|
The Teamwork Barnstar |
| Thank you for keeping Bitcoin in shape. you are an awesome wikipedian ! Wuerzele ( talk) 20:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC) |
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| Ladislav, thanks much for improving and maintaining legality of bitcoin working with Fleetham, so it has become useful and reliable ! Wuerzele ( talk) 15 October 2015 (UTC) |
|
Thanks for fixing my style errors in History of Bitcoin I'll try to remember to use lowercase in the future :) Mbevand ( talk) 19:23, 2 January 2017 (UTC) |
- No, problem, Mbevand, you are welcome. This is a matter of convention, and it looks that the competent sources (and WP editors) started to prefer uniform lowercase as described at Bitcoin#Etymology and orthography. Ladislav Mecir ( talk) 20:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:46, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For being a fair and rational editor. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf ( talk) 18:23, 9 July 2018 (UTC) |
|
Thanks for tirelessly maintaining bitcoin-related topics. You were recently mentioned in a 🌶 podcast (episode here). Peace & respect. 84percent ( talk) 10:33, 9 April 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
The Teamwork Barnstar |
| Thank you for asking the right questions that allow me to think more on how to write better contributions to Wikipedia. JeffreyDutch ( talk) 13:01, 16 April 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
The Teamwork Barnstar |
| Appreciate your input to edit for clarity of topic. Always good when reviewers provide advice. Kmccook ( talk) 13:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC) |
Dear Ladislav, I am very glad to collaborate with someone I assume is another mathematician on the Rate of Return article. I suspect though that you have misunderstood the point about the application of return methods to logarithmic returns in cases where there are net flows. Flows should be compensated for when calculating logarithmic returns, the same as ordinary returns, and unless you use a time-weighted approach, it is easy to construct counter-examples to the usual composition laws, across time sub-periods, and between currency return and the return in instrument currency. If you are interested, we can collaborate, but please do not delete my contributions without any discussion on the Talk page first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonazo ( talk • contribs) 13:52, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ladislav, I appreciated your comments on my AfD a lot. Would you also like to comment on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bitcoin XT and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bitcoin Improvement Proposal? -- Ysangkok ( talk) 18:46, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, would you like to also comment on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bitcoin_Classic? -- Ysangkok ( talk) 04:50, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 | Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
HocusPocus00 ( talk) 22:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Hey mate, I'm brand new at this, was just wondering what the reason was behind reverting my edit? I'm trying to learn what best practice is. Thanks! DorkyP ( talk) 23:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, DorkyP. Perhaps it has been harsh from me, but it looked that your edit destroyed at least one existing citation, not giving any other to confirm the changes. It is possible that it could have been repaired. When editing, you should make sure that the citations work. I am not against updates, if you actualize both the information and the citation so that it actually works. Ladislav Mecir ( talk) 23:16, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for replying so quickly! I just updated the citations, and thought I double-checked to make sure they worked. Sorry if I broke them! I just noticed they were three years out of date, and thought I could assist. Please let me know if I could do anything differently to get these updated values up and running. DorkyP ( talk) 23:30, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- You can do it, DorkyP but make sure the citations work. They really did not when I reverted your edits. Ladislav Mecir ( talk) 00:13, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Jtbobwaysf (
talk) 09:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
I was wondering if you would be willing to weigh in on whether this draft is better than the current BitFlyer page. A couple editors seemed to think the draft was better and one used the draft to replace the prior page. Then a third editor came by and deleted most of the page. As a result, I am unclear what consensus is or what I should be doing to improve it. Thank you. Sebastien0693 ( talk) 17:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
My name is Tijana and I am a team leader of Wikinvesting.com project. Along with five of my colleagues and friends who are investment and trading enthusiasts, I have started the Wikinvesting which is based on MediaWiki platform.
Wikinvesting is a non-profit, game-changing movement which aims to round up all those individuals who believe that unbiased financial market information and knowledge should be extensively available to everyone. And this is also how I got to you :) Namely, I was searching for information I needed on financial markets and I have noticed that there isn’t a lot of "useful" information available on Wikipedia (to my surprise). In addition to that, the information available through sites such as Investopedia or Investing is tightly controlled by the business owners and hence easily manipulated. Simply, traders like me could not trust such sources in planning the investment and trading strategy...
So, what we want to create is a base where active or aspiring traders, content writers, investors, and generally financial enthusiasts will share their knowledge and experience, discuss investment opportunities, analyze news etc., all for the purpose of wikinvesting becoming the biggest financial knowledge “open source” base. I am not sure if you are familiar with the recent case of GameStop where gaming enthusiasts gather around the GameStop via reddit forum and prevented the hedge funds from sinking it down. They were basically our inspiration to starting this project.
I would love to share more information about this project with you and also discuss future potential opportunities, hence if you are interested, please let me know so we can continue this on our slack channel.
Cheers,
TijanaRistic ( talk) 13:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Jtbobwaysf (
talk) 16:53, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Notice left as a result of error. You can blank this if you like, but I didn't want to revert your talk page. Apologies Jtbobwaysf ( talk) 16:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
The following sanction has been imposed on you:
You are indefinitely banned from the topic of Bitcoin Cash, broadly construed
You have been sanctioned for continued tendentious editing regarding the naming of Bitcoin Cash. The tendentious editing was first documented in 2018, and since then you have continued to WP:REHASH the naming dispute through multiple requests for comment and apparent sealioning.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator as authorised by the community's decision at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Blockchain and cryptocurrencies, and the procedure described by the general sanctions guidelines. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that topic. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction at the administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. — Wug· a·po·des 01:58, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Body shape on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Hope you come back and start editing bitcoin articles again, I would hope that your ban at Bitcoin Cash would not extend to Bitcoin. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf ( talk) 17:06, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Archimedes on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:33, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
I have seen that you are an active contributor to the Bitcoin Cash article. I would like to inform you that there is currently a discussion on the Talk page about splitting Bitcoin SV out from the Bitcoin Cash article. It would be great to get your feedback on the split proposal. torusJKL ( talk) 19:53, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi Ladislav Mecir! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over six months.
In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in six months.
You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:
- Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
- Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
- Paste
{{ Frs user|Ladislav Mecir|limit}}underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month. - Publish the page.
If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.
Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
|
The Teamwork Barnstar |
| Thank you for keeping Bitcoin in shape. you are an awesome wikipedian ! Wuerzele ( talk) 20:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| Ladislav, thanks much for improving and maintaining legality of bitcoin working with Fleetham, so it has become useful and reliable ! Wuerzele ( talk) 15 October 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
Thanks for fixing my style errors in History of Bitcoin I'll try to remember to use lowercase in the future :) Mbevand ( talk) 19:23, 2 January 2017 (UTC) |
- No, problem, Mbevand, you are welcome. This is a matter of convention, and it looks that the competent sources (and WP editors) started to prefer uniform lowercase as described at Bitcoin#Etymology and orthography. Ladislav Mecir ( talk) 20:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:46, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
|
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For being a fair and rational editor. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf ( talk) 18:23, 9 July 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
Thanks for tirelessly maintaining bitcoin-related topics. You were recently mentioned in a 🌶 podcast (episode here). Peace & respect. 84percent ( talk) 10:33, 9 April 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
The Teamwork Barnstar |
| Thank you for asking the right questions that allow me to think more on how to write better contributions to Wikipedia. JeffreyDutch ( talk) 13:01, 16 April 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
The Teamwork Barnstar |
| Appreciate your input to edit for clarity of topic. Always good when reviewers provide advice. Kmccook ( talk) 13:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC) |
Dear Ladislav, I am very glad to collaborate with someone I assume is another mathematician on the Rate of Return article. I suspect though that you have misunderstood the point about the application of return methods to logarithmic returns in cases where there are net flows. Flows should be compensated for when calculating logarithmic returns, the same as ordinary returns, and unless you use a time-weighted approach, it is easy to construct counter-examples to the usual composition laws, across time sub-periods, and between currency return and the return in instrument currency. If you are interested, we can collaborate, but please do not delete my contributions without any discussion on the Talk page first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonazo ( talk • contribs) 13:52, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ladislav, I appreciated your comments on my AfD a lot. Would you also like to comment on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bitcoin XT and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bitcoin Improvement Proposal? -- Ysangkok ( talk) 18:46, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, would you like to also comment on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bitcoin_Classic? -- Ysangkok ( talk) 04:50, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
HocusPocus00 ( talk) 22:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Hey mate, I'm brand new at this, was just wondering what the reason was behind reverting my edit? I'm trying to learn what best practice is. Thanks! DorkyP ( talk) 23:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, DorkyP. Perhaps it has been harsh from me, but it looked that your edit destroyed at least one existing citation, not giving any other to confirm the changes. It is possible that it could have been repaired. When editing, you should make sure that the citations work. I am not against updates, if you actualize both the information and the citation so that it actually works. Ladislav Mecir ( talk) 23:16, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for replying so quickly! I just updated the citations, and thought I double-checked to make sure they worked. Sorry if I broke them! I just noticed they were three years out of date, and thought I could assist. Please let me know if I could do anything differently to get these updated values up and running. DorkyP ( talk) 23:30, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- You can do it, DorkyP but make sure the citations work. They really did not when I reverted your edits. Ladislav Mecir ( talk) 00:13, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Jtbobwaysf (
talk) 09:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
I was wondering if you would be willing to weigh in on whether this draft is better than the current BitFlyer page. A couple editors seemed to think the draft was better and one used the draft to replace the prior page. Then a third editor came by and deleted most of the page. As a result, I am unclear what consensus is or what I should be doing to improve it. Thank you. Sebastien0693 ( talk) 17:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
My name is Tijana and I am a team leader of Wikinvesting.com project. Along with five of my colleagues and friends who are investment and trading enthusiasts, I have started the Wikinvesting which is based on MediaWiki platform.
Wikinvesting is a non-profit, game-changing movement which aims to round up all those individuals who believe that unbiased financial market information and knowledge should be extensively available to everyone. And this is also how I got to you :) Namely, I was searching for information I needed on financial markets and I have noticed that there isn’t a lot of "useful" information available on Wikipedia (to my surprise). In addition to that, the information available through sites such as Investopedia or Investing is tightly controlled by the business owners and hence easily manipulated. Simply, traders like me could not trust such sources in planning the investment and trading strategy...
So, what we want to create is a base where active or aspiring traders, content writers, investors, and generally financial enthusiasts will share their knowledge and experience, discuss investment opportunities, analyze news etc., all for the purpose of wikinvesting becoming the biggest financial knowledge “open source” base. I am not sure if you are familiar with the recent case of GameStop where gaming enthusiasts gather around the GameStop via reddit forum and prevented the hedge funds from sinking it down. They were basically our inspiration to starting this project.
I would love to share more information about this project with you and also discuss future potential opportunities, hence if you are interested, please let me know so we can continue this on our slack channel.
Cheers,
TijanaRistic ( talk) 13:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Jtbobwaysf (
talk) 16:53, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Notice left as a result of error. You can blank this if you like, but I didn't want to revert your talk page. Apologies Jtbobwaysf ( talk) 16:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
The following sanction has been imposed on you:
You are indefinitely banned from the topic of Bitcoin Cash, broadly construed
You have been sanctioned for continued tendentious editing regarding the naming of Bitcoin Cash. The tendentious editing was first documented in 2018, and since then you have continued to WP:REHASH the naming dispute through multiple requests for comment and apparent sealioning.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator as authorised by the community's decision at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Blockchain and cryptocurrencies, and the procedure described by the general sanctions guidelines. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that topic. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction at the administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. — Wug· a·po·des 01:58, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Body shape on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Hope you come back and start editing bitcoin articles again, I would hope that your ban at Bitcoin Cash would not extend to Bitcoin. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf ( talk) 17:06, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Archimedes on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:33, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
I have seen that you are an active contributor to the Bitcoin Cash article. I would like to inform you that there is currently a discussion on the Talk page about splitting Bitcoin SV out from the Bitcoin Cash article. It would be great to get your feedback on the split proposal. torusJKL ( talk) 19:53, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi Ladislav Mecir! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over six months.
In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in six months.
You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:
- Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
- Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
- Paste
{{ Frs user|Ladislav Mecir|limit}}underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month. - Publish the page.
If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.
Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |