This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | → | Archive 30 |
You removed an edit I made on iresq page. There would be no possible way to provide a reliable source. The only source I have is my employment at this facility. No other documentation exist for this subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neotronics ( talk • contribs) 02:52, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
How would I make my previous content a reliable source due to the fact that the previous comment "In February 2009, iResQ announced that it was partnering with a local recycling facility that redistributes surplus electronics to nonprofit organizations. It will also have its cardboard and paper waste processed.[6] " with the provided note [6] was from 2009 and no official record that this action is present at this time to hold note [6] to an absolute fact. The wikipedia only states " that redistributes surplus electronics to nonprofit organizations. It will also have its cardboard and paper waste processed" and nothing providing to my previous content providing only about E-waste. This feels to me to be a conflict. I provided content about E-waste as I am a content creator due to me physically working there to an article from seven years ago that can not be established or proven to the current time frame. I would like to add that from what I have seen on wikipedia many of the content is suggestive to be others opinions. I just wanted to state a fact. So my question would be how to make my content a reliable source? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Neotronics (
talk •
contribs) 04:19, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. Yes my removal of the Orwell reference was a mistake, whilst I was adjusting new references. By restoring the text, however, the additions I made have been removed, and I'm not clear how to easily restore them without repeating the error. Jfhbilby ( talk) 10:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi
you can check below reference for pinnaiyur can you help me on this?
Hi,
i have made few changes on "Gold Flake" article that have been removed, may i know the reason and what should i do and how to approve my content — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smokersforum ( talk • contribs) 10:54, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for all your help on this. Since this is a block evasion, the articles may need protection. If any admins are around. JNW ( talk) 13:51, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for contacting me, and explaining the reason why my edit was removed.
I believe that you have made a mistake. The information that I provided is accurate. This dispute was not public information prior to my edited post, so I am not sure how to site my source (other than the mention of written communications between The Carolina Panthers and myself).
The previously published information is being disputed. By providing the information on this site, I am making the dispute public knowledge.
Can you return my edit to the page, and/or offer suggestions on how I can provide a source for something that is not yet public/published information?
98.94.26.160 ( talk) 15:09, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Hey, I am sorry for deleting something. I am from the Club Basket Swans Gmunden. The Club is not named anymore Allianz Swans Gmunden, it´s just Basket Swans Gmunden. Also the Logo is wrong. We got a sponsor request, to delete all things conecting Allianz with our club. Maybe you can help me to do this?! If you want I can also send you our new Logo.
With best regards!
Richard Poiger — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.112.34.174 ( talk) 14:08, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
This is to inform you that charans are an ancient caste living in india for around two thousand years. So the references are mostly in local languages and in hindi. It is therefore not possible to cite all those references as they are in languages such as Dingal , Hindi, Rajasthani, Marwadi etc none of which is either understood by you or the wikipedia. You are supposed to trust these kind of edits done by locals which foreigners do not understand for obvious reasons. Unless the edit is done by an indian , it must not be trusted , as a foreigner will never be able to understand the local culture. Or unless he or she is an scholer like Janet Campfrost or other historians of certified credibility. Sitush and people like you make edits based on common sense which is not only wrong but also an unethical practice.If you wish to see the references in local languages I can cite the books etc. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.215.184.65 ( talk) 16:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
I am sorry, I misread what was written in the notice. I will not remove it until the amdins agree it is wikified and relevant. Regards -- OKNO ( talk) 13:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. I've taken off the speedy tag for now. I've also restored the translation of fr:GuestToGuest that went missing when you reverted to restore the tag. When a tag removal is coupled with text addition, I usually just re-add it manually. Safer that way... There's quite a few references (which I've not checked yet), and the article in French has been up there for a bit, so AfD might be the best option - if it's thought not notable here. Peridon ( talk) 19:39, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your fantastic job in editing 2602:306:CDEF:6110:8DDA:86C1:8EA:2F96 ( talk) 02:19, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Sometimes I try to edit something from published info., but it won't let me. Can you help me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CDEF:6110:8DDA:86C1:8EA:2F96 ( talk) 02:24, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Sorry to trouble you, but what is your name? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CDEF:6110:8DDA:86C1:8EA:2F96 ( talk) 00:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
You deleted an edit to her page. The edit was to indicate her death; she passed away this morning. There has not been a publicly available death notice, but she is definitely no longer alive. Please do not revert such changes. It is both inaccurate, and offensive.
If you would like a source, cite this. I knew her personally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.195.200.238 ( talk) 11:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm not the user who made the edits to the Beryl Crockford article, however I can confirm she died this morning. I understand the original research policy. I wanted to ask whether you reverted the edits regarding her death because you felt it was necessary to confirm something as sensitive as a death or purely because an unsourced statement was made and policy doesn't allow that?
If the former, it is verifiable online, although only in a Facebook page - not enough for a source but enough for you to be satisfied. https://www.facebook.com/HenleyWomensRegatta/posts/1083927694977219
If the latter, I would point out that it would not be the only unsourced detail in this article, let alone the hundreds of thousands of other biographical articles. Would it be possible to exert some leniency?
Either way, please be mindful that whoever made the post claims to have known Beryl personally and is making the edits on the day of her death. If you feel you need to enforce policy rigidly please try to be sensitive about it; at the moment your manner is (perhaps inadvertently) a bit brusque in the circumstances.
On another point - what if her death is never reported in a primary source? I expect it will be, but perhaps it won't. Does the article continue to refer to her as a living person ad infinitum? I guess there must be other similar cases, is there a policy?
Best regards,
--Mralph72 Chat 12:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
I made those edits to the page for Alcohol Justice because we need to get the word out that they are a neo-Prohibitionist organization. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1002:B12A:3A1E:49D8:7CBD:CC03:526B ( talk) 13:41, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
I intend to edit this article, as in 2011 I had edited and brought it in good shape. However, lateron, it was edited and its present form is not correct.
It talks about climbing the mountain, but again mainly on Malika Parbat North peak. Whilst, Malika Parbat main which is actually known as Malika Parbat speak nothing in the article. I think that you did the right thing, but still I believe that there is a need to rectify the article. I have written a detailed book on this mountain which has been published and present article is totally on contravention. Malika Parbat North was never climbed by the two different parties in the year 2012 however they managed to climb the Fore Summit, which should have been mentioned. Yet the guy namely Imran Junaidi who had edited it is no more who died in a mountaineering accident. So history need to be corrected giving them the credit of what they had actually climbed.
Regards,
Afzel Scherazi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mwppak ( talk • contribs) 14:33, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
My edits were all literally true, from my first hand experience going there. I didn't say anything that was untrue, and i think its important for people to know what TCS lacks in mental health support. How is that Vandalism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.137.66.101 ( talk) 05:02, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi Melbourne Star! Thank you for being interested in the Alan Bern Wikipedia entry! I'm new to this so I may make some mistakes at the beginning. I understand why it's not appropriate to add links as a kind of self-promotion. My intention was to document that something really exists. I appreciate your guidance! Best, Alan Bern, September 14, Alanbern ( talk) 05:56, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi again, MelbourneStar! Is there a way for me to respond to your comments on my own talk page, or do I do that like this (on your talk page)? Alan Bern, September 14, 2016 Alanbern ( talk) 06:07, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
I think I understand now, thanks! So, here's a question. I linked to the Exploratorium Berlin, because it's one of the most important places in Europe for research, teaching and creative work on music improvisation. I also teach occasional workshops there, but my reason for linking to it on Wikipedia is just because I think it really deserves to be known and people might like to follow up the link. Am I thinking about this in the wrong way? Alanbern ( talk) 06:36, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
I am the source as a former member — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:807:8001:66EC:B15E:4AA1:89E9:BFF0 ( talk) 10:11, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
I made an important edit. Ken Buck is the devil himself and that needed to be corrected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.151.127.221 ( talk) 10:43, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello I recently added the citation from original source and edited Vrishali why are you deleting my edits ? Kyo to — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyo to ( talk • contribs) 10:55, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, I know it's not a very encyclopaedic page, but it's definitely not a hoax. They are real - I don't know any personally, but I've seen them, and a quick check on Google is revealing. I get the feeling that a prod would be a waste of time, but an AfD could be interesting... I have copyright doubts about the manga style cartoon illustration, and the others could be copyvios (but it wouldn't be easy proving it). Peridon ( talk) 11:32, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
I hope my comments did not make you think you did something wrong because you didn't. I don't see any reason that the AFD should be blanked. I just saw a different solution that hopefully diffused the situation without blocking or protecting anything. I believe the comment after my last comment was uncalled for. We should try to defuse the situation not make it worse. -- GB fan 13:52, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | → | Archive 30 |
You removed an edit I made on iresq page. There would be no possible way to provide a reliable source. The only source I have is my employment at this facility. No other documentation exist for this subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neotronics ( talk • contribs) 02:52, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
How would I make my previous content a reliable source due to the fact that the previous comment "In February 2009, iResQ announced that it was partnering with a local recycling facility that redistributes surplus electronics to nonprofit organizations. It will also have its cardboard and paper waste processed.[6] " with the provided note [6] was from 2009 and no official record that this action is present at this time to hold note [6] to an absolute fact. The wikipedia only states " that redistributes surplus electronics to nonprofit organizations. It will also have its cardboard and paper waste processed" and nothing providing to my previous content providing only about E-waste. This feels to me to be a conflict. I provided content about E-waste as I am a content creator due to me physically working there to an article from seven years ago that can not be established or proven to the current time frame. I would like to add that from what I have seen on wikipedia many of the content is suggestive to be others opinions. I just wanted to state a fact. So my question would be how to make my content a reliable source? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Neotronics (
talk •
contribs) 04:19, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. Yes my removal of the Orwell reference was a mistake, whilst I was adjusting new references. By restoring the text, however, the additions I made have been removed, and I'm not clear how to easily restore them without repeating the error. Jfhbilby ( talk) 10:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi
you can check below reference for pinnaiyur can you help me on this?
Hi,
i have made few changes on "Gold Flake" article that have been removed, may i know the reason and what should i do and how to approve my content — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smokersforum ( talk • contribs) 10:54, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for all your help on this. Since this is a block evasion, the articles may need protection. If any admins are around. JNW ( talk) 13:51, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for contacting me, and explaining the reason why my edit was removed.
I believe that you have made a mistake. The information that I provided is accurate. This dispute was not public information prior to my edited post, so I am not sure how to site my source (other than the mention of written communications between The Carolina Panthers and myself).
The previously published information is being disputed. By providing the information on this site, I am making the dispute public knowledge.
Can you return my edit to the page, and/or offer suggestions on how I can provide a source for something that is not yet public/published information?
98.94.26.160 ( talk) 15:09, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Hey, I am sorry for deleting something. I am from the Club Basket Swans Gmunden. The Club is not named anymore Allianz Swans Gmunden, it´s just Basket Swans Gmunden. Also the Logo is wrong. We got a sponsor request, to delete all things conecting Allianz with our club. Maybe you can help me to do this?! If you want I can also send you our new Logo.
With best regards!
Richard Poiger — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.112.34.174 ( talk) 14:08, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
This is to inform you that charans are an ancient caste living in india for around two thousand years. So the references are mostly in local languages and in hindi. It is therefore not possible to cite all those references as they are in languages such as Dingal , Hindi, Rajasthani, Marwadi etc none of which is either understood by you or the wikipedia. You are supposed to trust these kind of edits done by locals which foreigners do not understand for obvious reasons. Unless the edit is done by an indian , it must not be trusted , as a foreigner will never be able to understand the local culture. Or unless he or she is an scholer like Janet Campfrost or other historians of certified credibility. Sitush and people like you make edits based on common sense which is not only wrong but also an unethical practice.If you wish to see the references in local languages I can cite the books etc. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.215.184.65 ( talk) 16:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
I am sorry, I misread what was written in the notice. I will not remove it until the amdins agree it is wikified and relevant. Regards -- OKNO ( talk) 13:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. I've taken off the speedy tag for now. I've also restored the translation of fr:GuestToGuest that went missing when you reverted to restore the tag. When a tag removal is coupled with text addition, I usually just re-add it manually. Safer that way... There's quite a few references (which I've not checked yet), and the article in French has been up there for a bit, so AfD might be the best option - if it's thought not notable here. Peridon ( talk) 19:39, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your fantastic job in editing 2602:306:CDEF:6110:8DDA:86C1:8EA:2F96 ( talk) 02:19, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Sometimes I try to edit something from published info., but it won't let me. Can you help me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CDEF:6110:8DDA:86C1:8EA:2F96 ( talk) 02:24, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Sorry to trouble you, but what is your name? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CDEF:6110:8DDA:86C1:8EA:2F96 ( talk) 00:28, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
You deleted an edit to her page. The edit was to indicate her death; she passed away this morning. There has not been a publicly available death notice, but she is definitely no longer alive. Please do not revert such changes. It is both inaccurate, and offensive.
If you would like a source, cite this. I knew her personally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.195.200.238 ( talk) 11:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm not the user who made the edits to the Beryl Crockford article, however I can confirm she died this morning. I understand the original research policy. I wanted to ask whether you reverted the edits regarding her death because you felt it was necessary to confirm something as sensitive as a death or purely because an unsourced statement was made and policy doesn't allow that?
If the former, it is verifiable online, although only in a Facebook page - not enough for a source but enough for you to be satisfied. https://www.facebook.com/HenleyWomensRegatta/posts/1083927694977219
If the latter, I would point out that it would not be the only unsourced detail in this article, let alone the hundreds of thousands of other biographical articles. Would it be possible to exert some leniency?
Either way, please be mindful that whoever made the post claims to have known Beryl personally and is making the edits on the day of her death. If you feel you need to enforce policy rigidly please try to be sensitive about it; at the moment your manner is (perhaps inadvertently) a bit brusque in the circumstances.
On another point - what if her death is never reported in a primary source? I expect it will be, but perhaps it won't. Does the article continue to refer to her as a living person ad infinitum? I guess there must be other similar cases, is there a policy?
Best regards,
--Mralph72 Chat 12:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
I made those edits to the page for Alcohol Justice because we need to get the word out that they are a neo-Prohibitionist organization. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1002:B12A:3A1E:49D8:7CBD:CC03:526B ( talk) 13:41, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
I intend to edit this article, as in 2011 I had edited and brought it in good shape. However, lateron, it was edited and its present form is not correct.
It talks about climbing the mountain, but again mainly on Malika Parbat North peak. Whilst, Malika Parbat main which is actually known as Malika Parbat speak nothing in the article. I think that you did the right thing, but still I believe that there is a need to rectify the article. I have written a detailed book on this mountain which has been published and present article is totally on contravention. Malika Parbat North was never climbed by the two different parties in the year 2012 however they managed to climb the Fore Summit, which should have been mentioned. Yet the guy namely Imran Junaidi who had edited it is no more who died in a mountaineering accident. So history need to be corrected giving them the credit of what they had actually climbed.
Regards,
Afzel Scherazi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mwppak ( talk • contribs) 14:33, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
My edits were all literally true, from my first hand experience going there. I didn't say anything that was untrue, and i think its important for people to know what TCS lacks in mental health support. How is that Vandalism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.137.66.101 ( talk) 05:02, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi Melbourne Star! Thank you for being interested in the Alan Bern Wikipedia entry! I'm new to this so I may make some mistakes at the beginning. I understand why it's not appropriate to add links as a kind of self-promotion. My intention was to document that something really exists. I appreciate your guidance! Best, Alan Bern, September 14, Alanbern ( talk) 05:56, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi again, MelbourneStar! Is there a way for me to respond to your comments on my own talk page, or do I do that like this (on your talk page)? Alan Bern, September 14, 2016 Alanbern ( talk) 06:07, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
I think I understand now, thanks! So, here's a question. I linked to the Exploratorium Berlin, because it's one of the most important places in Europe for research, teaching and creative work on music improvisation. I also teach occasional workshops there, but my reason for linking to it on Wikipedia is just because I think it really deserves to be known and people might like to follow up the link. Am I thinking about this in the wrong way? Alanbern ( talk) 06:36, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
I am the source as a former member — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:807:8001:66EC:B15E:4AA1:89E9:BFF0 ( talk) 10:11, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
I made an important edit. Ken Buck is the devil himself and that needed to be corrected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.151.127.221 ( talk) 10:43, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello I recently added the citation from original source and edited Vrishali why are you deleting my edits ? Kyo to — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyo to ( talk • contribs) 10:55, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, I know it's not a very encyclopaedic page, but it's definitely not a hoax. They are real - I don't know any personally, but I've seen them, and a quick check on Google is revealing. I get the feeling that a prod would be a waste of time, but an AfD could be interesting... I have copyright doubts about the manga style cartoon illustration, and the others could be copyvios (but it wouldn't be easy proving it). Peridon ( talk) 11:32, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
I hope my comments did not make you think you did something wrong because you didn't. I don't see any reason that the AFD should be blanked. I just saw a different solution that hopefully diffused the situation without blocking or protecting anything. I believe the comment after my last comment was uncalled for. We should try to defuse the situation not make it worse. -- GB fan 13:52, 14 September 2016 (UTC)