Severe |
High |
Elevated |
Guarded |
Low |
Talk Archives
SandBox
My Mentoring
OK Igor, how you have to wash the dishes and polish all the mirrors. :) To paraphrase the off-line communication I've just sent you, please spend the next two days just proposing edits in your sandbox snd thinking about where you want to go here. You should feel free to email me for any private concerns, but most stuff should probably happen here on this page. You already have some ideas about where to look for gnomish work and it looks like that's where you'd prefer to start.
Once we both feel good about the plan, we can start with getting you editing and ask for the "provisional" part of the unblock to be dropped. Franamax ( talk) 10:20, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Franamax, please forgive me for barging in. Igor, do you know how to cite a reliable source? Do you understand that that en.Wikipedia articles are not about truth, but about verifiability? Gwen Gale ( talk) 11:33, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
haha, you make feel right at home! Thanks guys. I did not realize I have so many friends on Wikipedia! ;-) Igor Berger ( talk) 14:35, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Editing in my sandbox, per AN decision
Editing Oden_(icebreaker) article. Please check User:Igorberger/Sandbox 21:43, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi Igorberger, the terms of your unblock are generally described here. They include working in your sandbox (for "xx" days, which weren't specified by the unblocking admin), and reaching a satisfactory agreement with myself. I would propose the following:
If you will agree to these, I'll agree that you are free to edit generally. I'll post to AN to confirm such if you wish. I'll continue to monitor (and change) your edits and offer my advice, which I hope you will consider. I would also expect that you would check with me when you're unsure of how to proceed or when others are raising concerns, for four months or so, or until I tell you it's no longer necessary.
I'd prefer to bat around the Oden article a little more in your sandbox, but it's your choice.
I think that these terms will let you gain some good experience in article-building in uncontroversial areas, which is what we all want. Any and all of the above are of course subject to the judgment of the unblocking and any other reviewing admins. Franamax ( talk) 13:17, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Do you or have you had another account here at Wikipedia? Tiamut talk 17:26, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Please assume good faith Continue discussion on the article's talk page where it was started Talk:Hummus#Dispute_Levant_as_Arab. Thank you, Igor Berger ( talk) 17:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Igorberger, you should bring issues like this up on the article talk page first. You'd previously mentioned to me your worries that you would bring a strong POV to certain areas. Now it seems that you may be doing just that. Remember how I advised you to just say your piece and be done with it? Instead, it looks like you have 4 or 5 editors opposing you and none supporting. That's a really good indication that it may be time to get back to work on the good ship Oden. Franamax ( talk) 00:29, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
(Fourple e/c)
(e/c) Hummus article dispute discussion on my mentor User:Franamax/Igorberger page discussion on User:Franamax/Igorberger#Hummus_article_dispute Igor Berger ( talk) 12:36, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
A grass roots activism campaign organized by JIDF to bring awareness to an Israeli soldier kept as a hostage by Hamas Islamic terrorist organization. After 3 years in captivity in a Gaza jail, unable to see his parents or receive visits by Red Cross as granted to him under the prisoner rights of Geneva convention, Gilad Shalit is not forgotten by the world's Jewish community and others. Jewish organization from all sides of life, political and religious are joining in the campaign to alert the world of Gilad Shalit's Hamas Human Rights violations The Israeli consultant of New York, Chabad house, International Civil Liberties Alliance, J.U.F., and Dr. Hagit Hadar of the Gilad Shalit Committee in America are just some of the people and organizations joining the campaign. [1] [2] [3] [4]. The messages will go out on Tweeter on August 26 2009 Igor Berger ( talk) 01:12, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
(etc) Campaign To Free Gilad Shalit - Europe News article. Notes JIDF Tweet4Shalit activism campaign. Igor Berger ( talk) 08:10, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
(outdent) The Jewish Week article WEB EXCLUSIVE: Tweeting For Shalit Igor Berger ( talk) 17:35, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
This user made an attempt to insert section about pro-Shalit activity in Twitter. Although it was quickly reverted for number of reasons, the information deserves a sentence or two in Gilad Shalit#Israeli society perceptions and activities related to Gilad Shalit. I suggest relevant info be put into the discussion page, I'd appreciate if those would be only Reliable sources or at least notable ones. Seeing that you have a mentor or somebody, I'll leave him a note too. -- Sceptic from Ashdod ( talk) 12:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
First Hummus and now Gilad Shalit? You've been allowed back only within many bounds, yet you seem to be heading straight to the most edgy, controversial topics you can think of. You haven't shown you can be trusted to edit articles like those. If you make another edit to any Palestine-Israel topic without getting an ok from your mentor first, or otherwise breach your mentoring agreements, you'll be blocked from editing indefinitely. Gwen Gale ( talk) 12:07, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
