This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
About this: Did you read the article, or are you guessing about its contents based on a single sentence in its very short abstract? WhatamIdoing ( talk) 22:15, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure how following a reliable source has anything to do with "incorrect beliefs": either it matches the source (not "the abstract"), or it doesn't.
The original sentence made these three claims:
You have reduced it to these two:
I assume that your concern about "in conflict with the abstract" is about the one that you removed entirely. The short abstract has barely half a sentence related to this: "...greater knowledge of the physiology of the body." The article itself says rather more. I'm not sure how you decide that this phrase is "in conflict with" the point, especially since you haven't actually read the source, and I don't understand how this could "boost an incorrect belief". I don't even know what this incorrect belief is. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 22:33, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
About this: Did you read the article, or are you guessing about its contents based on a single sentence in its very short abstract? WhatamIdoing ( talk) 22:15, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure how following a reliable source has anything to do with "incorrect beliefs": either it matches the source (not "the abstract"), or it doesn't.
The original sentence made these three claims:
You have reduced it to these two:
I assume that your concern about "in conflict with the abstract" is about the one that you removed entirely. The short abstract has barely half a sentence related to this: "...greater knowledge of the physiology of the body." The article itself says rather more. I'm not sure how you decide that this phrase is "in conflict with" the point, especially since you haven't actually read the source, and I don't understand how this could "boost an incorrect belief". I don't even know what this incorrect belief is. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 22:33, 10 October 2013 (UTC)