This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A GA Review of Organ transplantation in the People's Republic of China is taking place, and the question of splitting out the section Organ transplantation in the People's Republic of China#Falun Gong allegations: 2006 into a standalone article has been raised. This will be a controversial move as there are people who have objected to the allegation and corresponding report being a standalone article, and have insisted on merging it back into Organ transplantation in the People's Republic of China. I support the content being moved into a standalone article, with a summary left behind, as currently this one allegation dominates the article. Added to which the allegation and the report have gained enough media attention to meet notability guidelines. My proposal is to create the article Kilgour-Matas report, leaving a summary behind, and to immediately open a discussion on WP:AfD regarding the notability of the topic. The version I would use is this one, and to update it with pertinent amendments made to Organ transplantation in the People's Republic of China, using the images that are in that article. Your comments, suggestions, and involvement in this is welcomed and encouraged. SilkTork * YES! 14:52, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know I appreciate your defense of me at the CC arb case, on the PD page. Thanks for your efforts. ATren ( talk) 02:13, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
The Human Sexuality Barnstar | ||
Nice work on the Creampie article. Cptnono ( talk) 01:20, 5 October 2010 (UTC) |
A long time ago you were part of the discussion on the WP:BELIEFS proposal. I went away for a while and I am trying to come back slowly, so I thought I would start with updating that page and reactivating the conversation. Please join in if you still would like to be part of that discussion. Low Sea ( talk) 20:20, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Actually when you removed your question about sources I was researching a reply. The short answer is that this is a claim that he has repeated in his articles and speeches for several years now and this can be confirmed from his own writings as published in prominent newspapers.
A longer reply will have to wait until I have access to a more powerful communications device than this telephone. Tasty monster (= TS ) 17:09, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Let's start with organising the text into 3 concise paragraphs. The proposal 5 needs to be reorganised like prop 7. Prop 5 doesn't flow well. QuackGuru ( talk) 19:56, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. FYI [1] The relevant part is in the 2nd paragraph.
Regards, -- Bob K31416 ( talk) 20:10, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Hope you don't mind that I made a small formatting adjustment to your post here. Dreadstar ☥ 00:46, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi, you removed {{ wikileaks cat}} from Scientology. [2] I'd like to know your reasoning for this, and also alert you to Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion#Template:Wikileaks. -- John Vandenberg ( chat) 21:51, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A GA Review of Organ transplantation in the People's Republic of China is taking place, and the question of splitting out the section Organ transplantation in the People's Republic of China#Falun Gong allegations: 2006 into a standalone article has been raised. This will be a controversial move as there are people who have objected to the allegation and corresponding report being a standalone article, and have insisted on merging it back into Organ transplantation in the People's Republic of China. I support the content being moved into a standalone article, with a summary left behind, as currently this one allegation dominates the article. Added to which the allegation and the report have gained enough media attention to meet notability guidelines. My proposal is to create the article Kilgour-Matas report, leaving a summary behind, and to immediately open a discussion on WP:AfD regarding the notability of the topic. The version I would use is this one, and to update it with pertinent amendments made to Organ transplantation in the People's Republic of China, using the images that are in that article. Your comments, suggestions, and involvement in this is welcomed and encouraged. SilkTork * YES! 14:52, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know I appreciate your defense of me at the CC arb case, on the PD page. Thanks for your efforts. ATren ( talk) 02:13, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
The Human Sexuality Barnstar | ||
Nice work on the Creampie article. Cptnono ( talk) 01:20, 5 October 2010 (UTC) |
A long time ago you were part of the discussion on the WP:BELIEFS proposal. I went away for a while and I am trying to come back slowly, so I thought I would start with updating that page and reactivating the conversation. Please join in if you still would like to be part of that discussion. Low Sea ( talk) 20:20, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Actually when you removed your question about sources I was researching a reply. The short answer is that this is a claim that he has repeated in his articles and speeches for several years now and this can be confirmed from his own writings as published in prominent newspapers.
A longer reply will have to wait until I have access to a more powerful communications device than this telephone. Tasty monster (= TS ) 17:09, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Let's start with organising the text into 3 concise paragraphs. The proposal 5 needs to be reorganised like prop 7. Prop 5 doesn't flow well. QuackGuru ( talk) 19:56, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. FYI [1] The relevant part is in the 2nd paragraph.
Regards, -- Bob K31416 ( talk) 20:10, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Hope you don't mind that I made a small formatting adjustment to your post here. Dreadstar ☥ 00:46, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi, you removed {{ wikileaks cat}} from Scientology. [2] I'd like to know your reasoning for this, and also alert you to Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion#Template:Wikileaks. -- John Vandenberg ( chat) 21:51, 26 October 2010 (UTC)