This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
What on earth are you up to? I am not sure where you come from - but hey I think thats a bit odd to put that up for Afd - I really think that shows a lack of agf and a bit hasty - it has been up for about 5 mintutes? Satu Suro 03:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
And as you are so incredibly anonymous - if you are going to keep this - at least put it at the Australian afd if you are so keen - why on earth didnt you simply allow a prod - what makes such a difference? Satu Suro 03:05, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Of course there is some level of irritation from me, what would you expect? - it was up for about two minutes and I havent even had a chance to put in the extra couple of references which would radically diminish any need for an afd anyway. the relevance would be quite clear - but you still havent put into the australian afd list yet seeing you are so keen. If there had been agf - a prod would have been sufficient and it could have been easily dealt with - i think you might take your context a little too seriously as well. If I ever seek to check new arts (1) popups - whow many edits - I as a practice never would throw an afd at a user around for a while - that I consider is something to be a little too hasty and out of context - if you peruse the general history of the Australian afd's over the last year or so - almost all are for fly bys and red links - the general practice at australian afd is for really stupid articles to end up there - I do not in view of what I had planned to add to the article would have even considered putting it up if i thought that it would lack WP:N - god i need you at the WP Indonesia project - you could cleanup about 2,000 articles for me like that with that level of enthusiasm - Satu Suro 03:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Any editor who continues to blatantly vandalize any article should be blocked. I have the right to request anyone to be blocked for that specific reason. It is not a threat! Additionally, I am not a child, I am an adult and I will not be spoken (by anyone) in the tone/fashion. I find that to be very disrespectful and uncivil. KM*hearts*MC ( talk) 06:26, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
{{adminhelp}}
So, I'm pretty sure that I created the account
User:Beeblebrox just before I created this account. (It is the correct spelling of the name), but I forgot what the password was or whatever and just created another account. I've been doing this long enough now that I'd like to turn the other account into a
doppleganger, but since the account exists, even though it has 0 contributions, I don't know if I'd be crossing some sort of line by just redirecting it here. I guess technically it already is a doppleganger just sitting there really... So anyway, can I do that, can you help, etc. Thanks for your time.
Beeblbrox (
talk) 07:14, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Was Spike milligans joke with peter sellers (or versa vice) long before Ouglas Adams even dreamt of Zaphod - in this case have a parrot for your new head - and keep your fingers well away from that beak it can clean cut :) - Satu Suro 08:22, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Just have a look at this talk page ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Amarnath_land_transfer_controversy) I was wondering if you think I was out of line. I stated in my edit (and often times otherwise) "Use discussion facility before changing and unchanging, as well as redirecting." I did the same in saying I was requesting a lock (which is ultimately out of my hand anyways. But did I do the right thing in my response? Often times those involved in the debate (I can imagine those vilifying me are from the Indian side) get too emotional (see this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Amarnath_land_transfer_controversy#NPOV_Status.3D (which I also just realised he made the more 'productive' edit after his name-calling).
ps- Just as a heads up, I'm running this text by another admin too. Lihaas ( talk) 18:15, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
do u know if ur allowed to have more than one adopter -- Daisy404 ( talk) 18:55, 24 August 2008 (UTC)daisy404-- Daisy404 ( talk) 18:55, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
...I will be throwing pies again! Ecoleetage ( talk) 21:43, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Karthik Kumar N G (Vishwa), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karthik Kumar N G (Vishwa). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? TerriersFan ( talk) 16:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Current date and time was created because I couldn't find a simple page with the whole date and time on it. The little clock in the corner doesn't give enough info. Every time the page is loaded, it will update the date and time on it. It is funny that something so small can cause so much work. It wasn't meant as a joke either. I don't want to have to load Wikipedia:Magic words and scroll all the way down to the date section and then figure out the date and time. LA (If you reply here, please leave me a {{ Talkback}} message on my talk page.) @ 03:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Someone has been mis-spending their youth an awful lot creating the Antarctica University website. The clinchers for me were: the "giving" page and the list of trustees which, strangely, matches the characters in Glengarry Glen Ross. — RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 17:33, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey. Wanted to know if all the links that still feature the old title are supposed to automatically update? I've been changing some. Is there a time limit for the redirect thing (i.e. -- a point in which the old link will no longer work)? Were you planning on changing these links? -- James26 ( talk) 06:16, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
What are you talking about? What links? There are no links in my talk page!! Open your eyes and think!!-- navy.blue 84 ( talk) 17:40, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
When you say that you have changed your mind, do you mean you no longer want anything renamed or that you would now like to be renamed to Beeblebrox (rather than have that as a doppleganger)? WJBscribe (talk) 21:46, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
No problem, done. You should be able to recreate Beeblbrox via this link - let me know if you have difficulties and I will do it for you. WJBscribe (talk) 22:32, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
You are a nerd. I bet you play World of Warcraft and wear glasses. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.131.132.246 ( talk) 02:18, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you for helping with A Greensill's article. Kia ora! WahineToa ( talk) 00:55, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
You labeled me "personal attack" and then denialed that truth. Then you admitted it and label me "attack", again. I hoped you withdrew it. Hhttp://xiaonei.com/activate.do?id=237001796&vc=6661373280 校内网 - 登录owever, now you escape it with saying I was non-sense and didn't give me a reason. I'm not satisfied with this. I'm waiting for your reply till now. -- 虞海 ( talk) 09:25, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
I still waiting your answer on my talk MasterYodaSR ( talk) 11:42, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Nur Atikah Nabilah, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Troikoalogo ( talk) 16:50, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
I saw that you checked out and updated a new article I created today about YouTube celebrity and dancer Corey Vidal. In the Discussion page, it is requested an image of him be uploaded to the article to improve the quality, but I am unable to do so because of the newness of my account.
Would I be able to provide an image to you (free of copyrights and ready to be uploaded) that you could upload and add to the article? I've taken the liberty of uploading the image here: http://www.vaylin.com/CoreyVidalAt888.jpg
Vaylin ( talk) 05:50, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
You realize, I'm sure, that "asserts notability" is a CSD criteria and is unrelated to either PROD or AfD? You're entitled to remove the prod, of course. I just wanted to point out that, in your edit summary, you refuted an argument that was not made. Avruch T 23:01, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
nomi887 ( talk) 05:17, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for telling me what to do. I wouldn't have noticed without you telling me.
Thank you very much for giving me suggestion, I did what you told me to do, erase the information that may relate to my real life, I feel welcome already, haha.
Aireii ( talk) 05:53, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
I wasn't disagreeing with you about User:RhoLyokoWarrior. I wanted the page deleted, and I left your speedy tag in place. My concern was that someone else might say it didn't qualify for speedy deletion, and in that case there would have been an MfD to deal with it. -- Eastmain ( talk) 18:13, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (166/43/7). I appreciate your comments and in my actions as an administrator I will endeavor to maintain the trust you have placed in me. I am honored by your trust and your support. Thank you very much for saying that you feel I am obviously acting in the best interest of this project, I really appreciate that. Thank you, Cirt ( talk) 02:19, 16 September 2008 (UTC) |
