Hello, Leojuan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for
your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
{{helpme}} on your
talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking
 or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "
adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a
WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click
here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!
Peaceray (
talk) 14:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC) |
|---|
- Thanks for the warm welcome. I really appreciate it. I'm definitely excited and would definitely join WikiProject once I'm confident with the guidelines. Cheers! Leojuan ( talk) 14:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Peaceray ( talk) 14:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Douglas Cumming
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Douglas Cumming, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A " missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. ( Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 16:00, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, I've just double checked the references. They look fine to me. The names of the journals and websites are already there in the citations. Or am I missing on something again? I appreciate your concern. Thank you! ~~~~ Leojuan ( talk) 13:59, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello. In a recent edit to the page
Singapore Girl, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to
respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. "Traveller" and "travelled" are correct spellings in Singapore. Julietdeltalima (talk) 12:58, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hello.
- Noted, thanks @ Julietdeltalima! I'll be more careful the next time something of the same nature appears on my screen for editing. I appreciate your guidance in this matter. Leojuan ( talk) 13:06, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Please be sure to only use reliable sources as reference. Using an WP:IMDBREF as you did in your recent edit to Tom Malloy is not ok. Toddst1 ( talk) 23:31, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for educating me on this matter. I'll make sure to be precise about this while making contributions in future. Leojuan ( talk) 12:40, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our
guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of
your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:
- Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
- State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
- Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
Leojuan ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I figured I made some edits and used some adjectives which may have brought me to this point. I'll make sure to avoid that next time I do the edits. Would really apprecaite this block lift! Leojuan ( talk) 06:30, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The issue is not that you used certain adjectives, that was just the symptom. Please specifically speak to the reason for the block as the block notice instructs. I am declining your request. 331dot ( talk) 09:45, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, Leojuan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for
your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
{{helpme}} on your
talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking
or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "
adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a
WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click
here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!
Peaceray (
talk) 14:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC) |
|---|
- Thanks for the warm welcome. I really appreciate it. I'm definitely excited and would definitely join WikiProject once I'm confident with the guidelines. Cheers! Leojuan ( talk) 14:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Peaceray ( talk) 14:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Douglas Cumming
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Douglas Cumming, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A " missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. ( Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 16:00, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, I've just double checked the references. They look fine to me. The names of the journals and websites are already there in the citations. Or am I missing on something again? I appreciate your concern. Thank you! ~~~~ Leojuan ( talk) 13:59, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello. In a recent edit to the page
Singapore Girl, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to
respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. "Traveller" and "travelled" are correct spellings in Singapore. Julietdeltalima (talk) 12:58, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hello.
- Noted, thanks @ Julietdeltalima! I'll be more careful the next time something of the same nature appears on my screen for editing. I appreciate your guidance in this matter. Leojuan ( talk) 13:06, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Please be sure to only use reliable sources as reference. Using an WP:IMDBREF as you did in your recent edit to Tom Malloy is not ok. Toddst1 ( talk) 23:31, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for educating me on this matter. I'll make sure to be precise about this while making contributions in future. Leojuan ( talk) 12:40, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our
guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of
your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:
- Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
- State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
- Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
Leojuan ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I figured I made some edits and used some adjectives which may have brought me to this point. I'll make sure to avoid that next time I do the edits. Would really apprecaite this block lift! Leojuan ( talk) 06:30, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The issue is not that you used certain adjectives, that was just the symptom. Please specifically speak to the reason for the block as the block notice instructs. I am declining your request. 331dot ( talk) 09:45, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.