This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi there! Why did you delete Wikipedia:Requests for checkusership/Majorly? I mean, why didn't you keep it as an archive, for history? Cheers, 213.207.252.184 ( talk) 18:01, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the namecheck at RfB. If my absence from CHU (which, incidentally, hasn't been backlogged since I became a 'crat) was such an issue for you to bring it up at RfB, I would have preferred you to have brought it up with me personally rather than use another editor's RfB to do it. As it happens, a number of unexpected and unpleasant issues both on and off wiki have curtailed my editing. The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
I've restored the introduction that matches the article's current (protected) title. Since that title considerably narrows the content of the page, I have also deleted works that do not now fit under this title, which has been vigorously protected by those who restored it. I have no quarrel with restoring a list to that page, but the list must match the title. I had worked on a very different solution to that page's problems, but the solution we had arrived at was aggressively attacked and obliterated recently. I am confining myself at this point simply to insuring that whatever the title is will match the contents of the list. Thanks for your work! I'm not in opposition to it. SocJan ( talk) 21:09, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
With respect to my question here, I did not intend to be insulting about it. I don't particularly have issue with you being an administrator. I wanted to know Avi's opinions on what is and what is not permissible under the ArbCom ruling, as well as how reconfirmation RfAs affect this. I think that your case exemplified the lack of cohesion in what the community believes. Since bureaucrats are, for better or for worse, the ultimate deciders in issues RfA, I would like to know how a potential bureaucrat might act in that situation. At any rate, it isn't clearly about you, since the two candidates that have been asked about it thought of ^demon. Who knew? seresin ( ¡? ) 04:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Just for your information, here's a quick check on the "active" 'crats actions since 1 April, 2008:
The other three (Kingturtle, WJBScribe, WarofDreams) are obviously not included since they're very prominent in their respective areas of expertise. So that makes me the fourth most active Bureaucrat in English Wikipedia since beginning of April. I'll leave it here, I just wish you'd checked how our "experienced, active" 'crats are doing before identifying me as an "inactive" 'crat. The Rambling Man ( talk) 16:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Out of curiosity, is your other account still active, and if not, do you plan to request admin rights for this one? dihydrogen monoxide ( H2O) 08:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Death of John Lennon. Done. -- andreasegde ( talk) 14:04, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Al tally, I know how important the RFA process is and its instances like what happened to Archtransit that i guess makes us all wonder that anybody can do anything. I know with Will nominating him for RFA must have made him pretty angry about the stuff he did and all the other 53 supporters, i guess he tricked the whole community. I dont know anything about the user but i guess we can all learn from it, how i dont know. It just i guess makes you wonder, of course it didn't take long for him to be banned but it puts a thought in your mind, that something bad although thankfully rare can happen. Thanks, just wanted your thoughts. Roadrunnerz45 ( talk 2 me) 13:58, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey there! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 48, Wikipedia Weekly's third talk with Jimmy Wales, is now available. Listen or download MP3 and OGG versions at the episode's page.
For the Wikipedia Weekly team, WODUPbot 23:41, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
You're receiving this because you're listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 18 | 2 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 19 | 9 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 06:05, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
How are the last minute train prices looking?! Wikipedia:Meetup/London 9. Would be good to see you, otherwise maybe we'll try to focus everyone on a BIG event at some point -- Harry Wood ( talk) 15:39, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey Majorly, if you're available could you swoop over to Simple English and block a really persistent vandal? I think I must have reverted him at least 10 times now! Thanks, EJF ( talk) 11:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your piece of advice. Will keep in Mind. I was giving it to ONLY interesting people I found and liked on Wikipedia. -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 11:35, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Over at Wikipedia talk:Requests for bureaucratship/Avraham 2. Hope this helps. Rudget ( Help?) 14:48, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Al.
I wanted to personally thank you for taking part in the project-wide discussions regarding my candidacy for bureaucratship. After bureaucratic discussion, the bureaucrats decided that there was sufficient significant and varied opposition to my candidacy, and thus no consensus to promote. Although personally disappointed, I both understand and respect their decision, especially in light of historical conservatism the project has had when selecting its bureaucrats. I wanted to especially thank you for the support you gave me during the process. If you have any further suggestions or comments as to how you think I could help the project, please let me know. Once again, thank you for your support. -- Avi ( talk) 18:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Why can't I add myself? Kingjeff ( talk) 21:48, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 20 | 12 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 09:06, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Majorly, I completely agree with you about the aggravation that KMW has so eloquently provided to Wikipedia. He ironically has completely nullified all of his opinions because of the perposterous way he presents himself. He shouldn't be banned though. I very strongly dislike KMW for reasons I won't even link because I'm embarrassed of my responses (he hit a nerve I didn't even know I had on-wiki). Let him oppose self noms. And ADCO noms. Usually, it backfires in his face though, and what he'd like to see rejected ends up accepted simply because he advocates for rejection (how many "per kurt" supports have you seen? I've seen several). Sigh. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:18, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
I noticed List of Solar System planets on your user page. Table of planets and dwarf planets in the Solar System already exists, and the material in Planet is also good (it is a featured article). Just wanted to make sure you knew that before creating a redundant list. The stuff at Planet#Solar System is pretty much a list already. Carcharoth ( talk) 22:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Good news! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 49 is now available. Listen or download MP3 and OGG versions at the episode's page.
