Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mori Calliope fan was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This may possibly become notable, but it will require reliable sources, not just a reference to Twitter.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Genuine (Album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Genuine (Album), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mori Calliope fan talk 16:35, 12 July 2022 (UTC) reply

thank you for the notice :) matt. ( talk) 15:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Magmamatt! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mori Calliope fan talk 16:35, 12 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Magmamatt, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Chris troutman, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Loonatheworld, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loonatheworld.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chris Troutman ( talk) 12:45, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

@ Chris troutman: okay, does this mean loonaverse:from will also be discussed for deletion? also i believe that loonatheworld tour should not be deleted considering that it is a major tour across the usa, and that will only expand as the tour goes on. just my opinion matt. ( talk) 12:54, 15 July 2022 (UTC) matt. ( talk) 12:54, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

As stated above, you can voice your opinion at the deletion discussion. Wikipedia does not have a notability rule to protect major tours across the USA. We need multiple, in-depth, reliable sources on any topic for a standalone article. Please read what I have already told you, instead of sinking into your own preference on the matter. We cannot have a conversation if you refuse to listen. Chris Troutman ( talk) 15:14, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

@ Chris troutman:

just realized i misread this and i know understand what you meant. sorry if i came off as rude matt. ( talk) 05:37, 16 July 2022 (UTC) reply

so will loonaverse from also be deleted matt. ( talk) 15:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loonatheworld, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loonatheworld until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 16 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:LOONA 1st World Tour, (LOONATHEWORLD) Promotional poster (1st edition)).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Minorax^{«¦ talk¦»} 07:12, 16 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Magmamatt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Genuine (Sunye album), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 10:01, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of WP:NALBUM - Twitter and YouTube are not acceptable or reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Genuine (Sunye album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt ( talk) 06:32, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Lightoil. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chuu (singer), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Allkpop is not a reliable source per WP:KO/RS#UR Lightoil ( talk) 03:47, 7 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Magmamatt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Genuine".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 12 September 2023 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on 1916-17 Springfield Streetcar Strike requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://greenecountymo.gov/files/files.php?id=85. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tartar Torte 02:34, 22 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Do i need to update the copyright information? The file in the text is old enough to be public domain as it is from 1917, well before the 1928 cutoff. matt. ( talk) 02:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Magmamatt, the article that I'm having it matching has a publishing date in 2004, unless I'm mistaken related to something. I would like to be mistaken though, because I do really like the article and it's a fascinating topic. Tartar Torte 03:07, 22 October 2023 (UTC) reply

I do greatly appreciate your interest in the topic. :)

After further research I have removed the images from all articles, I was unable to find any clear copyright information between of any of the three parties (Author of the article, The Greene county archive, and the History Museum of Springfield(Who the author claims provided the images.))

On that note, I do have access to many images provided to an author of a book talking about the history of the Ozarks and Springfield. This book has multiple photos that, to my knowledge, do not exist online. The photos were provided from a number of sources, including the Springfield Art Museum, History Museum of Springfield, as well as many personal photographs. If I find out if these photos could be used I would more then happy to find a high quality way to digitize these images.

The book in question is Springfield of the Ozarks: An Illustrated History - Harris & Phyllis Dark

Published in 1981 - ISBN: 0-89781-028-7 matt. ( talk) 04:10, 22 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Green Line (St. Louis MetroLink), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin ( talk) 02:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:One of a Kind – Loossemble.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks, it appears someone beat me to uploading the file. Thank you for the notice! matt. ( talk) 15:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Magmamatt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Genuine".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:19, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply