, -- Hammersoft ( talk) 20:17, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- And despite the above warning, you've done it again. Why? If you persist in doing this, I will recommend you be blocked from editing until such time as you agree to abide by our policies. If you have questions, ask. Ignoring this policy and editing in violation of it is NOT an option. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 20:39, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
|
نشان اصلی |
| و تو که لوری علی ساکی لرستانی ( talk) 18:27, 4 October 2013 (UTC) |
- دسات درد نهکه هوم زوو -- Meysam.ebrahimi ( talk) 17:03, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Asalamalikum Dear Wikipedian,
I'm Hooperag, a fellow Wikipedian of yours and a fellow Muslim of yours. In this email I would like to ask for your support in my efforts to bring proper respect to Prophet Muhammad and the religion of Islam in Wikipedia articles.
Recently I have been working on articles about religious figures of Islam like Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib (a.s.), and Imam Hussain ibn Ali (a.s.), in these articles have added appropriate terms for their respect like changing "Muhammad" to "Prophet Muhammad" and such... As in Islam we are obliged to mention these people’s names with respect, this must also reflect in text.
Unfortunately, however some Wikipedia editors are undoing all these efforts with the claim that such honorary prefixes are biased and violating of Wikipedia’s neutrality. This however could not be farther from the truth.
There are 1.6 billion Muslims on this planet, over 23% of the world’s total population. Tens of thousands of Wikipedia editors are Muslims and hundreds of thousands of Wikipedia readers are Muslims. With so many Muslims how can we let our beloved prophet and his companions be disrespected on the world’s largest encyclopedia?
Wikipedia claims they maintain such a policy to support freedom of speech and fight censorship. However I say that this gives no right for disrespect towards 1.6 billion humans’ prophet and religion. If we are to let things continue like this we will only find our religion and prophet further disrespected on Wikipedia in the coming times.
Things don’t need to be this way. I request your support as a fellow Muslim to voice your support for the usage of respectful terminology regarding the religion of Islam and Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) on Wikipedia.
Please visit the following link: [
Link] and visit the section titled “Request for Respect of our Religion and our Prophet”. Once you are there comment and voice your support!
Please pass this message to as many Wikipedians as you know!
WaalaikumSalam
Hooperag (
talk) 01:03, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello! A user by the name of "Semsûrî" is removing Lurish language and adding Kurdish as the language of Lorestan province. his reference is a Kurdish news article that has nothing to do with Lorestan being Kurdish. /info/en/?search=Lorestan_Province Please help stop his vandalism and false information.
He's also using a bot to revert edits automatically. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emblemmor ( talk • contribs) 16:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emblemmor ( talk • contribs) 16:37, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. El_C 20:35, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- @
El C: Hello, this is a joke ?! Why did you block me? I have more than 13,000 edits in wikifa and due to multiple accounts have you blocked me in English wiki? This is against Wikipedia rules. About my latest edition, The language of the people of Lorestan is Lori, not Kurdish! And if you do not act, I will sue you :)
Meysam (
talk) 07:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- @
El C: Mr. Che Guevara. Do you want to answer or not?
Meysam (
talk) 09:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- To what end? Why would I repeat what I've already written directly above? Also, I do not respond to threats, legal or otherwise.
El_C 12:37, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- @
El C:You blocked me because of multiple accounts. I have only had one Wikipedia account in 12 years! You are responsible for your decisions. You have to be accountable.
Meysam (
talk) 16:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Ah. As I note above, the block was due to ethno-national disruption. The block log now reflects that.
El_C 16:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- @
El C:You blocked me for [
this edit] How much do you know about Iran and Lorestan province and have you read about it? Base on
lori-dialects and
lori-language-ii in
Encyclopædia Iranica The language of the people of Lorestan province is Lori and not Kurdish! Different articles about Lorestan may be written in many languages. But there is no reason for the name of this province to be written in that language! You do not allow proper editing. Why? --
Meysam (
talk) 17:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- The extent of my knowledge about that is hardly the point (though I did see that the Hebrew Wikipedia notes both Kurdish and Lori). You joined an edit war alongside a disruptive user. And you did so without any explanation whatsoever. Your edit also removed "Kurds" from Lak, again, without any explanation whatsoever. I deem that to be suspect and disruptive. Then, once blocked, you threaten me with a lawsuit if I do not "act" (act how?), and now you expect allowances somehow? I say no to that. El_C 17:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- @
El C:You blocked me for [
this edit] How much do you know about Iran and Lorestan province and have you read about it? Base on
lori-dialects and
lori-language-ii in
Encyclopædia Iranica The language of the people of Lorestan province is Lori and not Kurdish! Different articles about Lorestan may be written in many languages. But there is no reason for the name of this province to be written in that language! You do not allow proper editing. Why? --
Meysam (
talk) 17:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Ah. As I note above, the block was due to ethno-national disruption. The block log now reflects that.
El_C 16:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- @
El C:You blocked me because of multiple accounts. I have only had one Wikipedia account in 12 years! You are responsible for your decisions. You have to be accountable.
Meysam (
talk) 16:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- To what end? Why would I repeat what I've already written directly above? Also, I do not respond to threats, legal or otherwise.
El_C 12:37, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- @
El C: Mr. Che Guevara. Do you want to answer or not?
Meysam (
talk) 09:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
@ El C:My English language is weak and I get help from Google Trans, maybe you did not understand what I mean. I apologize. But, with respect, your knowledge of Laki language is limited. Laks say (اوستان) And Kurds say (پارێزگای) The two are completely different. I was asked to help (see above) I do not usually edit in English Wikipedia and you are expected to prevent forgery. Thank You -- Meysam ( talk) 20:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Look, it is really your responsibility to check whether the editor requesting help from you is legit, which this one clearly wasn't. Also, I'm not sure how poor mastery of the English language could make
if you do not act, I will sue you
read as anything but an unambiguous legal threat. Finally, I don't believe further discussion about the content is germane to our immediate purposes here, nor do I see what my (admittedly) limited knowledge therein has to do with anything. El_C 00:55, 9 January 2021 (UTC)- @ El C:You are responsible for your own behavior. There is no compelling reason to block me. Just because of an edit! I repeat, if you do not take action, I will sue you. You have access to encyclopedia progress, not unreasonably blocking users. First you said how many usernames you have, you said again you were in an editorial war! You can not tell the difference between Laki and Kurdish. Edit by source, not your own. Meysam ( talk) 14:46, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Talk page access revoked
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
You are, of course, free to seek any legal recourse or remedy you see fit, but you are not allowed to continue editing any part of the Wikipedia website while the legal dispute remains outstanding or otherwise unresolved. El_C 17:51, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
I will copy this to your talk page to make easier reading.
As I see it, there are two reason for your block. Edit warring and making a legal threat. (We really do not care what Iranica encyclopedia or Persian Wikipedia say.) You edit warred to have your way with the article. That was a content dispute. Please see the boilerplate that follows.
Please see our policy on edit warring ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Edit_warring). In the event of a content dispute ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution), editors are required to stop reverting, discuss ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:BOLD,_revert,_discuss_cycle), and seek consensus ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Consensus) among editors on the relevant talk page. If discussions reach an impasse, editors can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Noticeboards) and/or seek dispute resolution ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution).
Points to ponder:
- Edit warring is wrong even if one is right.
- Any arguments in favor of one's preferred version should be made on the relevant talk page and not in an unblock appeal.
- Calling attention to the faults of others is never a successful strategy; one must address one's own behavior
And you wrote, "And if you do not act, I will sue you." That's a legal threat. While seeking legal action off Wiki is your right, you may not edit here until the legal action is withdrawn or concluded.
Per /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:No_legal_threats
Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:24, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Do not post legal threats on Wikipedia. A legal threat, in this context, is a threat to engage in an external (real life) legal or other governmental process that would target other editors. It does not refer to any dispute-resolution process within Wikipedia. Users who post legal threats on Wikipedia are typically blocked from editing while the threats are outstanding. While you may sue in a court of law, Wikipedia is not the place for legal disputes. Posting legal threats on Wikipedia is uncivil and can cause serious problems:
It severely inhibits free editing of pages, a concept that is absolutely necessary to ensure that Wikipedia remains neutral. Without this freedom, we risk one side of a dispute intimidating the other, thus causing a systemic bias in our articles. It creates bad feelings and a lack of trust within the community, damaging our ability to proceed quickly and efficiently with an assumption of mutual good faith. We have had bad experiences with users who have posted legal threats in the past; by doing so, you may damage your reputation on Wikipedia. Attempting to resolve disputes using the dispute resolution procedures will often lead to a solution without resorting to the law. If the dispute resolution procedures do not resolve your problem, and you then choose to take legal action, you do so in the knowledge that you took all reasonable steps to resolve the situation amicably.