A tag has been placed on Talk:Wokai, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Talk:Wokai|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
Bongomatic (
talk) 05:16, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
You wrote: "I would caution the nominator to restrict his nomination comments to the article itself and not the person who wrote it." In what way did I make comments on the author? Bongomatic ( talk) 23:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
I do not understand why you would redirect a page about a fictional school that has sufficency with WP:N. Geez! RoryReloaded ( talk) 09:56, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for helping with the efforts I made on the article on Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. I tried again to put this in a category entitled "Religious studies journals" (which I know does exist because journals such as Zygon are so classified). Let us hope that your good work in drawing this to the attention of the Wiki-projects that are relevant to this article will bear fruit! ACEOREVIVED ( talk) 16:28, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
I didn`t undertand why you want this page to be deleted. I started it from scratch with the Official Results along with every other result page from Athletics at the 2008 Summer Paralympics. COuld you please explain it better and don't delete the pages I've been creating so that all the Paralympic Games results are complete. Thank you Saulopro ( talk) 18:55, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
What on earth are you up to? I am not sure where you come from - but hey I think thats a bit odd to put that up for Afd - I really think that shows a lack of agf and a bit hasty - it has been up for about 5 mintutes? Satu Suro 03:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
And as you are so incredibly anonymous - if you are going to keep this - at least put it at the Australian afd if you are so keen - why on earth didnt you simply allow a prod - what makes such a difference? Satu Suro 03:05, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Of course there is some level of irritation from me, what would you expect? - it was up for about two minutes and I havent even had a chance to put in the extra couple of references which would radically diminish any need for an afd anyway. the relevance would be quite clear - but you still havent put into the australian afd list yet seeing you are so keen. If there had been agf - a prod would have been sufficient and it could have been easily dealt with - i think you might take your context a little too seriously as well. If I ever seek to check new arts (1) popups - whow many edits - I as a practice never would throw an afd at a user around for a while - that I consider is something to be a little too hasty and out of context - if you peruse the general history of the Australian afd's over the last year or so - almost all are for fly bys and red links - the general practice at australian afd is for really stupid articles to end up there - I do not in view of what I had planned to add to the article would have even considered putting it up if i thought that it would lack WP:N - god i need you at the WP Indonesia project - you could cleanup about 2,000 articles for me like that with that level of enthusiasm - Satu Suro 03:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Any editor who continues to blatantly vandalize any article should be blocked. I have the right to request anyone to be blocked for that specific reason. It is not a threat! Additionally, I am not a child, I am an adult and I will not be spoken (by anyone) in the tone/fashion. I find that to be very disrespectful and uncivil. KM*hearts*MC ( talk) 06:26, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
{{adminhelp}}
So, I'm pretty sure that I created the account
User:Beeblebrox just before I created this account. (It is the correct spelling of the name), but I forgot what the password was or whatever and just created another account. I've been doing this long enough now that I'd like to turn the other account into a
doppleganger, but since the account exists, even though it has 0 contributions, I don't know if I'd be crossing some sort of line by just redirecting it here. I guess technically it already is a doppleganger just sitting there really... So anyway, can I do that, can you help, etc. Thanks for your time.
Beeblbrox (
talk) 07:14, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Was Spike milligans joke with peter sellers (or versa vice) long before Ouglas Adams even dreamt of Zaphod - in this case have a parrot for your new head - and keep your fingers well away from that beak it can clean cut :) - Satu Suro 08:22, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Just have a look at this talk page ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Amarnath_land_transfer_controversy) I was wondering if you think I was out of line. I stated in my edit (and often times otherwise) "Use discussion facility before changing and unchanging, as well as redirecting." I did the same in saying I was requesting a lock (which is ultimately out of my hand anyways. But did I do the right thing in my response? Often times those involved in the debate (I can imagine those vilifying me are from the Indian side) get too emotional (see this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Amarnath_land_transfer_controversy#NPOV_Status.3D (which I also just realised he made the more 'productive' edit after his name-calling).
