From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of U.S. states and territories by population

I don't necessarily disagree with your edits on List of U.S. states and territories by population, but you should read WP:BRD. After I reverted you bold edit, your next step should be discussion, preferably at Talk:List of U.S. states and territories by population. Large-scale changes to the page like this require consensus, even if it that simply means no opposition to the proposed edit. See the current talk page, where I made a proposal to remove two columns, then only made the edit after no discussion for a month. This is somehow a page that attracts lots of one-time, drive-by edits, especially updates that don't fully update every table column, or reference from year to year. It's a pain to try to keep the page self-consistent and correct, so please be careful next time you edit it (if ever). kennethaw88talk 23:36, 30 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Megan Lynn has been accepted

Megan Lynn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits, you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy ( talk) 03:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Helen Van Etten (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes ( Talk) ( Contribs) ( Articles) 17:06, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, KSPoliticsGuy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Johannes ( Talk) ( Contribs) ( Articles) 17:06, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of U.S. states and territories by population

I don't necessarily disagree with your edits on List of U.S. states and territories by population, but you should read WP:BRD. After I reverted you bold edit, your next step should be discussion, preferably at Talk:List of U.S. states and territories by population. Large-scale changes to the page like this require consensus, even if it that simply means no opposition to the proposed edit. See the current talk page, where I made a proposal to remove two columns, then only made the edit after no discussion for a month. This is somehow a page that attracts lots of one-time, drive-by edits, especially updates that don't fully update every table column, or reference from year to year. It's a pain to try to keep the page self-consistent and correct, so please be careful next time you edit it (if ever). kennethaw88talk 23:36, 30 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Megan Lynn has been accepted

Megan Lynn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits, you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy ( talk) 03:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Helen Van Etten (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes ( Talk) ( Contribs) ( Articles) 17:06, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, KSPoliticsGuy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Johannes ( Talk) ( Contribs) ( Articles) 17:06, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook