This is Indiafriend's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Indiafriend ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I do not understand how I can be blocked for 'alleged' sockpuppetry. There was no checkuser investigation, there was no notification, and there is no evidence. Also, I do not understand how a few edit on a specific page justifies permission to block someone. Kww blocked me for doing research on a singer and expanding the article, and he is using sockpuppetry to justify this block. * Update. If it helps, this is my IP address "199.103.63.174".
Decline reason:
Based on behavioral evidence, it is quite clear you are Soccermeko. Thanks for stopping by again. If you would like to be unblocked, log in as Soccermeko and request an unblock there. Jayron 32 02:04, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Indiafriend ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I do not understand how I can be blocked for 'alleged' sockpuppetry. There was no checkuser investigation, there was no notification, and there is no evidence. Also, I do not understand how a few edits on a specific page justifies permission to block someone. Kww blocked me for doing research on a singer and expanding the article, and he is using sockpuppetry to justify this block. * Update. If it helps, this is my IP address "199.103.63.174". I would also like my case reviewed by someone other than Kww, Jayron32, or their peers. Their reviews are a pure conflict of interest. Kww and Jayron32 work together to validate my block. Still, there is no evidence linking myself to another editor.
Decline reason:
I have made an independent assessment, and it is abundantly clear that this account is a sockpuppet. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 09:05, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Due to shenanigans with denied unblock notices ( here and here), I've removed Indiafriend's talk page access. Any admin that chooses to enter into a dialogue with him will need to restore talk page access.— Kww( talk) 15:27, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
As a further note, the IP address he mentions above (199.103.63.174) isn't an end-user IP address: it's a webhost from Cirrus Tech Hosting that would allow a user anywhere in the world to appear to be from Toronto. I've blocked 199.103.56.0/21 from editing due to it being a webhost IP range.— Kww( talk) 20:45, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
This is Indiafriend's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Indiafriend ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I do not understand how I can be blocked for 'alleged' sockpuppetry. There was no checkuser investigation, there was no notification, and there is no evidence. Also, I do not understand how a few edit on a specific page justifies permission to block someone. Kww blocked me for doing research on a singer and expanding the article, and he is using sockpuppetry to justify this block. * Update. If it helps, this is my IP address "199.103.63.174".
Decline reason:
Based on behavioral evidence, it is quite clear you are Soccermeko. Thanks for stopping by again. If you would like to be unblocked, log in as Soccermeko and request an unblock there. Jayron 32 02:04, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Indiafriend ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I do not understand how I can be blocked for 'alleged' sockpuppetry. There was no checkuser investigation, there was no notification, and there is no evidence. Also, I do not understand how a few edits on a specific page justifies permission to block someone. Kww blocked me for doing research on a singer and expanding the article, and he is using sockpuppetry to justify this block. * Update. If it helps, this is my IP address "199.103.63.174". I would also like my case reviewed by someone other than Kww, Jayron32, or their peers. Their reviews are a pure conflict of interest. Kww and Jayron32 work together to validate my block. Still, there is no evidence linking myself to another editor.
Decline reason:
I have made an independent assessment, and it is abundantly clear that this account is a sockpuppet. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 09:05, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Due to shenanigans with denied unblock notices ( here and here), I've removed Indiafriend's talk page access. Any admin that chooses to enter into a dialogue with him will need to restore talk page access.— Kww( talk) 15:27, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
As a further note, the IP address he mentions above (199.103.63.174) isn't an end-user IP address: it's a webhost from Cirrus Tech Hosting that would allow a user anywhere in the world to appear to be from Toronto. I've blocked 199.103.56.0/21 from editing due to it being a webhost IP range.— Kww( talk) 20:45, 20 April 2014 (UTC)