Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Here are a few links you might find helpful:
- Be Bold!
- Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
- Meet other new users
- Learn from others
- Play nicely with others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us about you
You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on
my talk page. Or, please come to the
New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
We're so glad you're here! Doktor Who 16:48, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Your addition was mostly just fine; I tightened the language just a bit and formatted the reference, and dropped it back a paragraph to put The Final Cut at the heading of its own paragraph. - dharmabum 20:48, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you. I liked your reworking of the paragraph -- it's the kind of thing that requires a seasoned editor. This article is getting better all the time ^-^ -
leifbk 21:46, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- I agree; of the 0.01% of the articles on Wikipedia considered good enough for featured status, I think it's in a handful of the very best (partially because it went through candidacy fairly recently, and standards have become a lot more strict than they were a couple years ago). - dharmabum 22:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi! You might be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Science.-- ragesoss 21:03, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Let's discuss this on the talk page rather than defiling Wikipedia with vitriol. I am also hereby giving you fair warning under the Three Revert Rule. Wogsland 22:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Looks interesting I will try and install it. Gioto ( talk) 11:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi I was wondering if you could help save this article from deletion. Its currently up for afd. I;m certain something in Norwegian can be translated to expand it. I think it is notable but google is lacking. Could you consider seeing ( this and This ) and try to expand it. Brynjar Å is also another form of the name. Could you help mate? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 13:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- I don't know. I was vaguely aware of the name, but there's very little about him on the 'net, and the Norwegian Wiki article is even shorter than the English one. The guy seems to deliberately stay away from media. As I neither have read his books nor have planned to, and don't feel like a literary critic anyway, I can hardly contrive a Wikipedia article about him out of thin air. But he seems like a sympathic fellow. leifbk ( talk) 14:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (
consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot ( talk) 20:20, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, just thought I'd let you know I reworked Hallvard Graatop a little, to try to separate Graatop and Vraalstad a bit more clearly, and make it look more like an article and less like an argument. I recently found (seemingly sound, but still investigating) that I'm a descendant of the Vralstad and Paus families, so it's a subject I've been trying to read up on. -- Jake ( talk) 18:48, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you, this looks like an interesting approach for a new start at the article. I hope that Wogsland won't resist changes this time.
 | Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Here are a few links you might find helpful:
- Be Bold!
- Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
- Meet other new users
- Learn from others
- Play nicely with others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us about you
You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on
my talk page. Or, please come to the
New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
We're so glad you're here! Doktor Who 16:48, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Your addition was mostly just fine; I tightened the language just a bit and formatted the reference, and dropped it back a paragraph to put The Final Cut at the heading of its own paragraph. - dharmabum 20:48, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you. I liked your reworking of the paragraph -- it's the kind of thing that requires a seasoned editor. This article is getting better all the time ^-^ -
leifbk 21:46, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- I agree; of the 0.01% of the articles on Wikipedia considered good enough for featured status, I think it's in a handful of the very best (partially because it went through candidacy fairly recently, and standards have become a lot more strict than they were a couple years ago). - dharmabum 22:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi! You might be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Science.-- ragesoss 21:03, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Let's discuss this on the talk page rather than defiling Wikipedia with vitriol. I am also hereby giving you fair warning under the Three Revert Rule. Wogsland 22:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Looks interesting I will try and install it. Gioto ( talk) 11:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi I was wondering if you could help save this article from deletion. Its currently up for afd. I;m certain something in Norwegian can be translated to expand it. I think it is notable but google is lacking. Could you consider seeing ( this and This ) and try to expand it. Brynjar Å is also another form of the name. Could you help mate? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 13:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- I don't know. I was vaguely aware of the name, but there's very little about him on the 'net, and the Norwegian Wiki article is even shorter than the English one. The guy seems to deliberately stay away from media. As I neither have read his books nor have planned to, and don't feel like a literary critic anyway, I can hardly contrive a Wikipedia article about him out of thin air. But he seems like a sympathic fellow. leifbk ( talk) 14:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (
consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot ( talk) 20:20, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, just thought I'd let you know I reworked Hallvard Graatop a little, to try to separate Graatop and Vraalstad a bit more clearly, and make it look more like an article and less like an argument. I recently found (seemingly sound, but still investigating) that I'm a descendant of the Vralstad and Paus families, so it's a subject I've been trying to read up on. -- Jake ( talk) 18:48, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you, this looks like an interesting approach for a new start at the article. I hope that Wogsland won't resist changes this time.
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |