From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Korrectorr ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I've been blocked by a "user" User:EvergreenFir for reporting him for him removing my vandalism report. Wikipedia should do a check on this "assistant professor" in Wisconsin. He's clearly promoting his own self interest.

Decline reason:

See WP:NOTTHEM. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 07:22, 27 November 2020 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Korrectorr ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

Hello, I promise I won't do it again. We're just little kids and we feel that these adults have been harassing us. We were only trying in our good faith effort to contribute to the Wikipedia society. Korrectorr ( talk) 07:24, 27 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

Please read the guide to appealing blocks before your next unblock appeal. If there is anything unclear there, you can ask before submitting another appeal. It does look, based on a glance, that Wikipedia may not be the platform that you want to use; if you're looking for a hosting provider for your content, there are plenty of other sites that let you do things that Wikipedia can't let you do.

Furthermore, please note that if you know the user Ericgoesglobal in real life and/or have been communicating with them outside of Wikipedia, you should disclose that fact here; otherwise, it may look like you are attempting to evade scrutiny through the use of multiple accounts. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 07:50, 27 November 2020 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've restored the unblock requests per WP:BLANKING, and declined your speedy requests,as this does not apply to user talk page. As you only seem to want to attack other users, I've removed your ability to edit this page. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 08:26, 27 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

( block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Hello, Korrectorr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Eric Feng".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 13:48, 27 May 2021 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Korrectorr ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I've been blocked by a "user" User:EvergreenFir for reporting him for him removing my vandalism report. Wikipedia should do a check on this "assistant professor" in Wisconsin. He's clearly promoting his own self interest.

Decline reason:

See WP:NOTTHEM. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 07:22, 27 November 2020 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Korrectorr ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

Hello, I promise I won't do it again. We're just little kids and we feel that these adults have been harassing us. We were only trying in our good faith effort to contribute to the Wikipedia society. Korrectorr ( talk) 07:24, 27 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

Please read the guide to appealing blocks before your next unblock appeal. If there is anything unclear there, you can ask before submitting another appeal. It does look, based on a glance, that Wikipedia may not be the platform that you want to use; if you're looking for a hosting provider for your content, there are plenty of other sites that let you do things that Wikipedia can't let you do.

Furthermore, please note that if you know the user Ericgoesglobal in real life and/or have been communicating with them outside of Wikipedia, you should disclose that fact here; otherwise, it may look like you are attempting to evade scrutiny through the use of multiple accounts. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 07:50, 27 November 2020 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've restored the unblock requests per WP:BLANKING, and declined your speedy requests,as this does not apply to user talk page. As you only seem to want to attack other users, I've removed your ability to edit this page. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 08:26, 27 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

( block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Hello, Korrectorr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Eric Feng".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 13:48, 27 May 2021 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook