This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi J,

A friend just found this link: Society for Understanding of Fundamental Ideas (a la Shah's original "twee" acronym). http://www.societyforunderstanding.co.uk/

Thought you might be interested. WHOIS says Registrant is an Oliver Schindler, London.

Cheers, eric. Esowteric+ Talk 09:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, Eric. :) -- J N 466 22:30, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

If it's another hoax, don't mention my name.

Some discussion at: W.O.R.K. group @ Facebook

Esowteric+ Talk 09:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

-- J N 466 19:32, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi Jayen466! I have seen that you have contributed to the article about designer Kelly Wearstler. I wanted to let you know that I have started a conversation about the use of the 2008 Domino magazine cover in the article. It was removed under non-free content criteria reason #8 (that it has no contextual significance) and perhaps you'd like to comment on the talk page. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch ( talk) 13:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

It seems to me there is some contextual significance, but these questions can be really tricky. I've dropped User:Moonriddengirl a note; she knows her way around copyright and its implications better than most around here. Best, -- J N 466 19:31, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of new religious movements BigJim707 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:29, 18 October 2011 (UTC).

The Barnstar of Diplomacy

Jayen466 remained completely unbiased and mature about my Wikipedia article. So many members of Wikipedia, wanted to post tabloid information without even researching accurate information. Its individuals like Jayen466 that makes Wikipedia a reliable and trustworthy source for anyone that needs to find facts. Again, thank you for helping me on what I thought was an uphill battle on the web. All admins need to monitor critical information on Wikipedia. Since, so many children/people turn to Wikipedia to learn. Crackofdawn ( talk) 05:30, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, Crackofdawn! All the best, -- J N 466 15:39, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar and kind words. Cla68 ( talk) 17:15, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

I liked the way you framed things on the controversial images issue at ArbCom. When the request is denied (as seems likely) I will be thinking about creating a policy RfC - that seems to be the tenor of many of the committee responses - and I could use help drafting it. if you're interested, let me know. -- Ludwigs2 20:38, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

I don't think your (Jayen466's) idea of requiring that images come from reputable sources will work: its consequence would be that Wikipedia contains hardly any images. Images in reputable published sources are almost always copyrighted in a way that does not permit us to use them. Looie496 ( talk) 15:54, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Of course we cannot use the exact same images as our sources, and I would not advocate that. But our general approach and style of illustration should be fully in line with that used in reputable sources. -- J N 466 15:58, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Jayen466/Archives/2011/October! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey