- Sony was rumored to have begun shipping development kits...
First of all, rumors don't belong on Wikipedia. If it was a rumor, then the statement shouldn't remain in the article. However, the source VG247 clearly states that "Multiple source have confirmed..." in one of the opening paragraphs. Do you agree that VG247 is a reliable source? If so, then this statement from them should be considered reliable. If not, then it's a big issue. VG247 is being used as a source in a lot of articles, so if you are challenging its legitimacy, then I suspect there are going to be a lot of people who disagree. Let's settle this here or take it to the next level. -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 00:40, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- Why are you writing this on my talk page? The article has a talk page too you know. Use it.
Kapitaenk (
talk) 02:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- Since this was between you and me, I figured we could settle this. Now that you've removed the statement without responding to me directly, I see that I was sadly mistaken. --
GoneIn60 (
talk) 04:26, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- I think we agree it is quite obvious that Sony sent out Dev-Kits back in 2012. But back then it was a rumor, and that is also the basis of the article you linked. Stick to the rules, don't treat it as a fact until you have a proper reference.
- BTW, it is fine if you state in the history section that there were rumors about Dev-Kits being sent out. This is a fact, and I was trying to emphasize this before I removed the statement. Kapitaenk ( talk) 06:34, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- Since this was between you and me, I figured we could settle this. Now that you've removed the statement without responding to me directly, I see that I was sadly mistaken. --
GoneIn60 (
talk) 04:26, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
|
The Original Barnstar |
| your help with AMD APU is absolutely outstanding! It needs some work yet, but it looks much, much better already!!!! Aunva6 ( talk) 04:50, 19 March 2013 (UTC) |
Why thank you. :) Kapitaenk ( talk) 04:57, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited AMD Accelerated Processing Unit, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages SoC and BGA ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 19:55, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Sony was rumored to have begun shipping development kits...
First of all, rumors don't belong on Wikipedia. If it was a rumor, then the statement shouldn't remain in the article. However, the source VG247 clearly states that "Multiple source have confirmed..." in one of the opening paragraphs. Do you agree that VG247 is a reliable source? If so, then this statement from them should be considered reliable. If not, then it's a big issue. VG247 is being used as a source in a lot of articles, so if you are challenging its legitimacy, then I suspect there are going to be a lot of people who disagree. Let's settle this here or take it to the next level. -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 00:40, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- Why are you writing this on my talk page? The article has a talk page too you know. Use it.
Kapitaenk (
talk) 02:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- Since this was between you and me, I figured we could settle this. Now that you've removed the statement without responding to me directly, I see that I was sadly mistaken. --
GoneIn60 (
talk) 04:26, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- I think we agree it is quite obvious that Sony sent out Dev-Kits back in 2012. But back then it was a rumor, and that is also the basis of the article you linked. Stick to the rules, don't treat it as a fact until you have a proper reference.
- BTW, it is fine if you state in the history section that there were rumors about Dev-Kits being sent out. This is a fact, and I was trying to emphasize this before I removed the statement. Kapitaenk ( talk) 06:34, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- Since this was between you and me, I figured we could settle this. Now that you've removed the statement without responding to me directly, I see that I was sadly mistaken. --
GoneIn60 (
talk) 04:26, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| your help with AMD APU is absolutely outstanding! It needs some work yet, but it looks much, much better already!!!! Aunva6 ( talk) 04:50, 19 March 2013 (UTC) |
Why thank you. :) Kapitaenk ( talk) 04:57, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited AMD Accelerated Processing Unit, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages SoC and BGA ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 19:55, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)