This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I agree wholeheartedly that cleaning up the article to at least B class should be our highest priority. I was thinking of just eliminating everything that's there right now and starting from scratch. I've found some links that should be useful for at least getting a start-class article up there, I will post on the project talk page to see if I can get more people to help work on it.- Running On Brains 20:09, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

I've actually started working on the article already...I moved the page to List of severe weather phenomena and then started the page from scratch...come on by and help out. - Running On Brains 03:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

I've looked over the paper...right now it just looks like a study, nothing authoritative (yet). A more important paper might be the DPI paper that is referenced in that report, as that seems to be an authoritative measure of tornado outbreak severity. - Running On Brains 19:32, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

The thermodynamic characteristics of the RFD seem to be very important as to whether it will enable tornadogenesis. Warmer (and more moist; higher theta-e) RFDs are much more likely to result in a tornado, as the air is more buoyant and is better lifted and the flow of air is better stretched and tightened by the meso. Eventually the RFD which produced the tornado also kills it, as it occludes all the way around it and cuts off the inflow, the meso, wall cloud, and tornado withers, although the process may repeat again with a new meso/wall cloud to the southeast or east (assuming the storm is moving northeast or east). So the RFD is responsible for both tornadogenesis and tornadolysis, but the details of this aren't well understood.

During the tornado life cycle, downbursts and microbursts (there are many in a storm, the simple RFD/FFD classification is very rudimentary) may weaken, strengthen, or destroy a tornado, as well as change direction (and speed) of movement. Tornadoes often jut to the north at the end of the life cycle as they constrict and become more tilted as the downdraft blasts the bottom of the vortex and pushes it away from the top, occasionally resulting in some interesting shapes and contortions, as well as the " Wizard of Oz" orientation. Evolauxia 22:24, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't know for sure, but I doubt that emails are permissible sources due to Wikipedia:Verifiability issues which require published sources; peruse Wikipedia:Citing sources. In general, for in-line sourcing using the Wikipedia:Footnotes method, templates are given here: Wikipedia:Citation templates. In your case, you may be able to use the information until someone complains (which may never happen). A good citation for an email is (use the forecaster name but not the email address):

• Schaefer, Joseph. "SPC sample of an email citation", email, 24 April 2007.

My suggestion is to use the email and then I can verify with published sources, they're not going to reveal anything that isn't available somewhere. Evolauxia 14:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

You asked about uploading a school logo. Yes, in general it is okay to use logos of organizations in articles about those organizations. So you could clearly use it for identifying the school in an article about the school or the major section of an article, where the school is discussed.

It still has to fit other Wikipedia policies. You need a copyright tag when you upload. Best to choose the one from the drop down list saying it's a logo. In the description field you should say exactly what it is, who owns it (the school), and where you got it form (the website). You should take care to use a picture that only has the logo, not some unrelated graphic stuff. Also, you need to put it in at least one article or it will be deleted. Add a "fair use rationale" to the image page justifying why it's okay to use in that specific article. There is a page WP:LOGO that describes this, and as a model you can also look around for other school logos to find a good rationale that makes sense to you.

...and that's what it takes to upload a logo. Wikidemo 15:15, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SHSClogo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 16:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:SHSClogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

There is a discussion started by User:Juliancolton at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Meteorology about a proposed/possible new WikiProject called WikiProject Winter storms. Feel free to voice your opinion on the proposal.-- JForget 01:31, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Juliancolton/Active

You have expressed interest in undergoing the Admin coaching program. However, after reviewing your edit history, I feel you may need more experience editing (i.e., >2,500 edits & 4 months of activity) on Wikipedia before you can know for certain your ready to begin the process of becoming an administrator. Therefore, at this time, your application for Admin Coaching has been declined. My suggestion would be to seek adoption from a more experienced user who can help you experience all of the various components of editing an encyclopedia. If you decide adoption is not for you, there is also the editor review process that may help you find areas to improve upon in our editing. If you would like to talk more about this, please feel free to leave me a my talk page. MBisanz talk 21:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Cheers. -- Music 26/ 11 19:58, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active participant in WikiProject Meteorology, WikiProject Severe weather, and/or WikiProject Non-tropical storms. I have made a proposal to start an official assessment page for these three projects, under the WP:METEO banner. Since this would need significant participation to work properly, I'd like input from as many interested parties as possible (even those who may not watch the project pages), so please visit the discussion here and leave your thoughts/opinions. Thanks! - Running On Brains 02:32, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.