I have only recently joined Wikipedia. While searching for topics that I consider myself an expert on to watch, I realized that the unbirth and unbirthing pages had been deleted. Yours was the signature under the deletion notice. I would like to discuss bringing back the page so that I may maintain it. I am sorry if I did not need your permission to do this, but I have been told by the help pages that it is a common courtesy to discuss things such as this. I believe unbirthing should redirect to unbirth as the first step. Thank you for your time, I look forward to giving wikipedia a respectable unbirth page. Master of Waterfowl ( talk) 23:00, 1 Jan 2013 (UTC) Sorry I can't do this signature correctly and my user page says that it doesn't exist. Please just go to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Master_of_Waterfowl sorry about this.
For reference, can you say which of the WP:BAND criteria it was decided that SBA fulfil for notability and which they do not? There seem to be several article on relatively minor bands out there and I'm interested in where the bar's been set. Paul S ( talk) 15:06, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi there. I spotted an AFD that has been relisted twice (and this would be the third time) without any comments apart from the nominator. Should it be closed as no consensus (and can a non-admin do that?). Steven Zhang Help resolve disputes! 07:40, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your message on my talk page. I have replied there. JamesBWatson ( talk) 12:07, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Project sponsored and managed by Avesthagen Limited to help with cancer research by taking genetic samples of an inbred community called the Parsis and using their genetic to isolate certain markers.
This article should not be deleted as it is not an advertisement, but information regarding cutting edge research in the field of population genetics and should, therefore, be promoted.
There is enough articles and scientific papers out there.
The original article was a stub. Currently I am in communication with the company and have requested them to release more details regarding this project. -- Deathtap ( talk) 17:31, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
I believe this close was incorrect as there is no consensus that Ambassadors are inherantly notable and in the absence of reliable secondary sources the policy for a BLP is that we should delete. Bu giving weight to the inherantly notable crowd you were not giving due weight to the views that reflect the actual policy. I realise this is arguably an obtruse point. Do you have any objection to my raising a DRV to seek clarification? Spartaz Humbug! 16:46, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you added a block notice to the user talk page of FalconAzeri, but something seems to have gone wrong somewhere, because according to the block log the user account hasn't been blocked. Thomas.W ( talk) 14:21, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
✉→ Arctic Kangaroo ←✎ 01:03, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Since you mentioned the oppose rationale, i thought you'd be interested in reading my oppose in WP:Requests for adminship/Adjwilley. Pass a Method talk 01:48, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
I have only recently joined Wikipedia. While searching for topics that I consider myself an expert on to watch, I realized that the unbirth and unbirthing pages had been deleted. Yours was the signature under the deletion notice. I would like to discuss bringing back the page so that I may maintain it. I am sorry if I did not need your permission to do this, but I have been told by the help pages that it is a common courtesy to discuss things such as this. I believe unbirthing should redirect to unbirth as the first step. Thank you for your time, I look forward to giving wikipedia a respectable unbirth page. Master of Waterfowl ( talk) 23:00, 1 Jan 2013 (UTC) Sorry I can't do this signature correctly and my user page says that it doesn't exist. Please just go to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Master_of_Waterfowl sorry about this.
For reference, can you say which of the WP:BAND criteria it was decided that SBA fulfil for notability and which they do not? There seem to be several article on relatively minor bands out there and I'm interested in where the bar's been set. Paul S ( talk) 15:06, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi there. I spotted an AFD that has been relisted twice (and this would be the third time) without any comments apart from the nominator. Should it be closed as no consensus (and can a non-admin do that?). Steven Zhang Help resolve disputes! 07:40, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your message on my talk page. I have replied there. JamesBWatson ( talk) 12:07, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Project sponsored and managed by Avesthagen Limited to help with cancer research by taking genetic samples of an inbred community called the Parsis and using their genetic to isolate certain markers.
This article should not be deleted as it is not an advertisement, but information regarding cutting edge research in the field of population genetics and should, therefore, be promoted.
There is enough articles and scientific papers out there.
The original article was a stub. Currently I am in communication with the company and have requested them to release more details regarding this project. -- Deathtap ( talk) 17:31, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
I believe this close was incorrect as there is no consensus that Ambassadors are inherantly notable and in the absence of reliable secondary sources the policy for a BLP is that we should delete. Bu giving weight to the inherantly notable crowd you were not giving due weight to the views that reflect the actual policy. I realise this is arguably an obtruse point. Do you have any objection to my raising a DRV to seek clarification? Spartaz Humbug! 16:46, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you added a block notice to the user talk page of FalconAzeri, but something seems to have gone wrong somewhere, because according to the block log the user account hasn't been blocked. Thomas.W ( talk) 14:21, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
✉→ Arctic Kangaroo ←✎ 01:03, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Since you mentioned the oppose rationale, i thought you'd be interested in reading my oppose in WP:Requests for adminship/Adjwilley. Pass a Method talk 01:48, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)