For the Wikipedia Weekly team, WODUPbot 23:00, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
You're receiving this because you're listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi there! Why did you delete Wikipedia:Requests for checkusership/Majorly? I mean, why didn't you keep it as an archive, for history? Cheers, 213.207.252.184 ( talk) 18:01, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the namecheck at RfB. If my absence from CHU (which, incidentally, hasn't been backlogged since I became a 'crat) was such an issue for you to bring it up at RfB, I would have preferred you to have brought it up with me personally rather than use another editor's RfB to do it. As it happens, a number of unexpected and unpleasant issues both on and off wiki have curtailed my editing. The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
I've restored the introduction that matches the article's current (protected) title. Since that title considerably narrows the content of the page, I have also deleted works that do not now fit under this title, which has been vigorously protected by those who restored it. I have no quarrel with restoring a list to that page, but the list must match the title. I had worked on a very different solution to that page's problems, but the solution we had arrived at was aggressively attacked and obliterated recently. I am confining myself at this point simply to insuring that whatever the title is will match the contents of the list. Thanks for your work! I'm not in opposition to it. SocJan ( talk) 21:09, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
With respect to my question here, I did not intend to be insulting about it. I don't particularly have issue with you being an administrator. I wanted to know Avi's opinions on what is and what is not permissible under the ArbCom ruling, as well as how reconfirmation RfAs affect this. I think that your case exemplified the lack of cohesion in what the community believes. Since bureaucrats are, for better or for worse, the ultimate deciders in issues RfA, I would like to know how a potential bureaucrat might act in that situation. At any rate, it isn't clearly about you, since the two candidates that have been asked about it thought of ^demon. Who knew? seresin ( ¡? ) 04:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Just for your information, here's a quick check on the "active" 'crats actions since 1 April, 2008:
The other three (Kingturtle, WJBScribe, WarofDreams) are obviously not included since they're very prominent in their respective areas of expertise. So that makes me the fourth most active Bureaucrat in English Wikipedia since beginning of April. I'll leave it here, I just wish you'd checked how our "experienced, active" 'crats are doing before identifying me as an "inactive" 'crat. The Rambling Man ( talk) 16:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Out of curiosity, is your other account still active, and if not, do you plan to request admin rights for this one? dihydrogen monoxide ( H2O) 08:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Death of John Lennon. Done. -- andreasegde ( talk) 14:04, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Al tally, I know how important the RFA process is and its instances like what happened to Archtransit that i guess makes us all wonder that anybody can do anything. I know with Will nominating him for RFA must have made him pretty angry about the stuff he did and all the other 53 supporters, i guess he tricked the whole community. I dont know anything about the user but i guess we can all learn from it, how i dont know. It just i guess makes you wonder, of course it didn't take long for him to be banned but it puts a thought in your mind, that something bad although thankfully rare can happen. Thanks, just wanted your thoughts. Roadrunnerz45 ( talk 2 me) 13:58, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey there! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 48, Wikipedia Weekly's third talk with Jimmy Wales, is now available. Listen or download MP3 and OGG versions at the episode's page.
For the Wikipedia Weekly team, WODUPbot 23:41, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
You're receiving this because you're listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 18 | 2 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 19 | 9 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 06:05, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
How are the last minute train prices looking?! Wikipedia:Meetup/London 9. Would be good to see you, otherwise maybe we'll try to focus everyone on a BIG event at some point -- Harry Wood ( talk) 15:39, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey Majorly, if you're available could you swoop over to Simple English and block a really persistent vandal? I think I must have reverted him at least 10 times now! Thanks, EJF ( talk) 11:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your piece of advice. Will keep in Mind. I was giving it to ONLY interesting people I found and liked on Wikipedia. -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 11:35, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Over at Wikipedia talk:Requests for bureaucratship/Avraham 2. Hope this helps. Rudget ( Help?) 14:48, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Al.
I wanted to personally thank you for taking part in the project-wide discussions regarding my candidacy for bureaucratship. After bureaucratic discussion, the bureaucrats decided that there was sufficient significant and varied opposition to my candidacy, and thus no consensus to promote. Although personally disappointed, I both understand and respect their decision, especially in light of historical conservatism the project has had when selecting its bureaucrats. I wanted to especially thank you for the support you gave me during the process. If you have any further suggestions or comments as to how you think I could help the project, please let me know. Once again, thank you for your support. -- Avi ( talk) 18:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Why can't I add myself? Kingjeff ( talk) 21:48, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 20 | 12 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 09:06, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Majorly, I completely agree with you about the aggravation that KMW has so eloquently provided to Wikipedia. He ironically has completely nullified all of his opinions because of the perposterous way he presents himself. He shouldn't be banned though. I very strongly dislike KMW for reasons I won't even link because I'm embarrassed of my responses (he hit a nerve I didn't even know I had on-wiki). Let him oppose self noms. And ADCO noms. Usually, it backfires in his face though, and what he'd like to see rejected ends up accepted simply because he advocates for rejection (how many "per kurt" supports have you seen? I've seen several). Sigh. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:18, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
I noticed List of Solar System planets on your user page. Table of planets and dwarf planets in the Solar System already exists, and the material in Planet is also good (it is a featured article). Just wanted to make sure you knew that before creating a redundant list. The stuff at Planet#Solar System is pretty much a list already. Carcharoth ( talk) 22:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Good news! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 49 is now available. Listen or download MP3 and OGG versions at the episode's page.
For the Wikipedia Weekly team, WODUPbot 23:00, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
You're receiving this because you're listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.