This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Jon. I've repeated your request at WP:SCHOOLS on the article tp. The article looks very good already - probably due to your experience in working on FAs. I'll not do much to it because it's the sort of thing I would pick out of the GAC list, and I would like to remain neutral if I were to review it. I'll be watching it closely though. -- Kudpung ( talk) 05:57, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
I am watching and left a note on the IP's talk page. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 22:34, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Since I see you are doing GANs, do you have time to review Los Angeles Daily News (historic)? I would be happy to do one of yours, or else to do another at random.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 15:51, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
You should weigh the "fail" vs. "hold" decision carefully. It takes 2-3 months for a reviewer to get to an article, so that leads me to lean toward "hold" if the editors are willing to work with the reviewer. Since you have "failed" the article, I would suggest letting someone else have a chance to review the article. That decision may automactically impose a serious delay. Some articles need 3 or 4 GA reviews before making it, and the article benefits from having different reviewers weigh in. Thanks, Racepacket ( talk) 10:20, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Volume 3, Issue 3 • Fall 2010 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
While I do appreciate that the distinction is made at the beginning of the article, I do not feel it is sufficient enough. I also feel that the names of leaders of any religion other than The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints should not be included in an article titled "List of Latter-day Saints." There is a reason why there are other articles titled "Former Latter-day Saints," "Community of Christ," "Rigdonite," etc. It would be entirely appropriate to include those names of leaders on their respective sites and it also means that the lists I have been trying to delete are not lost on Wikipedia forever. I understand that they are "related" and the fact that each one of these movements is identified on the article for the mainstream LDS church does not bother me because it pertains to the history of the church, but these leaders are not "famous" LDS members/former members. I would even understand including the very first leader of each separate movement, but not each leader those movements have ever had because once they made a distinction between what they believe as opposed to what the LDS church believes, they would no longer consider themselves Latter-day Saints either. Please, if there is someone else I can communicate with, let me know because (as you've probably guessed) I am fairly new to this, but I do feel strongly about this that I would like someone to consider my opinion. Babyd2009 ( talk) 02:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
I think that the school colors do need to be well cited because this is much controversy over what the actualy school colors are. I thnk you dearly for your consideration on this issue. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwerty5225 ( talk • contribs) 03:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
This is not vandalism. Do you count the students daily? Kent4Eva ( talk) 04:41, 23 November 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kent4Eva ( talk • contribs) 04:23, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
my point is that changing a word for the sake of changing it is not a good reason. And yes, after the enrollment number it says "(2010)" so that it is clearly dated (the report came out in August 2010). -- JonRidinger ( talk) 04:54, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Jon, I've sent out a friendly request to everyone to continue talking about this school on its tp. It's not fair using your kitchen as a chat room, and anyway, with so many people involved, the discussion now needs centralising. -- Kudpung ( talk) 04:57, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
<
Neutralhomer wishes you a Happy Thanksgiving and hopes your day is full of good times, good food, good family, good football, a good parade and a good nap...then shopping tomorrow. :) Have a Great Day! :) Spread the joy of Thanksgiving by adding {{subst:HappyThanksgiving}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
Just wanted to let you know that the 2010 Census should be coming out on New Year's Eve Night. Not sure what time, but that's what the Census website said. Other information is being spaced out from then to 2013 and further. :( But the population stuff is coming out New Year's Eve Night. Just some FYI. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Neutralhomer wishes you a Merry Christmas and hopes your day is full of the true spirit of the day. Plus, good food, good family and good times. :) Have a Great Day! :) Spread the joy of Christmas by adding {{subst:User:Neutralhomer/MerryChristmas}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
Replied at the talk page; I don't think it wrong to have multiple establishment categories. Have a happy Christmas :-) Nyttend ( talk) 13:08, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
<font=3> Merry Christmas / Happy Holidays, Happy New Year, and all the best in 2011! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:43, 26 December 2010 (UTC) |
---|
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Jon. I've repeated your request at WP:SCHOOLS on the article tp. The article looks very good already - probably due to your experience in working on FAs. I'll not do much to it because it's the sort of thing I would pick out of the GAC list, and I would like to remain neutral if I were to review it. I'll be watching it closely though. -- Kudpung ( talk) 05:57, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
I am watching and left a note on the IP's talk page. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 22:34, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Since I see you are doing GANs, do you have time to review Los Angeles Daily News (historic)? I would be happy to do one of yours, or else to do another at random.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 15:51, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
You should weigh the "fail" vs. "hold" decision carefully. It takes 2-3 months for a reviewer to get to an article, so that leads me to lean toward "hold" if the editors are willing to work with the reviewer. Since you have "failed" the article, I would suggest letting someone else have a chance to review the article. That decision may automactically impose a serious delay. Some articles need 3 or 4 GA reviews before making it, and the article benefits from having different reviewers weigh in. Thanks, Racepacket ( talk) 10:20, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Volume 3, Issue 3 • Fall 2010 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
While I do appreciate that the distinction is made at the beginning of the article, I do not feel it is sufficient enough. I also feel that the names of leaders of any religion other than The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints should not be included in an article titled "List of Latter-day Saints." There is a reason why there are other articles titled "Former Latter-day Saints," "Community of Christ," "Rigdonite," etc. It would be entirely appropriate to include those names of leaders on their respective sites and it also means that the lists I have been trying to delete are not lost on Wikipedia forever. I understand that they are "related" and the fact that each one of these movements is identified on the article for the mainstream LDS church does not bother me because it pertains to the history of the church, but these leaders are not "famous" LDS members/former members. I would even understand including the very first leader of each separate movement, but not each leader those movements have ever had because once they made a distinction between what they believe as opposed to what the LDS church believes, they would no longer consider themselves Latter-day Saints either. Please, if there is someone else I can communicate with, let me know because (as you've probably guessed) I am fairly new to this, but I do feel strongly about this that I would like someone to consider my opinion. Babyd2009 ( talk) 02:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
I think that the school colors do need to be well cited because this is much controversy over what the actualy school colors are. I thnk you dearly for your consideration on this issue. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwerty5225 ( talk • contribs) 03:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
This is not vandalism. Do you count the students daily? Kent4Eva ( talk) 04:41, 23 November 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kent4Eva ( talk • contribs) 04:23, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
my point is that changing a word for the sake of changing it is not a good reason. And yes, after the enrollment number it says "(2010)" so that it is clearly dated (the report came out in August 2010). -- JonRidinger ( talk) 04:54, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Jon, I've sent out a friendly request to everyone to continue talking about this school on its tp. It's not fair using your kitchen as a chat room, and anyway, with so many people involved, the discussion now needs centralising. -- Kudpung ( talk) 04:57, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
<
Neutralhomer wishes you a Happy Thanksgiving and hopes your day is full of good times, good food, good family, good football, a good parade and a good nap...then shopping tomorrow. :) Have a Great Day! :) Spread the joy of Thanksgiving by adding {{subst:HappyThanksgiving}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
Just wanted to let you know that the 2010 Census should be coming out on New Year's Eve Night. Not sure what time, but that's what the Census website said. Other information is being spaced out from then to 2013 and further. :( But the population stuff is coming out New Year's Eve Night. Just some FYI. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Neutralhomer wishes you a Merry Christmas and hopes your day is full of the true spirit of the day. Plus, good food, good family and good times. :) Have a Great Day! :) Spread the joy of Christmas by adding {{subst:User:Neutralhomer/MerryChristmas}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
Replied at the talk page; I don't think it wrong to have multiple establishment categories. Have a happy Christmas :-) Nyttend ( talk) 13:08, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
<font=3> Merry Christmas / Happy Holidays, Happy New Year, and all the best in 2011! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:43, 26 December 2010 (UTC) |
---|