Welcome!
Hello, Gfcvoice, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --
A Nobody
My talk 04:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk) 06:48, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Port Vila Vanuatu earthquakes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Port Vila Vanuatu earthquakes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Port Vila Vanuatu earthquakes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Diego talk 20:00, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Please see the discussion here:
- Talk:"Occupy" protests#Big confusion on what's going on -- Timeshifter ( talk) 13:11, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Fraternities and sororities in North America, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Phi Kappa and Hellenism ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:26, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Port Vila Vanuatu earthquakes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Port Vila Vanuatu earthquakes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Port Vila Vanuatu earthquakes (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dawnseeker2000 03:17, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of PFGBest
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on PFGBest requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Livit⇑ Eh?/ What? 13:23, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mondelēz International, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stride ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:06, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Government shutdown listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Government shutdown. Since you had some involvement with the Government shutdown redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Emmette Hernandez Coleman ( talk) 07:28, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
|
The Editor's Barnstar |
| Nice new stub/article at United States federal government credit-rating downgrade of 2013. Bearian ( talk) 15:09, 17 October 2013 (UTC) |
I have started a discussion on Talk:United States federal government_credit-rating downgrade regarding whether that page should have been split.
Imho your recent move of the article to United States National Debt Clock was not a good idea. Article titles are not supposed to be descriptive or overly detailed. I can see nothing in the naming criteria that would support your move. There is absolutely no need for "United States" in the title, since the clock is always and only ever called "National Debt Clock", and that is its actual name and it is fully sufficient to disambiguate the topic. Just to explain: The reason I care is that I'm the one brought the article to GA (just so that you don't think I'm just some random IP). Would you kindly revert you move? -- 85.197.31.22 ( talk) 13:23, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Since you appear to be not very active, I've decided to file a move request at the article talk page. You're very welcome to weigh in. -- 85.197.13.202 ( talk) 01:41, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- I've replied to you at the article talk page. Unfortunately, your points are entirely without any merit. I suggest you read up on our disambiguation guidelines. Even if there were another article about another debt clock, which there isn't (much less one that is also called "National Debt Clock"), this article would most certainly be the primary topic and thus not have a disambiguator in its title even then. -- 85.197.25.92 ( talk) 22:38, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-- PremalSpiegel ( talk) 10:40, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Liberbank
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Liberbank requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Christian75 ( talk) 11:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
What part of my edit was crystal ball? Sujith ( talk) 04:43, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Please refer to the talk page here: /info/en/?search=Talk:2015_Cricket_World_Cup#The_West_Indies_can_still_miss_out_on_finals_if_Pakistan_and_Ireland_have_a_tie_or_no_result Gfcvoice ( talk) 04:47, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Nick Xenophon Team is a Australian political party established by Nick Xenophon on 8 December 2014. [1] Xenophon has stated that he will field candidates in all Australian states and territories at the next federal election. [2] [3]
 | This article about politics is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
Category:Political parties in Australia Category:Political parties established in 2014
Hello Gfcvoice,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nick Xenophon Team for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju ( talk) 03:38, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Mackerras pendulum for the next Australian federal election, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Post-election pendulum for the Australian federal election, 2013. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 14:25, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello Gfcvoice,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Miriam Tolan for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone ( talk) 15:02, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Miriam Tolan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miriam Tolan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miriam Tolan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone ( talk) 13:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
See WP:RfC. μηδείς ( talk) 00:41, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Gfcvoice. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
timestamp
Hello, Gfcvoice. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Barry O'Sullivan, you may be
blocked from editing.
The Drover's Wife (
talk) 11:29, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, you accused me of "disruptive editing" and "vandalising" Wikipedia. Could you please explain why you believe this to be the case? Gfcvoice ( talk) 11:32, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
You vandalised Barry O'Sullivan for a joke. If you do it again, don't be surprised if you wind up with a block. It is not funny and it is not up for debate. The Drover's Wife ( talk) 11:38, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Your comments are quite unfortunate. Could I please ask you to review the content of Wikipedia behavioral guidelines, and the manner in which you have addressed me. Specifically, could you please assume good faith and act in a civil manner. Could you please also tone down your language and avoid using ad hominem attacks.
Separate to your conduct, your assertions that I
- "vandalised Barry O'Sullivan"
- (edited) " Barry O'Sullivan for a joke"
are simply untrue. I merely made an edit that you disagreed with. Rather than incorrectly labelling my edits as "vandalism", could you please provide an explanation as to the nature of your disagreement with my edit? Gfcvoice ( talk) 11:55, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
- Barry O'Sullivan's assertions were intended as a joke at the expense of transgender people. This is clear from even a brief reading of the available sources. While it is *possible* that you made a mistake here, that would be a very silly mistake, so I suggest you drop the grandstanding about assuming good faith.
Yaris678 (
talk) 12:21, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
- I disagree with your inference made about the intention of O'Sullivan's assertions. The inferences that you are making are not "clear" as you suggest. I stand by my earlier comment about the assumption of good faith, it's unfortunate you've labelled this as "grandstanding". Gfcvoice ( talk) 12:28, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Government shutdown (version 2) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Government shutdown (version 2). Since you had some involvement with the Government shutdown (version 2) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. B dash ( talk) 00:10, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
It may be that I have included too much detail (I seem to be the only person adding significant information) or it may be time to split the article. I am asking you because you commented eight years ago when I asked how I was doing.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:32, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Discussion here.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 15:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Yahoo! into
Yahoo! Inc. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa (
talk) 12:16, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Welcome!
Hello, Gfcvoice, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --
A Nobody
My talk 04:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk) 06:48, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Port Vila Vanuatu earthquakes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Port Vila Vanuatu earthquakes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Port Vila Vanuatu earthquakes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Diego talk 20:00, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Please see the discussion here:
- Talk:"Occupy" protests#Big confusion on what's going on -- Timeshifter ( talk) 13:11, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Fraternities and sororities in North America, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Phi Kappa and Hellenism ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:26, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Port Vila Vanuatu earthquakes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Port Vila Vanuatu earthquakes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Port Vila Vanuatu earthquakes (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dawnseeker2000 03:17, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of PFGBest
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on PFGBest requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Livit⇑ Eh?/ What? 13:23, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mondelēz International, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stride ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:06, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Government shutdown listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Government shutdown. Since you had some involvement with the Government shutdown redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Emmette Hernandez Coleman ( talk) 07:28, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
|
|
The Editor's Barnstar |
| Nice new stub/article at United States federal government credit-rating downgrade of 2013. Bearian ( talk) 15:09, 17 October 2013 (UTC) |
I have started a discussion on Talk:United States federal government_credit-rating downgrade regarding whether that page should have been split.
Imho your recent move of the article to United States National Debt Clock was not a good idea. Article titles are not supposed to be descriptive or overly detailed. I can see nothing in the naming criteria that would support your move. There is absolutely no need for "United States" in the title, since the clock is always and only ever called "National Debt Clock", and that is its actual name and it is fully sufficient to disambiguate the topic. Just to explain: The reason I care is that I'm the one brought the article to GA (just so that you don't think I'm just some random IP). Would you kindly revert you move? -- 85.197.31.22 ( talk) 13:23, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Since you appear to be not very active, I've decided to file a move request at the article talk page. You're very welcome to weigh in. -- 85.197.13.202 ( talk) 01:41, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- I've replied to you at the article talk page. Unfortunately, your points are entirely without any merit. I suggest you read up on our disambiguation guidelines. Even if there were another article about another debt clock, which there isn't (much less one that is also called "National Debt Clock"), this article would most certainly be the primary topic and thus not have a disambiguator in its title even then. -- 85.197.25.92 ( talk) 22:38, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-- PremalSpiegel ( talk) 10:40, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Liberbank
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Liberbank requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Christian75 ( talk) 11:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
What part of my edit was crystal ball? Sujith ( talk) 04:43, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Please refer to the talk page here: /info/en/?search=Talk:2015_Cricket_World_Cup#The_West_Indies_can_still_miss_out_on_finals_if_Pakistan_and_Ireland_have_a_tie_or_no_result Gfcvoice ( talk) 04:47, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Nick Xenophon Team is a Australian political party established by Nick Xenophon on 8 December 2014. [1] Xenophon has stated that he will field candidates in all Australian states and territories at the next federal election. [2] [3]
|
| This article about politics is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
Category:Political parties in Australia Category:Political parties established in 2014
Hello Gfcvoice,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nick Xenophon Team for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju ( talk) 03:38, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Mackerras pendulum for the next Australian federal election, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Post-election pendulum for the Australian federal election, 2013. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 14:25, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello Gfcvoice,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Miriam Tolan for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone ( talk) 15:02, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Miriam Tolan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miriam Tolan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miriam Tolan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone ( talk) 13:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
See WP:RfC. μηδείς ( talk) 00:41, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Gfcvoice. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
timestamp
Hello, Gfcvoice. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Barry O'Sullivan, you may be
blocked from editing.
The Drover's Wife (
talk) 11:29, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, you accused me of "disruptive editing" and "vandalising" Wikipedia. Could you please explain why you believe this to be the case? Gfcvoice ( talk) 11:32, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
You vandalised Barry O'Sullivan for a joke. If you do it again, don't be surprised if you wind up with a block. It is not funny and it is not up for debate. The Drover's Wife ( talk) 11:38, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Your comments are quite unfortunate. Could I please ask you to review the content of Wikipedia behavioral guidelines, and the manner in which you have addressed me. Specifically, could you please assume good faith and act in a civil manner. Could you please also tone down your language and avoid using ad hominem attacks.
Separate to your conduct, your assertions that I
- "vandalised Barry O'Sullivan"
- (edited) " Barry O'Sullivan for a joke"
are simply untrue. I merely made an edit that you disagreed with. Rather than incorrectly labelling my edits as "vandalism", could you please provide an explanation as to the nature of your disagreement with my edit? Gfcvoice ( talk) 11:55, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
- Barry O'Sullivan's assertions were intended as a joke at the expense of transgender people. This is clear from even a brief reading of the available sources. While it is *possible* that you made a mistake here, that would be a very silly mistake, so I suggest you drop the grandstanding about assuming good faith.
Yaris678 (
talk) 12:21, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
- I disagree with your inference made about the intention of O'Sullivan's assertions. The inferences that you are making are not "clear" as you suggest. I stand by my earlier comment about the assumption of good faith, it's unfortunate you've labelled this as "grandstanding". Gfcvoice ( talk) 12:28, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Government shutdown (version 2) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Government shutdown (version 2). Since you had some involvement with the Government shutdown (version 2) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. B dash ( talk) 00:10, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
It may be that I have included too much detail (I seem to be the only person adding significant information) or it may be time to split the article. I am asking you because you commented eight years ago when I asked how I was doing.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:32, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Discussion here.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 15:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Yahoo! into
Yahoo! Inc. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa (
talk) 12:16, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |