This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for reviewing Sui juris. Please direct me to the information page(s) that will help me create a quality page for Sui juris. I would attempt a good repair of Sui iuris but it appears to be controlled by the church sui iuris. I meant no violation while my attempt to produce Sui juris I only started with definitions and planned to add the more working aspects of the term. Maybe it should be applied to the church sui iuris as a section or perhaps other. My research into sui iuris finds nothing while sui juris is plentiful. If I am trying to hard to make something out of sui juris, tell me so and I will find another area of interest, I am easy to please. Suijur ( talk) 21:31, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Many thanks for the advice, I've made anote of it for future uae. Murgatroyd49 ( talk) 11:00, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
I have made an article "City Express Money Transfer" however, it was deleted by another user "RHaworth".
Please let me know what things do I need to remove/ change or edit. I am desperate now because I had made two articles and none of them were approved. Please I need you kind assistance. PLEASE!!!
( Your suraj ( talk) 03:59, 21 January 2019 (UTC))
Hey there! I saw you were a previous editor on this article, and I wanted to let you know I posted on the talk page. I was hoping to get some feedback about this proposal, and so I was not sure who else to notify. Seems there has been some meta-controversy that I only just now noticed, so I would like to avoid getting into that.
Many Thanks, ― Matthew J. Long -Talk- ☖ 20:26, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
This profile has been maliciously attacked by the user "BestTandoori" and we cannot have libelous information on Wiki. Although citations are present, they do not accurately reflect the content. For instance, certain terms utilized such as "lobbying" never happened nor did the public in figure in question ever say he was. Additionally, these users have strategically removed information that holistically also represent the overall contributions of this public figure, with intentional removals of positive accolades. I previously factually represented both the positive and negative when I first amended this profile. Malicious accounts like "BestTandoori" are solely made to instigate and vandalize this public figures character. I did not have time to fix them at this present moment. I will incorporate accurate and reliable citations with facts not opinions, but my efforts will be thwarted if they continue to be removed by accounts such as this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sigma58 ( talk • contribs) 23:30, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you I believe I turned on the twinkle. So all I have to do is add ˜˜~ or ˜˜˜~ ? Or will it automatically show up now as signed?
Thank you, I believed it constituted as vandalism " is the act of editing the project in a malicious manner that is intentionally disruptive. Vandalism includes the addition, removal, or modification of the text or other material that is either humorous, nonsensical, a hoax, or that is an offensive, humiliating, or otherwise degrading nature." The tags you mentioned are more specific. No conflict of interest exists, I have been editing many other pages, this just seems to be the only one that has such drastic changes. I hope you understand that when you spend a long time on something, to have someone change it with ill intent is in itself should be a conflict of interest, especially when that page was created to solely attack the profile of the public figure in question. I am spirited when it comes to these types of attacks because it goes against the reason I would like to become a good Wiki contributor. I will send an email to the public figure to let them know this is happening if it continues, just so they can deal with it, since it has taken so much of my time.
My goal is to be fair and holistic to everyone.
Thirdly, how do I create a page? I would like to create a page for the public figure Karen Wang from BC? I searched and it does not exist. I believe she is notable enough because she has been in the news so much and deserves a profile that fairly gives a holistic overview of her current endeavours. It says an admin needs to create one. Your assistance in ensuring I am creating one properly and following all guidelines would be appreciated. I intend to apply all of your feedback and thank you again for your time.
Here is a link that gives you an idea of the candidate I am referring to.
˜˜˜˜ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sigma58 ( talk • contribs) 16:00, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
References
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for reviewing Sui juris. Please direct me to the information page(s) that will help me create a quality page for Sui juris. I would attempt a good repair of Sui iuris but it appears to be controlled by the church sui iuris. I meant no violation while my attempt to produce Sui juris I only started with definitions and planned to add the more working aspects of the term. Maybe it should be applied to the church sui iuris as a section or perhaps other. My research into sui iuris finds nothing while sui juris is plentiful. If I am trying to hard to make something out of sui juris, tell me so and I will find another area of interest, I am easy to please. Suijur ( talk) 21:31, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Many thanks for the advice, I've made anote of it for future uae. Murgatroyd49 ( talk) 11:00, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
I have made an article "City Express Money Transfer" however, it was deleted by another user "RHaworth".
Please let me know what things do I need to remove/ change or edit. I am desperate now because I had made two articles and none of them were approved. Please I need you kind assistance. PLEASE!!!
( Your suraj ( talk) 03:59, 21 January 2019 (UTC))
Hey there! I saw you were a previous editor on this article, and I wanted to let you know I posted on the talk page. I was hoping to get some feedback about this proposal, and so I was not sure who else to notify. Seems there has been some meta-controversy that I only just now noticed, so I would like to avoid getting into that.
Many Thanks, ― Matthew J. Long -Talk- ☖ 20:26, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
This profile has been maliciously attacked by the user "BestTandoori" and we cannot have libelous information on Wiki. Although citations are present, they do not accurately reflect the content. For instance, certain terms utilized such as "lobbying" never happened nor did the public in figure in question ever say he was. Additionally, these users have strategically removed information that holistically also represent the overall contributions of this public figure, with intentional removals of positive accolades. I previously factually represented both the positive and negative when I first amended this profile. Malicious accounts like "BestTandoori" are solely made to instigate and vandalize this public figures character. I did not have time to fix them at this present moment. I will incorporate accurate and reliable citations with facts not opinions, but my efforts will be thwarted if they continue to be removed by accounts such as this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sigma58 ( talk • contribs) 23:30, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you I believe I turned on the twinkle. So all I have to do is add ˜˜~ or ˜˜˜~ ? Or will it automatically show up now as signed?
Thank you, I believed it constituted as vandalism " is the act of editing the project in a malicious manner that is intentionally disruptive. Vandalism includes the addition, removal, or modification of the text or other material that is either humorous, nonsensical, a hoax, or that is an offensive, humiliating, or otherwise degrading nature." The tags you mentioned are more specific. No conflict of interest exists, I have been editing many other pages, this just seems to be the only one that has such drastic changes. I hope you understand that when you spend a long time on something, to have someone change it with ill intent is in itself should be a conflict of interest, especially when that page was created to solely attack the profile of the public figure in question. I am spirited when it comes to these types of attacks because it goes against the reason I would like to become a good Wiki contributor. I will send an email to the public figure to let them know this is happening if it continues, just so they can deal with it, since it has taken so much of my time.
My goal is to be fair and holistic to everyone.
Thirdly, how do I create a page? I would like to create a page for the public figure Karen Wang from BC? I searched and it does not exist. I believe she is notable enough because she has been in the news so much and deserves a profile that fairly gives a holistic overview of her current endeavours. It says an admin needs to create one. Your assistance in ensuring I am creating one properly and following all guidelines would be appreciated. I intend to apply all of your feedback and thank you again for your time.
Here is a link that gives you an idea of the candidate I am referring to.
˜˜˜˜ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sigma58 ( talk • contribs) 16:00, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
References