To prevent damage to the project, this policy temporarily removes from participation in the community editors who post legal threats on Wikipedia. The editor is not blocked just because "it's a legal threat", but because the block:
- reduces scope for escalation of a bad situation,
- reduces stress and administrative burden on the wiki,
- reduces disruption to articles and the editorial environment,
- prevents a situation in which someone seeks to be a collaborative partner, while posting as if they were a legal adversary.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Please stop restoring non-free content to pages that are outside of the mainspace, as you did here. The use of non-free images in such a place is strictly forbidden by WP:NFCC #9. Thank you, -- Hammersoft ( talk) 20:17, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- And despite the above warning, you've done it again. Why? If you persist in doing this, I will recommend you be blocked from editing until such time as you agree to abide by our policies. If you have questions, ask. Ignoring this policy and editing in violation of it is NOT an option. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 20:39, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
|
|
نشان اصلی |
| و تو که لوری علی ساکی لرستانی ( talk) 18:27, 4 October 2013 (UTC) |
- دسات درد نهکه هوم زوو -- Meysam.ebrahimi ( talk) 17:03, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Asalamalikum Dear Wikipedian,
I'm Hooperag, a fellow Wikipedian of yours and a fellow Muslim of yours. In this email I would like to ask for your support in my efforts to bring proper respect to Prophet Muhammad and the religion of Islam in Wikipedia articles.
Recently I have been working on articles about religious figures of Islam like Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib (a.s.), and Imam Hussain ibn Ali (a.s.), in these articles have added appropriate terms for their respect like changing "Muhammad" to "Prophet Muhammad" and such... As in Islam we are obliged to mention these people’s names with respect, this must also reflect in text.
Unfortunately, however some Wikipedia editors are undoing all these efforts with the claim that such honorary prefixes are biased and violating of Wikipedia’s neutrality. This however could not be farther from the truth.
There are 1.6 billion Muslims on this planet, over 23% of the world’s total population. Tens of thousands of Wikipedia editors are Muslims and hundreds of thousands of Wikipedia readers are Muslims. With so many Muslims how can we let our beloved prophet and his companions be disrespected on the world’s largest encyclopedia?
Wikipedia claims they maintain such a policy to support freedom of speech and fight censorship. However I say that this gives no right for disrespect towards 1.6 billion humans’ prophet and religion. If we are to let things continue like this we will only find our religion and prophet further disrespected on Wikipedia in the coming times.
Things don’t need to be this way. I request your support as a fellow Muslim to voice your support for the usage of respectful terminology regarding the religion of Islam and Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) on Wikipedia.
Please visit the following link: [
Link] and visit the section titled “Request for Respect of our Religion and our Prophet”. Once you are there comment and voice your support!
Please pass this message to as many Wikipedians as you know!
WaalaikumSalam
Hooperag (
talk) 01:03, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello! A user by the name of "Semsûrî" is removing Lurish language and adding Kurdish as the language of Lorestan province. his reference is a Kurdish news article that has nothing to do with Lorestan being Kurdish. /info/en/?search=Lorestan_Province Please help stop his vandalism and false information.
He's also using a bot to revert edits automatically. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emblemmor ( talk • contribs) 16:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emblemmor ( talk • contribs) 16:37, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. El_C 20:35, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- @
El C: Hello, this is a joke ?! Why did you block me? I have more than 13,000 edits in wikifa and due to multiple accounts have you blocked me in English wiki? This is against Wikipedia rules. About my latest edition, The language of the people of Lorestan is Lori, not Kurdish! And if you do not act, I will sue you :)
Meysam (
talk) 07:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- @
El C: Mr. Che Guevara. Do you want to answer or not?
Meysam (
talk) 09:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- To what end? Why would I repeat what I've already written directly above? Also, I do not respond to threats, legal or otherwise.
El_C 12:37, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- @
El C:You blocked me because of multiple accounts. I have only had one Wikipedia account in 12 years! You are responsible for your decisions. You have to be accountable.
Meysam (
talk) 16:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Ah. As I note above, the block was due to ethno-national disruption. The block log now reflects that.
El_C 16:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- @
El C:You blocked me for [
this edit] How much do you know about Iran and Lorestan province and have you read about it? Base on
lori-dialects and
lori-language-ii in
Encyclopædia Iranica The language of the people of Lorestan province is Lori and not Kurdish! Different articles about Lorestan may be written in many languages. But there is no reason for the name of this province to be written in that language! You do not allow proper editing. Why? --
Meysam (
talk) 17:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- The extent of my knowledge about that is hardly the point (though I did see that the Hebrew Wikipedia notes both Kurdish and Lori). You joined an edit war alongside a disruptive user. And you did so without any explanation whatsoever. Your edit also removed "Kurds" from Lak, again, without any explanation whatsoever. I deem that to be suspect and disruptive. Then, once blocked, you threaten me with a lawsuit if I do not "act" (act how?), and now you expect allowances somehow? I say no to that. El_C 17:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- @
El C:You blocked me for [
this edit] How much do you know about Iran and Lorestan province and have you read about it? Base on
lori-dialects and
lori-language-ii in
Encyclopædia Iranica The language of the people of Lorestan province is Lori and not Kurdish! Different articles about Lorestan may be written in many languages. But there is no reason for the name of this province to be written in that language! You do not allow proper editing. Why? --
Meysam (
talk) 17:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Ah. As I note above, the block was due to ethno-national disruption. The block log now reflects that.
