Hi IWPCHI! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius ( I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 01:15, 23 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Julia Tutwiler Prison for Women may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Source: U.S. Department of Justice, "Investigation of the Julia Tutweiler Prison for Women and

Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Public Storage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conversion ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:53, 9 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Operation Belladonna.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  APerson ( talk!) 23:11, 20 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi IWPCHI. Along with User:CorporateM, we are having a slow edit war at Public Storage. We have explained on the talk page why the content you added and continue to replace is not suitable to include. You haven't taken on board any of our concerns. Calling us ' Wikipedia Censors' is verging towards a personal attack and is not conducive to us working together (as you said you wished to back in April). Rest assured that if there are reliable sources for negative information I will be glad to see them added to the article, but from my searches I cannot find anything suitable. The ball is in your park to provide the sources. Please take the time to discuss this further on the talk page. Thanks SmartSE ( talk) 21:35, 3 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Larisa Reisner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page My Life. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:18, 20 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scott Ritter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Butler. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 15:25, 4 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Fixed 9dec2014 IWPCHI ( talk) 08:09, 9 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alvin Stoller

added a link pointing to Russell Garcia

Paul Smith (pianist)

added a link pointing to Russell Garcia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:59, 7 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Fixed 9dec2014 IWPCHI ( talk) 08:09, 9 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Operation Belladonna, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:31, 31 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello IWPCHI. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled " Operation Belladonna".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Operation Belladonna}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 17:52, 11 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Francis La Flesche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Osage. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:44, 14 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dark Alliance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anastasio Somoza. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:27, 21 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, IWPCHI. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, IWPCHI. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "IWPCHI", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it seems to represent an organization. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. I am an administrator, and I would note that any user can in good faith report a username they see as problematic, and your use of "we" and other things seem to indicate that this name is that of an organization, which is not permitted. If this account is used by only one person, you need to change this name to indicate that; a username in the format of "YourName of IWPCHI" would be acceptable. Because you have had this name since 2012, I am giving you this opportunity to change it. 331dot ( talk) 09:04, 1 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, IWPCHI. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your work on this article. It is one of several local articles I watch.

If you are in the Minneapolis area, you may be interested in joining the Wikipedia meetup in a few weeks. Details at Wikipedia:Meetup/Minnesota.

Please take the username advice (upthread) on board; IWPCHI is an abbreviation used by a recently formed political party and as such is in technical violation of our username policy. I'm not going to make a big deal out of it myself but I would encourage you to change it before someone else does. See WP:CHU for details.

Best regards, Uninvited Company 23:45, 26 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dakota War of 1862, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Military commission ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 27 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Fire Island ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Hempstead, East Hampton, Shinnecock and Montauk

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:29, 21 March 2020 (UTC) reply

You are mentioned in a thread at WT:MED. The section is WT:MED#heads up - watchlist request. Thanks. Alexbrn ( talk) 15:27, 7 May 2020 (UTC) reply

I have been working (somewhat half-heartedly) on an article about Gottfried Müller, which are welcome to complete and contribute/submit (if you wish)?

• /info/en/?search=User:MaynardClark/Gottfried_M%C3%BCller

Best wishes, if you work on it. MaynardClark ( talk) 10:13, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Quadruple Alliance (1815), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Treaty of Paris.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:38, 13 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

I thought you left a great edit summary about deleting the absurd "Folklore" section of the Great Salem fire of 1914 article. That nonsense has bothered me for years. I started a Talk page discussion of the edit to try to get consensus before deleting it. I thought you might be willing/interested to weigh in over there. Remes ( talk) 16:44, 29 December 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1755 Cape Ann earthquake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enlightenment.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition

added a link pointing to Edward Peters

Lefèvre

added a link pointing to Hans Holbein

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:57, 20 August 2021 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Movement for a People's Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. You have been a significant contributor to it, thus why I am notifying you.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Movement for a People's Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SecretName101 ( talk) 05:26, 6 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

–– FormalDude ^talk 19:23, 6 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chloroquine. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. This primary research you added is out of date and no longer a relevant issue, as it has been widely debunked as a candidate for treating Covid-19. Do not edit war, WP:WAR - get consensus from other editors on the talk page. Zefr ( talk) 23:05, 2 June 2022 (UTC) reply

I fail to see how adding a historical section to the article on Choloroquine is "disruptive" when the entire "COVID-19 - Research" section is prefaced by "This section is an excerpt from 'Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine during the COVID-19 pandemic'." If it's OK to add that arguably off-topic entire section which treats the historical background of the controversy over the C-19 pandemic, how can it be "disruptive" to add a similar section discussing the *pre-pandemic* research specifically on chloroquine itself? Your edits are not "science-based" or based on promoting historical accuracy of the development of the controversy surrounding the use of chloroquine to treat COVID-19 but are entirely politically-based in opposition to pro-chloroquine information, period. My edit does not remove even one word of the previous version of the article; if you'd like to EDIT my contribution, go ahead but don't simply delete the entire thing. With "15 years of experience" as Wikipedia editor it should be an easy task for you; right now you're simply acting as a highly partisan censor IMO. IWPCHI ( talk) 00:20, 3 June 2022 (UTC) reply

"Do not edit war, WP:WAR - get consensus from other editors on the talk page. Zefr (talk) 23:05, 2 June 2022 (UTC)" - a noble sentiment - and one you should have followed before deleting my entire edit - twice! I never deleted a word of text that anyone else had written; I attempted to place the "COVID-19 - Research" section's emphasis on *post-pandemic research* in historical context by creating a section on *pre-pandemic research* relating SPECIFICALLY TO CHLOROQUINE - the subject of this article. I actually object to the "COVID-19 research" section as it veers off-topic to cover hydroxychloroquine as well - which Wikipedia prominently distinguishes from chloroquine in a note at the beginning of the chloroquine article: "Not to be confused with Hydroxychloroquine." Yet I refrained from deleting the section on HCQ because I'm not a censor, I'm an *editor* of Wikipedia. Put your "15 years of experience" as Wikipedia editor to work and EDIT instead of CENSORING; if you haven't got the TIME to EDIT then please refrain from censoring other editors' hard work. IWPCHI ( talk) 00:30, 3 June 2022 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sons of Liberty, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Lamb, William Wiley and George Townsend.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:04, 22 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for creating this draft. A biography on Wikipedia needs to have at least 3 reliable secondary sources to support its content. Please add more sources and re-submit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simone Évrard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary ( talk) 09:43, 13 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, IWPCHI. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Simone Évrard, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 19:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, IWPCHI. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Simone Évrard".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:12, 14 April 2023 (UTC) reply