ps- Just as a heads up, I'm running this text by another admin too. Lihaas ( talk) 18:15, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
do u know if ur allowed to have more than one adopter -- Daisy404 ( talk) 18:55, 24 August 2008 (UTC)daisy404-- Daisy404 ( talk) 18:55, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
...I will be throwing pies again! Ecoleetage ( talk) 21:43, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Karthik Kumar N G (Vishwa), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karthik Kumar N G (Vishwa). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? TerriersFan ( talk) 16:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Current date and time was created because I couldn't find a simple page with the whole date and time on it. The little clock in the corner doesn't give enough info. Every time the page is loaded, it will update the date and time on it. It is funny that something so small can cause so much work. It wasn't meant as a joke either. I don't want to have to load Wikipedia:Magic words and scroll all the way down to the date section and then figure out the date and time. LA (If you reply here, please leave me a {{ Talkback}} message on my talk page.) @ 03:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Someone has been mis-spending their youth an awful lot creating the Antarctica University website. The clinchers for me were: the "giving" page and the list of trustees which, strangely, matches the characters in Glengarry Glen Ross. — RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 17:33, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey. Wanted to know if all the links that still feature the old title are supposed to automatically update? I've been changing some. Is there a time limit for the redirect thing (i.e. -- a point in which the old link will no longer work)? Were you planning on changing these links? -- James26 ( talk) 06:16, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
What are you talking about? What links? There are no links in my talk page!! Open your eyes and think!!-- navy.blue 84 ( talk) 17:40, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
When you say that you have changed your mind, do you mean you no longer want anything renamed or that you would now like to be renamed to Beeblebrox (rather than have that as a doppleganger)? WJBscribe (talk) 21:46, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
No problem, done. You should be able to recreate Beeblbrox via this link - let me know if you have difficulties and I will do it for you. WJBscribe (talk) 22:32, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
You are a nerd. I bet you play World of Warcraft and wear glasses. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.131.132.246 ( talk) 02:18, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you for helping with A Greensill's article. Kia ora! WahineToa ( talk) 00:55, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
You labeled me "personal attack" and then denialed that truth. Then you admitted it and label me "attack", again. I hoped you withdrew it. Hhttp://xiaonei.com/activate.do?id=237001796&vc=6661373280 校内网 - 登录owever, now you escape it with saying I was non-sense and didn't give me a reason. I'm not satisfied with this. I'm waiting for your reply till now. -- 虞海 ( talk) 09:25, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
I still waiting your answer on my talk MasterYodaSR ( talk) 11:42, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Nur Atikah Nabilah, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Troikoalogo ( talk) 16:50, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
I saw that you checked out and updated a new article I created today about YouTube celebrity and dancer Corey Vidal. In the Discussion page, it is requested an image of him be uploaded to the article to improve the quality, but I am unable to do so because of the newness of my account.
Would I be able to provide an image to you (free of copyrights and ready to be uploaded) that you could upload and add to the article? I've taken the liberty of uploading the image here: http://www.vaylin.com/CoreyVidalAt888.jpg
Vaylin ( talk) 05:50, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
You realize, I'm sure, that "asserts notability" is a CSD criteria and is unrelated to either PROD or AfD? You're entitled to remove the prod, of course. I just wanted to point out that, in your edit summary, you refuted an argument that was not made. Avruch T 23:01, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
nomi887 ( talk) 05:17, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for telling me what to do. I wouldn't have noticed without you telling me.
Thank you very much for giving me suggestion, I did what you told me to do, erase the information that may relate to my real life, I feel welcome already, haha.
Aireii ( talk) 05:53, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
I wasn't disagreeing with you about User:RhoLyokoWarrior. I wanted the page deleted, and I left your speedy tag in place. My concern was that someone else might say it didn't qualify for speedy deletion, and in that case there would have been an MfD to deal with it. -- Eastmain ( talk) 18:13, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (166/43/7). I appreciate your comments and in my actions as an administrator I will endeavor to maintain the trust you have placed in me. I am honored by your trust and your support. Thank you very much for saying that you feel I am obviously acting in the best interest of this project, I really appreciate that. Thank you, Cirt ( talk) 02:19, 16 September 2008 (UTC) |
A tag has been placed on Talk:Wokai, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Talk:Wokai|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
Bongomatic (
talk) 05:16, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
You wrote: "I would caution the nominator to restrict his nomination comments to the article itself and not the person who wrote it." In what way did I make comments on the author? Bongomatic ( talk) 23:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
I do not understand why you would redirect a page about a fictional school that has sufficency with WP:N. Geez! RoryReloaded ( talk) 09:56, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for helping with the efforts I made on the article on Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. I tried again to put this in a category entitled "Religious studies journals" (which I know does exist because journals such as Zygon are so classified). Let us hope that your good work in drawing this to the attention of the Wiki-projects that are relevant to this article will bear fruit! ACEOREVIVED ( talk) 16:28, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
I didn`t undertand why you want this page to be deleted. I started it from scratch with the Official Results along with every other result page from Athletics at the 2008 Summer Paralympics. COuld you please explain it better and don't delete the pages I've been creating so that all the Paralympic Games results are complete. Thank you Saulopro ( talk) 18:55, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |