This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Ktlynch (
talk) has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the
WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!
It came up on my watchlist last night as Koavf was doing some cat. housekeeping. When I saw it, I almost laughed, 'cause it's an absurd claim. My guess is that the category will probably need a close examination and pruning. I am going to add the category to my watchlist, for what little good it will do. Likewise, would you mind adding Category:Surrealist films to your watchlist? I recently edited that cat., as numerous inappropriate films had been added. The problem, of course, is that having a category on your watchlist does very little good, since articles that are added to the category do not show up on the history. I wish there was some way to change that. We must remain, as the man said, "Ever vigilant!" --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive' 16:42, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
If or when you have a moment, would you mind taking a looking at the recent messages left on my talk page, and my response to the first (I did not regard the 2nd as worthy of a response), and tell me if you think the other user is in the right? I feel I made an appropriate response, but his attitude has not changed. Thanks, as always, for your time. --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive' 03:22, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Would like your input on his birthplace ....
According to http://www.ci.carroll.oh.us/LonChaney.html Lon Chaney was born on a farm two miles west of Carroll, Ohio at the corner of Winchester and Lockville Road on April 1, 1883. The family moved to California soon after his birth. Unibond ( talk) 02:42, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
I started a discussion about the IP address's edit here, if you'd like to contribute. — Torchiest talk edits 16:13, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
You know who on you know what article. (I was just about to put the message on his talk page.) —Prhartcom (talk) 17:54, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Would you kindly give your opinion, either way, at the
Off Broadway article talk page, either way? I am looking for a consensus to move the article. My feeling is that the two four links sources cited give a good enough basis for making the move. All the best! --
Ssilvers (
talk) 23:41, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
The January 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 03:15, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi - cleaned crap & added this and that to OW bibliography article yesterday but notice its undone wholesale now, i think it was more or less ok was it not, but i hadnt logged in (sorry) if you log in they less often undo you have noticed that much. Well I'm a big admirer & happen to know bit of OW so thought spruce things little bit up as them OW articles do not seem too high quality, i think i know what i'm doing tho they quarel with me on Arthur Seville article you can see but i was right right right. Will take the liberty to undo your undos if that's a problem box my ears i'm not too serious wiki contributor & ignorant of conventions. Then btw do you think it's ok to merge Decay of Lying & Critic as Artist into a single Intentions article like it is for stories & fairy tales a single article for a collection not for each story (only exception Canterville Ghost), then i could add a word about Pen Pencil Poison & Truth of Masks which definetly do not deserve seperate articles. (Created Critic as Artist stub myself last week & Decay of Lying is not much better) Karlis44 ( talk) 13:05, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
gee i woudnt qurel. what do spelling errors here can possibly matter or signify lol. please point out a change ive made to the article in question that you object to is all. "To the aesthetic temperament the vague is always repellent. we desire the concrete, and nothing but the concrete can satisfy us." http://www.wilde-online.info/the-critic-as-artist-page29.html Lets have a chat. Or kick me off your wikipedia. English is my third language ok but i believe i have a better command of it now than your avarage native speaker Karlis44 ( talk) 18:18, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Would you like to participate? It's been going on for a few days; thought you might be interested if you ignore how trivial-sounding this contentious issue is. Before you do, ask yourself this question: Do you like the Beatles? Are you a Beatles fan? Or do you like The Beatles? Are you a The Beatles fan? Cheers. —Prhartcom (talk) 16:41, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Ktlynch (
talk) has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the
WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!
It came up on my watchlist last night as Koavf was doing some cat. housekeeping. When I saw it, I almost laughed, 'cause it's an absurd claim. My guess is that the category will probably need a close examination and pruning. I am going to add the category to my watchlist, for what little good it will do. Likewise, would you mind adding Category:Surrealist films to your watchlist? I recently edited that cat., as numerous inappropriate films had been added. The problem, of course, is that having a category on your watchlist does very little good, since articles that are added to the category do not show up on the history. I wish there was some way to change that. We must remain, as the man said, "Ever vigilant!" --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive' 16:42, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
If or when you have a moment, would you mind taking a looking at the recent messages left on my talk page, and my response to the first (I did not regard the 2nd as worthy of a response), and tell me if you think the other user is in the right? I feel I made an appropriate response, but his attitude has not changed. Thanks, as always, for your time. --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive' 03:22, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Would like your input on his birthplace ....
According to http://www.ci.carroll.oh.us/LonChaney.html Lon Chaney was born on a farm two miles west of Carroll, Ohio at the corner of Winchester and Lockville Road on April 1, 1883. The family moved to California soon after his birth. Unibond ( talk) 02:42, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
I started a discussion about the IP address's edit here, if you'd like to contribute. — Torchiest talk edits 16:13, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
You know who on you know what article. (I was just about to put the message on his talk page.) —Prhartcom (talk) 17:54, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Would you kindly give your opinion, either way, at the
Off Broadway article talk page, either way? I am looking for a consensus to move the article. My feeling is that the two four links sources cited give a good enough basis for making the move. All the best! --
Ssilvers (
talk) 23:41, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
The January 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 03:15, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi - cleaned crap & added this and that to OW bibliography article yesterday but notice its undone wholesale now, i think it was more or less ok was it not, but i hadnt logged in (sorry) if you log in they less often undo you have noticed that much. Well I'm a big admirer & happen to know bit of OW so thought spruce things little bit up as them OW articles do not seem too high quality, i think i know what i'm doing tho they quarel with me on Arthur Seville article you can see but i was right right right. Will take the liberty to undo your undos if that's a problem box my ears i'm not too serious wiki contributor & ignorant of conventions. Then btw do you think it's ok to merge Decay of Lying & Critic as Artist into a single Intentions article like it is for stories & fairy tales a single article for a collection not for each story (only exception Canterville Ghost), then i could add a word about Pen Pencil Poison & Truth of Masks which definetly do not deserve seperate articles. (Created Critic as Artist stub myself last week & Decay of Lying is not much better) Karlis44 ( talk) 13:05, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
gee i woudnt qurel. what do spelling errors here can possibly matter or signify lol. please point out a change ive made to the article in question that you object to is all. "To the aesthetic temperament the vague is always repellent. we desire the concrete, and nothing but the concrete can satisfy us." http://www.wilde-online.info/the-critic-as-artist-page29.html Lets have a chat. Or kick me off your wikipedia. English is my third language ok but i believe i have a better command of it now than your avarage native speaker Karlis44 ( talk) 18:18, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Would you like to participate? It's been going on for a few days; thought you might be interested if you ignore how trivial-sounding this contentious issue is. Before you do, ask yourself this question: Do you like the Beatles? Are you a Beatles fan? Or do you like The Beatles? Are you a The Beatles fan? Cheers. —Prhartcom (talk) 16:41, 2 February 2011 (UTC)