A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allen Henson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Henson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram ( talk) 09:49, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Stop disrupting the AfD please. An uninvolved editor will close the deletion discussion after 7 days (normally), judging the comments from uninvolved editors about the article. Archiving the AfD or otherwise continuing to disrupt the discussion will only result in getting you blocked, which won't help the article one bit. Fram ( talk) 12:06, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Right, but you are trolling and not responding to any of my comments. Please see the two books published... That enough should end this discussion, quit acting like a child that needs to wait for the grown-ups. This is a frivoulous AFD please close it.
A discussion at the administrator's noticeboard concerning your edits has started. You are invited to comment there: WP:ANI#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Henson. Fram ( talk) 12:39, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
There'sNoTime (
to explain) 12:39, 4 July 2017 (UTC)Hello Jaledel, and welcome to Wikipedia. Some of your additions to Nora Lustig and Allen Henson have been removed, as you appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 20:12, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
The article Commitment to Equity Institute has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
no evidence foe notability of this small institute
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
DGG (
talk ) 07:39, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Fut.Perf.
☼ 08:25, 5 July 2017 (UTC)A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Commitment to Equity Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commitment to Equity Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pinkbeast ( talk) 18:18, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Xifeng Wu. Zanhe ( talk) 21:40, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. -- Zanhe ( talk) 22:49, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. El_C 22:51, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allen Henson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Henson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram ( talk) 09:49, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Stop disrupting the AfD please. An uninvolved editor will close the deletion discussion after 7 days (normally), judging the comments from uninvolved editors about the article. Archiving the AfD or otherwise continuing to disrupt the discussion will only result in getting you blocked, which won't help the article one bit. Fram ( talk) 12:06, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Right, but you are trolling and not responding to any of my comments. Please see the two books published... That enough should end this discussion, quit acting like a child that needs to wait for the grown-ups. This is a frivoulous AFD please close it.
A discussion at the administrator's noticeboard concerning your edits has started. You are invited to comment there: WP:ANI#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Henson. Fram ( talk) 12:39, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
There'sNoTime (
to explain) 12:39, 4 July 2017 (UTC)Hello Jaledel, and welcome to Wikipedia. Some of your additions to Nora Lustig and Allen Henson have been removed, as you appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 20:12, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
The article Commitment to Equity Institute has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
no evidence foe notability of this small institute
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
DGG (
talk ) 07:39, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Fut.Perf.
☼ 08:25, 5 July 2017 (UTC)A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Commitment to Equity Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commitment to Equity Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pinkbeast ( talk) 18:18, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Xifeng Wu. Zanhe ( talk) 21:40, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. -- Zanhe ( talk) 22:49, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. El_C 22:51, 17 June 2019 (UTC)