This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello. This is an automated message to tell you that, as it stands, you wil shortly be mentioned in this week's 'Arbitration Report' ( link). The report aims to inform The Signpost's many readers about the activities of the Arbitration Committee in a non-partisan manner. Please review the article, and, if you have any concerns, feel free to leave them in the Comments section directly below the main body of text, where they will be reader by the editorial team. Please only edit the article yourself in the case of grievious factual errors, as well as refrain from edit-warring or other uncivil behaviour within the comments section. Thank you. On behalf of The Signpost's editorial team, LivingBot ( talk) 20:48, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

An arbitration case regarding the conduct of User:Cirt and User:Jayen466 has been closed and may be viewed at the link above. The following is a summary of enacted remedies:

1. Cirt is topic-banned indefinitely from making any edits to articles related to new religious movements, their adherents, and any related biographies of living people, broadly construed.
2. Cirt is further restricted on biographies of living people if the articles are substantially about, or Cirt's edits introduce material relating to: politics, religion, or social controversy. Cirt is permitted to edit articles incidentally related to such topics provided the articles, and Cirt's edits, are not biographical in nature. The Committee may extend this restriction if BLP-related problems continue, and Cirt may request relaxation of this restriction after one year from this date if there are no further problems.
3. Cirt is desysopped for admitted violations of the neutral point of view and biographies of living people policies. He may reapply for adminship through requests for adminship at any time.
4. Jayen466 is reminded to strictly adhere to dispute resolution processes in any future disputes.
5. Cirt and Jayen466 are subject to an interaction restriction wherein they may not communicate with each other, nor comment on each other, or each other's actions or edits, directly or indirectly, anywhere on Wikipedia. Comments on the same page are permissible provided the previously mentioned restrictions are upheld. Neither party may respond directly to any violations of this or any other remedy, but shall report any violations via email directly to the Arbitration Committee.
6. Any violation of these restrictions may be enforced by block, to be logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Cirt and Jayen466#Log of blocks, bans, and restrictions.

For the Arbitration Committee, Hersfold ^{( t/ a/ c)} 00:30, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thanks for taking lumps so that some iota of rationality could be brought to the convoluted, broken and corrupted system that is Wikipedia. Njsustain ( talk) 00:56, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, Njsustain. All the best, -- J N 466 00:59, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the nicest barnstar ever! :) SarahStierch ( talk) 13:03, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Glad you like. It seemed to be the most appropriate one. :) -- J N 466 16:12, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Do you know how I might have my minor edit permanently reverted and deleted from the Scientology history? I believe I was a little bit off topic and harmfully disruptive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratiuglink ( talk • contribs) 13:15, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. You could post to WP:AN and ask an admin to rev-delete the edit. I don't think that the edit was a big deal though; many such edits have been made over the years, and rev-deletions or WP:Oversight are usually reserved for more serious issues. I wouldn't worry about it. :) But the choice is of course yours. Cheers, -- J N 466 19:52, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

I'm actually rather unfamiliar with Wikipedia and have other matters that I must attend to. Is it possible that you could look into this matter for me, or divulge to me the screen name of an admin? 15:53, 24 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratiuglink ( talk • contribs)

If you feel strongly about it, you could ask User:SilkTork if he would be prepared to do the rev-delete for you. Best, -- J N 466 16:37, 24 September 2011 (UTC)