This user is a student editor in Washington_University_in_St._Louis/Outcasts_and_Outlaws_-_The_History_of_Othering_in_Modern_Europe_(Spring_2024) . |
Hello, Jeorgiaobrien! Welcome to Wikipedia! It appears that you are here to participate in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia's
page for questions. You can also ask me by visiting
my user talk page and leaving a message, or you can ask your question on this page by editing it and placing {{
Help me}}
before your question. Please make sure that you
sign your messages on
discussion pages, which is done by entering four
tildes (~~~~) at the very end of it; this will automatically insert your username and the date. I also highly recommend that you review the
advice for students page.
Before you create an article, make sure that you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.
Your instructor or professor may wish to
set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one, please tell your instructor about creating one. It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{
Educational assignment}}
on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know that the article is a subject of an educational assignment as well as aid your communication with them.
Here are some more pages that you might find helpful:
While editing:
We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished!
~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 04:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Jeorgia!
I really liked the start to your article on George John Seaton. I thought you did a good job of synthesizing information from your sources and presenting it in a non-biased way. Most of my comments were related to small clarity issues or formatting (sorry if it sounds nitpicky!!). I know you still have some content to add, so I didn't want to focus on any gaps in information there, I know you have a good understanding of your topic!
Overall, it looks really good!
Margo.C.45 ( talk) 16:46, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
The article was well written and provides a lot of depth on the material that I was able to understand the history of the outcast. The sources are reliable and reflect the available literature on the outcast. The only thing I would say is that my comments were related to the format (such as adding images, links, and the references page). Overall, the article was effective and well structured. Sam.Herrera234 ( talk) 17:19, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Jeorgiaobrien, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
---|
|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) ( talk) 21:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to George John Seaton. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Velella Velella Talk 12:00, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George John Seaton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Velella Velella Talk 15:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
I am writing this here, rather than on the article talk page or the AfD page because I certainly don't want to make things any worse for you as a student Wikipedian. I appreciate that you have a done a great deal of work on your article, even though the first version appeared to have been written by a ChatBot, it wasn't was it?
I would hate for you to loose grades over this, but you are still not fixing the issues that need fixing.
It is at articles for deltion because it lacks notability. In this case it lacks several reliable sources discussing the subject. So discussions about his books don't count. They must be serious discussions about the topic of the article. Much of your version is a précis of the book contents, with excursions into Papillion etc.
To avoid the risk of your article being deleted you must find sources that discuss Seaton, not his books, but himself, the man Seaton. Those sources must be included in the text in relevant places. If any of your sources already do that, then include quotes from the source in the reference, or post the quotes on the tak page as evidence.
Having done that you must !Vote at the AfD saying something along the lines of: * Keep - New sources demonstrating notability and compliance with [[WP:GNG]] have now been added ~~~~
With luck that will be enough, but it does all depend on finding the sources.
I would also strongly advise consulting with you Wiki tutors and sharing everything, including this message, with them. Regards Velella Velella Talk 16:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
This user is a student editor in Washington_University_in_St._Louis/Outcasts_and_Outlaws_-_The_History_of_Othering_in_Modern_Europe_(Spring_2024) . |
Hello, Jeorgiaobrien! Welcome to Wikipedia! It appears that you are here to participate in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia's
page for questions. You can also ask me by visiting
my user talk page and leaving a message, or you can ask your question on this page by editing it and placing {{
Help me}}
before your question. Please make sure that you
sign your messages on
discussion pages, which is done by entering four
tildes (~~~~) at the very end of it; this will automatically insert your username and the date. I also highly recommend that you review the
advice for students page.
Before you create an article, make sure that you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.
Your instructor or professor may wish to
set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one, please tell your instructor about creating one. It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{
Educational assignment}}
on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know that the article is a subject of an educational assignment as well as aid your communication with them.
Here are some more pages that you might find helpful:
While editing:
We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished!
~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 04:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Jeorgia!
I really liked the start to your article on George John Seaton. I thought you did a good job of synthesizing information from your sources and presenting it in a non-biased way. Most of my comments were related to small clarity issues or formatting (sorry if it sounds nitpicky!!). I know you still have some content to add, so I didn't want to focus on any gaps in information there, I know you have a good understanding of your topic!
Overall, it looks really good!
Margo.C.45 ( talk) 16:46, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
The article was well written and provides a lot of depth on the material that I was able to understand the history of the outcast. The sources are reliable and reflect the available literature on the outcast. The only thing I would say is that my comments were related to the format (such as adding images, links, and the references page). Overall, the article was effective and well structured. Sam.Herrera234 ( talk) 17:19, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Jeorgiaobrien, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
---|
|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) ( talk) 21:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to George John Seaton. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Velella Velella Talk 12:00, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George John Seaton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Velella Velella Talk 15:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
I am writing this here, rather than on the article talk page or the AfD page because I certainly don't want to make things any worse for you as a student Wikipedian. I appreciate that you have a done a great deal of work on your article, even though the first version appeared to have been written by a ChatBot, it wasn't was it?
I would hate for you to loose grades over this, but you are still not fixing the issues that need fixing.
It is at articles for deltion because it lacks notability. In this case it lacks several reliable sources discussing the subject. So discussions about his books don't count. They must be serious discussions about the topic of the article. Much of your version is a précis of the book contents, with excursions into Papillion etc.
To avoid the risk of your article being deleted you must find sources that discuss Seaton, not his books, but himself, the man Seaton. Those sources must be included in the text in relevant places. If any of your sources already do that, then include quotes from the source in the reference, or post the quotes on the tak page as evidence.
Having done that you must !Vote at the AfD saying something along the lines of: * Keep - New sources demonstrating notability and compliance with [[WP:GNG]] have now been added ~~~~
With luck that will be enough, but it does all depend on finding the sources.
I would also strongly advise consulting with you Wiki tutors and sharing everything, including this message, with them. Regards Velella Velella Talk 16:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)