(outdent) Sean, I am open minded and come in Peace not War. The next Israeli related edit I will try to do with Franamax. But at the same time, you should consider the edits that I tried to do on articles Hummus and Gilad Shalit/ Annulling these edits is not friendly! How about trying to implement them into the articles? Igor Berger ( talk) 09:14, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
(outdent) The Three Bears I would like to know why are you WP:wikistalking me? Every edit you have made from WP:SPA is with reference to me Special:Contributions/The_Three_Bears I request WP:CheckUser here WP:RFCU on The Three Bears. Thank you, Igor Berger ( talk) 11:04, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
I'm shocked that people would question why a person who gravitate towards his knowledge specialty. the only conclusion I can come to is that there is bias here and bigotry in the attacks on Igor Berger —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simonstudio ( talk • contribs) 17:41, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
None of this (except Gwen's warning and maybe The Three Bears' first few posts) is particularly helpful to getting Igorberger back on track, so please, can it all end now? Simonstudio, your comment is noted, as well as the apparently matching comment at Igor's and your blogs. You should closely read WP:MEAT, because you are not helping Igor at all. Franamax ( talk) 23:03, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Your addition looks great. Wizzy… ☎ 19:40, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi Igor, Since you unblock was based on your having a suitable mentor and your mentor has resigned because they are unhappy with your compliance with the mentorship, I have reblocked you until such time as a suitable mentor can be made available to you. Best wishes Spartaz
Hi, I am willing to be a mentor for a while if you want. Take a few days off. If you come back with a few topics that you would like to work on, and I believe that they are non-controversial, I'll unblock provided you only work on the nominated topics. If we can work through a few non-controversial topics, we can tackle a controversial one if I can find a domain specialist to assist. John Vandenberg ( chat) 10:00, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
I just found out my grandfather Fromchenko Leonid Isaacovich last name was Levin, but changed to Fromchenko to escape Russian Pogroms. My Grandfather's brother Eliyahu Fromenchenko founded Elite chocolate in Ramat Gan. [7] Igor Berger ( talk) 00:18, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
I spoke to my father's brother and he told me I am a Levi. I am from a Levi tribe. I am an Ashkenazi Jew Igor Berger ( talk) 00:58, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Elite chocolate is nothing more than chocolate from Laima chocolate factory [8] in Latvia Riga. [9] Please fix Strauss (company) to reflect the correct name and information! Igor Berger ( talk) 01:35, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi, my unblock proposal is that you agree to only work on articles that I approve here on your talk page.
The initial list of article is:
you can edit the talk pages, and chat with other people on their talk pages about these articles, but you cant join wikiprojects or unrelated discussions.
We can add other articles as your research progresses, and we will remove the other restrictions depending on how well you edit the approved articles.
Do you accept? -- John Vandenberg ( chat) 02:57, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
The Moshevitz family, one of the founders of chocolate maker Elite, have notified Michael Strauss their support of his take-over attempt/ Igor Berger ( talk) 08:35, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
As a Levite I must rebuild the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem and worship God there. Baruch Hashem, Amein Igor Berger ( talk) 03:32, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
This user is a member of WikiProject Wikipedia dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of itself. |
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/userbox/UserWikiProjectWikipedia}}
Pandelver ( talk) 15:35, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.
You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:27, 30 October 2011 (UTC).
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.
In this issue:
--The Olive Branch 19:08, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you've had previous contact with user "Frederico1234" & first am wonder if you can recall whether he's a biased or reasonable editor? From your conversation with him on his user-talk page, It seems you were saying he's a pro-Palestinian editor in 2009?
I just had occasion to write the following to him in a RfC, regarding his (unfounded/not factually supported) critique of Dr. Mitchell Bard's JewishVirtualLibrary as factually "unreliable": "Frederico, do you have reasons why [JVL] would violate WP:RS, or is this simply " Wikipedia:I_just_don't_like_it"? Many websites cited in this article --and in WP overall-- are "propaganda" sites; that, alone, does not violate WP:RS (per section 4.7 of WP:RS)." (Note that JVL is being cited for the pro-Israel side in the writing-style of "The proponents hold that...XYZ, and their opposition holds that...ABC" -- we are NOT claiming it's a neutral source but WP:RS section 4.7 allows for this.)
Please also drop by if you have time & give your own opinion about this source's conformance to WP:RS: [ here] ~JH Robbins — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.48.252.105 ( talk) 23:32, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi Igorberger,
I saw your name on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Discrimination#Participants listing.
There is a discussion at Template talk:Infobox person#Citizenship suggesting a change of emphasis to a Citizenship entry from the Nationality entry.
The idea is to give more facilitation to Patriotism instead of Nationalism and also to allow more freedom of expression in regards to terminologies used.
Contributions are welcomed but may be worth checking last edit to check progress first :) Regards Gregkaye ( talk) 20:53, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello Igorberger,
I would just like to inquire on your status on WikiProject Computer Security as the list of WikiProject Computer Security/Members is going to be improved to list active and inactive users.
This is update is being done according to a request for comments on the WikiProject Computer Security talk page. Be sure to state your status at the User status section in the WikiProject Computer Security talk page before the end of four weeks as this will state your status as inactive in the project if not done before then.
FockeWulf FW 190 ( talk) 19:19, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 04:51, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello. I wanted to let you know that Fixuture reinstated an extremely cherry-picking POV paragraph that was rejected in February, despite there was no consensus for it, not then, not recently.-- Tribal Defender ( talk) 03:40, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
If you want to discuss The Exodus article, discuss it at Talk:The Exodus. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 16:49, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
I == I can't find any evidence your mentorship agreement, through which you escaped a ban, is rescinded ==
I'm referring to this and have asked User:John Vandenberg to comment. Meanwhile it appears to me that you are restricted to a small set of articles not including the ones you are editing. You don't know me but you can click on my userpage for more information. At the moment I'm assuming it hasn't been voided by time and is still in force. Doug Weller talk 17:25, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
The agreement dates to 2009 and User:Igorberger was mostly inactive for several years. I checked his edit history, and he only returned to Wiki-editing on 19 April, 2017. Most of his edits so far are comments on talk pages and discussions with User:Malik Shabazz. I am a bit puzzled that he does not seem to remember how to use Hyperlinks, but I guess he is a bit rusty. Dimadick ( talk) 18:05, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Doug Weller talk 19:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Igor, despite the passage of time I don't see an improvement in your editing and you are still subject to restrictions to editing. You are not complying with that restriction. The IP area does not need furthjer distructive editing and until we can be confident that you have improved you should not make any edits related to it. In face, i suggest you cease editing altogether until we work out what we are going to do. Spartaz Humbug! 05:46, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
{{db-Igorberger}}
The file File:Igorberger.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:01, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Severe |
High |
Elevated |
Guarded |
Low |
Talk Archives
SandBox
My Mentoring
OK Igor, how you have to wash the dishes and polish all the mirrors. :) To paraphrase the off-line communication I've just sent you, please spend the next two days just proposing edits in your sandbox snd thinking about where you want to go here. You should feel free to email me for any private concerns, but most stuff should probably happen here on this page. You already have some ideas about where to look for gnomish work and it looks like that's where you'd prefer to start.
Once we both feel good about the plan, we can start with getting you editing and ask for the "provisional" part of the unblock to be dropped. Franamax ( talk) 10:20, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Franamax, please forgive me for barging in. Igor, do you know how to cite a reliable source? Do you understand that that en.Wikipedia articles are not about truth, but about verifiability? Gwen Gale ( talk) 11:33, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
haha, you make feel right at home! Thanks guys. I did not realize I have so many friends on Wikipedia! ;-) Igor Berger ( talk) 14:35, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Editing in my sandbox, per AN decision
Editing Oden_(icebreaker) article. Please check User:Igorberger/Sandbox 21:43, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi Igorberger, the terms of your unblock are generally described here. They include working in your sandbox (for "xx" days, which weren't specified by the unblocking admin), and reaching a satisfactory agreement with myself. I would propose the following:
If you will agree to these, I'll agree that you are free to edit generally. I'll post to AN to confirm such if you wish. I'll continue to monitor (and change) your edits and offer my advice, which I hope you will consider. I would also expect that you would check with me when you're unsure of how to proceed or when others are raising concerns, for four months or so, or until I tell you it's no longer necessary.
I'd prefer to bat around the Oden article a little more in your sandbox, but it's your choice.
I think that these terms will let you gain some good experience in article-building in uncontroversial areas, which is what we all want. Any and all of the above are of course subject to the judgment of the unblocking and any other reviewing admins. Franamax ( talk) 13:17, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Do you or have you had another account here at Wikipedia? Tiamut talk 17:26, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Please assume good faith Continue discussion on the article's talk page where it was started Talk:Hummus#Dispute_Levant_as_Arab. Thank you, Igor Berger ( talk) 17:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Igorberger, you should bring issues like this up on the article talk page first. You'd previously mentioned to me your worries that you would bring a strong POV to certain areas. Now it seems that you may be doing just that. Remember how I advised you to just say your piece and be done with it? Instead, it looks like you have 4 or 5 editors opposing you and none supporting. That's a really good indication that it may be time to get back to work on the good ship Oden. Franamax ( talk) 00:29, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
(Fourple e/c)
(e/c) Hummus article dispute discussion on my mentor User:Franamax/Igorberger page discussion on User:Franamax/Igorberger#Hummus_article_dispute Igor Berger ( talk) 12:36, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
A grass roots activism campaign organized by JIDF to bring awareness to an Israeli soldier kept as a hostage by Hamas Islamic terrorist organization. After 3 years in captivity in a Gaza jail, unable to see his parents or receive visits by Red Cross as granted to him under the prisoner rights of Geneva convention, Gilad Shalit is not forgotten by the world's Jewish community and others. Jewish organization from all sides of life, political and religious are joining in the campaign to alert the world of Gilad Shalit's Hamas Human Rights violations The Israeli consultant of New York, Chabad house, International Civil Liberties Alliance, J.U.F., and Dr. Hagit Hadar of the Gilad Shalit Committee in America are just some of the people and organizations joining the campaign. [1] [2] [3] [4]. The messages will go out on Tweeter on August 26 2009 Igor Berger ( talk) 01:12, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
(etc) Campaign To Free Gilad Shalit - Europe News article. Notes JIDF Tweet4Shalit activism campaign. Igor Berger ( talk) 08:10, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
(outdent) The Jewish Week article WEB EXCLUSIVE: Tweeting For Shalit Igor Berger ( talk) 17:35, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
This user made an attempt to insert section about pro-Shalit activity in Twitter. Although it was quickly reverted for number of reasons, the information deserves a sentence or two in Gilad Shalit#Israeli society perceptions and activities related to Gilad Shalit. I suggest relevant info be put into the discussion page, I'd appreciate if those would be only Reliable sources or at least notable ones. Seeing that you have a mentor or somebody, I'll leave him a note too. -- Sceptic from Ashdod ( talk) 12:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
First Hummus and now Gilad Shalit? You've been allowed back only within many bounds, yet you seem to be heading straight to the most edgy, controversial topics you can think of. You haven't shown you can be trusted to edit articles like those. If you make another edit to any Palestine-Israel topic without getting an ok from your mentor first, or otherwise breach your mentoring agreements, you'll be blocked from editing indefinitely. Gwen Gale ( talk) 12:07, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
(outdent) Sean, I am open minded and come in Peace not War. The next Israeli related edit I will try to do with Franamax. But at the same time, you should consider the edits that I tried to do on articles Hummus and Gilad Shalit/ Annulling these edits is not friendly! How about trying to implement them into the articles? Igor Berger ( talk) 09:14, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
(outdent) The Three Bears I would like to know why are you WP:wikistalking me? Every edit you have made from WP:SPA is with reference to me Special:Contributions/The_Three_Bears I request WP:CheckUser here WP:RFCU on The Three Bears. Thank you, Igor Berger ( talk) 11:04, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
I'm shocked that people would question why a person who gravitate towards his knowledge specialty. the only conclusion I can come to is that there is bias here and bigotry in the attacks on Igor Berger —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simonstudio ( talk • contribs) 17:41, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
None of this (except Gwen's warning and maybe The Three Bears' first few posts) is particularly helpful to getting Igorberger back on track, so please, can it all end now? Simonstudio, your comment is noted, as well as the apparently matching comment at Igor's and your blogs. You should closely read WP:MEAT, because you are not helping Igor at all. Franamax ( talk) 23:03, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Your addition looks great. Wizzy… ☎ 19:40, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi Igor, Since you unblock was based on your having a suitable mentor and your mentor has resigned because they are unhappy with your compliance with the mentorship, I have reblocked you until such time as a suitable mentor can be made available to you. Best wishes Spartaz
Hi, I am willing to be a mentor for a while if you want. Take a few days off. If you come back with a few topics that you would like to work on, and I believe that they are non-controversial, I'll unblock provided you only work on the nominated topics. If we can work through a few non-controversial topics, we can tackle a controversial one if I can find a domain specialist to assist. John Vandenberg ( chat) 10:00, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
I just found out my grandfather Fromchenko Leonid Isaacovich last name was Levin, but changed to Fromchenko to escape Russian Pogroms. My Grandfather's brother Eliyahu Fromenchenko founded Elite chocolate in Ramat Gan. [7] Igor Berger ( talk) 00:18, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
I spoke to my father's brother and he told me I am a Levi. I am from a Levi tribe. I am an Ashkenazi Jew Igor Berger ( talk) 00:58, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Elite chocolate is nothing more than chocolate from Laima chocolate factory [8] in Latvia Riga. [9] Please fix Strauss (company) to reflect the correct name and information! Igor Berger ( talk) 01:35, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi, my unblock proposal is that you agree to only work on articles that I approve here on your talk page.
The initial list of article is:
you can edit the talk pages, and chat with other people on their talk pages about these articles, but you cant join wikiprojects or unrelated discussions.
We can add other articles as your research progresses, and we will remove the other restrictions depending on how well you edit the approved articles.
Do you accept? -- John Vandenberg ( chat) 02:57, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
The Moshevitz family, one of the founders of chocolate maker Elite, have notified Michael Strauss their support of his take-over attempt/ Igor Berger ( talk) 08:35, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
As a Levite I must rebuild the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem and worship God there. Baruch Hashem, Amein Igor Berger ( talk) 03:32, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
This user is a member of WikiProject Wikipedia dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of itself. |
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/userbox/UserWikiProjectWikipedia}}
Pandelver ( talk) 15:35, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.
You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:27, 30 October 2011 (UTC).
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.
In this issue:
--The Olive Branch 19:08, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you've had previous contact with user "Frederico1234" & first am wonder if you can recall whether he's a biased or reasonable editor? From your conversation with him on his user-talk page, It seems you were saying he's a pro-Palestinian editor in 2009?
I just had occasion to write the following to him in a RfC, regarding his (unfounded/not factually supported) critique of Dr. Mitchell Bard's JewishVirtualLibrary as factually "unreliable": "Frederico, do you have reasons why [JVL] would violate WP:RS, or is this simply " Wikipedia:I_just_don't_like_it"? Many websites cited in this article --and in WP overall-- are "propaganda" sites; that, alone, does not violate WP:RS (per section 4.7 of WP:RS)." (Note that JVL is being cited for the pro-Israel side in the writing-style of "The proponents hold that...XYZ, and their opposition holds that...ABC" -- we are NOT claiming it's a neutral source but WP:RS section 4.7 allows for this.)
Please also drop by if you have time & give your own opinion about this source's conformance to WP:RS: [ here] ~JH Robbins — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.48.252.105 ( talk) 23:32, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi Igorberger,
I saw your name on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Discrimination#Participants listing.
There is a discussion at Template talk:Infobox person#Citizenship suggesting a change of emphasis to a Citizenship entry from the Nationality entry.
The idea is to give more facilitation to Patriotism instead of Nationalism and also to allow more freedom of expression in regards to terminologies used.
Contributions are welcomed but may be worth checking last edit to check progress first :) Regards Gregkaye ( talk) 20:53, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello Igorberger,
I would just like to inquire on your status on WikiProject Computer Security as the list of WikiProject Computer Security/Members is going to be improved to list active and inactive users.
This is update is being done according to a request for comments on the WikiProject Computer Security talk page. Be sure to state your status at the User status section in the WikiProject Computer Security talk page before the end of four weeks as this will state your status as inactive in the project if not done before then.
FockeWulf FW 190 ( talk) 19:19, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 04:51, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello. I wanted to let you know that Fixuture reinstated an extremely cherry-picking POV paragraph that was rejected in February, despite there was no consensus for it, not then, not recently.-- Tribal Defender ( talk) 03:40, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
If you want to discuss The Exodus article, discuss it at Talk:The Exodus. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 16:49, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
I == I can't find any evidence your mentorship agreement, through which you escaped a ban, is rescinded ==
I'm referring to this and have asked User:John Vandenberg to comment. Meanwhile it appears to me that you are restricted to a small set of articles not including the ones you are editing. You don't know me but you can click on my userpage for more information. At the moment I'm assuming it hasn't been voided by time and is still in force. Doug Weller talk 17:25, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
The agreement dates to 2009 and User:Igorberger was mostly inactive for several years. I checked his edit history, and he only returned to Wiki-editing on 19 April, 2017. Most of his edits so far are comments on talk pages and discussions with User:Malik Shabazz. I am a bit puzzled that he does not seem to remember how to use Hyperlinks, but I guess he is a bit rusty. Dimadick ( talk) 18:05, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Doug Weller talk 19:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Igor, despite the passage of time I don't see an improvement in your editing and you are still subject to restrictions to editing. You are not complying with that restriction. The IP area does not need furthjer distructive editing and until we can be confident that you have improved you should not make any edits related to it. In face, i suggest you cease editing altogether until we work out what we are going to do. Spartaz Humbug! 05:46, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
{{db-Igorberger}}
The file File:Igorberger.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:01, 21 July 2019 (UTC)