El_C 16:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- @
El C:You blocked me because of multiple accounts. I have only had one Wikipedia account in 12 years! You are responsible for your decisions. You have to be accountable.
Meysam (
talk) 16:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- To what end? Why would I repeat what I've already written directly above? Also, I do not respond to threats, legal or otherwise.
El_C 12:37, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- @
El C: Mr. Che Guevara. Do you want to answer or not?
Meysam (
talk) 09:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
@ El C:My English language is weak and I get help from Google Trans, maybe you did not understand what I mean. I apologize. But, with respect, your knowledge of Laki language is limited. Laks say (اوستان) And Kurds say (پارێزگای) The two are completely different. I was asked to help (see above) I do not usually edit in English Wikipedia and you are expected to prevent forgery. Thank You -- Meysam ( talk) 20:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Look, it is really your responsibility to check whether the editor requesting help from you is legit, which this one clearly wasn't. Also, I'm not sure how poor mastery of the English language could make
if you do not act, I will sue you
read as anything but an unambiguous legal threat. Finally, I don't believe further discussion about the content is germane to our immediate purposes here, nor do I see what my (admittedly) limited knowledge therein has to do with anything. El_C 00:55, 9 January 2021 (UTC)- @ El C:You are responsible for your own behavior. There is no compelling reason to block me. Just because of an edit! I repeat, if you do not take action, I will sue you. You have access to encyclopedia progress, not unreasonably blocking users. First you said how many usernames you have, you said again you were in an editorial war! You can not tell the difference between Laki and Kurdish. Edit by source, not your own. Meysam ( talk) 14:46, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Talk page access revoked
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
You are, of course, free to seek any legal recourse or remedy you see fit, but you are not allowed to continue editing any part of the Wikipedia website while the legal dispute remains outstanding or otherwise unresolved. El_C 17:51, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
I will copy this to your talk page to make easier reading.
As I see it, there are two reason for your block. Edit warring and making a legal threat. (We really do not care what Iranica encyclopedia or Persian Wikipedia say.) You edit warred to have your way with the article. That was a content dispute. Please see the boilerplate that follows.
Please see our policy on edit warring ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Edit_warring). In the event of a content dispute ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution), editors are required to stop reverting, discuss ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:BOLD,_revert,_discuss_cycle), and seek consensus ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Consensus) among editors on the relevant talk page. If discussions reach an impasse, editors can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Noticeboards) and/or seek dispute resolution ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution).
Points to ponder:
- Edit warring is wrong even if one is right.
- Any arguments in favor of one's preferred version should be made on the relevant talk page and not in an unblock appeal.
- Calling attention to the faults of others is never a successful strategy; one must address one's own behavior
And you wrote, "And if you do not act, I will sue you." That's a legal threat. While seeking legal action off Wiki is your right, you may not edit here until the legal action is withdrawn or concluded.
Per /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:No_legal_threats
Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:24, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Do not post legal threats on Wikipedia. A legal threat, in this context, is a threat to engage in an external (real life) legal or other governmental process that would target other editors. It does not refer to any dispute-resolution process within Wikipedia. Users who post legal threats on Wikipedia are typically blocked from editing while the threats are outstanding. While you may sue in a court of law, Wikipedia is not the place for legal disputes. Posting legal threats on Wikipedia is uncivil and can cause serious problems:
It severely inhibits free editing of pages, a concept that is absolutely necessary to ensure that Wikipedia remains neutral. Without this freedom, we risk one side of a dispute intimidating the other, thus causing a systemic bias in our articles. It creates bad feelings and a lack of trust within the community, damaging our ability to proceed quickly and efficiently with an assumption of mutual good faith. We have had bad experiences with users who have posted legal threats in the past; by doing so, you may damage your reputation on Wikipedia. Attempting to resolve disputes using the dispute resolution procedures will often lead to a solution without resorting to the law. If the dispute resolution procedures do not resolve your problem, and you then choose to take legal action, you do so in the knowledge that you took all reasonable steps to resolve the situation amicably.
To prevent damage to the project, this policy temporarily removes from participation in the community editors who post legal threats on Wikipedia. The editor is not blocked just because "it's a legal threat", but because the block:
- reduces scope for escalation of a bad situation,
- reduces stress and administrative burden on the wiki,
- reduces disruption to articles and the editorial environment,
- prevents a situation in which someone seeks to be a collaborative partner, while posting as if they were a legal adversary.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________