From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ein Naqquba

Hello. You should have seen the notice when you were editing the page, but you are not allowed to edit articles like this until you "have at least 500 edits and 30 days' tenure" (see the notice on the talk page titled "WARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES". If you continue to edit it while not meeting these criteria, you will be blocked. Furthermore, the edits were not helpful – firstly it's confusing to readers as many would assume a "Palestinian village" would be one in the Palestinian territories, and secondly, not all Arabs in Israel identify as Palestinian. Hence why the article on them is located at Arab citizens of Israel. Cheers, Number 5 7 08:14, 17 June 2021 (UTC) reply

As you've ignored the warning above, I've requested action be taken against you. See Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Mercrediaankijker. Number 5 7 09:39, 17 June 2021 (UTC) reply

June 2021

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Ein Naqquba shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Drill it ( talk) 10:19, 17 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Black Kite (talk) 10:28, 17 June 2021 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ein Naqquba

Hello. You should have seen the notice when you were editing the page, but you are not allowed to edit articles like this until you "have at least 500 edits and 30 days' tenure" (see the notice on the talk page titled "WARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES". If you continue to edit it while not meeting these criteria, you will be blocked. Furthermore, the edits were not helpful – firstly it's confusing to readers as many would assume a "Palestinian village" would be one in the Palestinian territories, and secondly, not all Arabs in Israel identify as Palestinian. Hence why the article on them is located at Arab citizens of Israel. Cheers, Number 5 7 08:14, 17 June 2021 (UTC) reply

As you've ignored the warning above, I've requested action be taken against you. See Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Mercrediaankijker. Number 5 7 09:39, 17 June 2021 (UTC) reply

June 2021

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Ein Naqquba shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Drill it ( talk) 10:19, 17 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Black Kite (talk) 10:28, 17 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook