This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).
Hi there, sorry for the confusion. I can reassure you that I do not believe any Epstein conspiracy theories- nor would I ever impose my personal views onto Wikipedia if I did- but was just trying to point out the ruling of what caused his death was a source of great controversy. I also thought pointing that out would be okay since the title of the article was "Death of Jeffrey Epstein", not "Suicide of", which therefore made me think Wikipedia editors who were antecedent to myself had sought to preserve ambiguity for the sake of neutrality, as it were. -- 222.152.255.9 ( talk) 02:08, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
So I put this right. Perhaps send this for comment by a British English native group if you are still unsure as to correct usage. Thanks. 212.236.40.78 ( talk) 06:36, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: Thanks for being an awesome Wikipedia rollbacker! 🎉🎉🎉 111.65.71.215 ( talk) 09:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).
Hi there, sorry for the confusion. I can reassure you that I do not believe any Epstein conspiracy theories- nor would I ever impose my personal views onto Wikipedia if I did- but was just trying to point out the ruling of what caused his death was a source of great controversy. I also thought pointing that out would be okay since the title of the article was "Death of Jeffrey Epstein", not "Suicide of", which therefore made me think Wikipedia editors who were antecedent to myself had sought to preserve ambiguity for the sake of neutrality, as it were. -- 222.152.255.9 ( talk) 02:08, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
So I put this right. Perhaps send this for comment by a British English native group if you are still unsure as to correct usage. Thanks. 212.236.40.78 ( talk) 06:36, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: Thanks for being an awesome Wikipedia rollbacker! 🎉🎉🎉 111.65.71.215 ( talk) 09:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)