This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. |
Hi
Tamzin, I would like to return to Wikipedia, but first I need to better understand your rationale for banning me. You criticized me for actions that I took in an attempt to improve Wikipedia's somewhat toxic culture, and I thought that everything I was doing was well within the bounds of the policies and guidelines. You accused me of stirring drama
, but I am still unclear how editors are supposed to resolve user conduct disputes without others finding such confrontation disruptive. I hope to once again be a productive contributor to the project. —
Freoh 00:51, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Freoh ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I believe that I was mistakenly blocked. An administrator blocked me for stirring drama
and declined to explain further. My intention was and is to productively contribute to Wikipedia and encourage a civil atmosphere of collaboration. I have heeded prior advice from administrators and focused on content for the most part. Banning editors who express minority opinions simply because other editors respond with personal attacks is counterproductive. —
Freoh 13:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Accept reason:
You are only blocked from the user talk, Wikipedia, and Wikipedia talk namespaces. What edits do you need to make in those namespaces? 331dot ( talk) 13:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Freoh ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I would like to return to Wikipedia with the usual editing privileges. I hope to participate in centralized discussions such as
WP:RFA2024/I and
WP:NPOV/N. I will continue to adhere to
WP:RUCD and other relevant policies, and I will continue to adhere to the guidance that administrators have given me in the past. I still would appreciate an administrator explanation for my original ban, as it seems that there is an unwritten stirring drama
exception to the
WP:RUCD policy that should be clarified, so that future editors do not fall into the same trap. —
Freoh 01:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You don't seem to understand why you were blocked. Without understanding that, it is likely you will return to the behavior that got you blocked in the first place. You also have not edited more than a handful of times since you were blocked. That does not give us any practical evidence of what your future edits will be like. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 20:47, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Freoh ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
stirring drama, [1] [2] and in the future I can include an extra sentence designed to clarify my positive intentions, like
I say this not to attack any administrator personally, but rather to voice potential negative effects of the proposed administrative action.I can also try to make my discussions of user conduct more lighthearted using templates like {{ Trout}}. Also, I did not realize that the policy forbade removing personal attacks from the talkpages of other users, so I will refrain from doing this in the future. I would like to once again be a productive contributor to the project, but not under a badge of shame that disrupts my access to centralized discussions like WP:NPOV/N and WP:RFA2024/I. — Freoh 02:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Notes:
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I would like to return to Wikipedia with the usual editing priviliges. [[User:Tamzin|Tamzin]], I am sorry if my opposition to your administrative proposal came across as <q class="inline-quote-talk ">stirring drama</q>,
[1]
[2] and in the future I can include an extra sentence designed to clarify my positive intentions, like <q class="inline-quote-talk ">I say this not to attack any administrator personally, but rather to voice potential negative effects of the proposed administrative action.</q> I can also try to make my discussions of user conduct more lighthearted using templates like {{[[Template:Trout|Trout]]}}. Also, I did not realize that the policy forbade removing personal attacks from the talkpages of other users, so I will refrain from doing this in the future. I would like to once again be a productive contributor to the project, but not under a badge of shame that disrupts my access to centralized discussions like [[WP:NPOV/N]] and [[WP:RFA2024/I]]. — <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User talk:Freoh|Freoh]]</span> 02:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a
default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to return to Wikipedia with the usual editing priviliges. [[User:Tamzin|Tamzin]], I am sorry if my opposition to your administrative proposal came across as <q class="inline-quote-talk ">stirring drama</q>,
[1]
[2] and in the future I can include an extra sentence designed to clarify my positive intentions, like <q class="inline-quote-talk ">I say this not to attack any administrator personally, but rather to voice potential negative effects of the proposed administrative action.</q> I can also try to make my discussions of user conduct more lighthearted using templates like {{[[Template:Trout|Trout]]}}. Also, I did not realize that the policy forbade removing personal attacks from the talkpages of other users, so I will refrain from doing this in the future. I would like to once again be a productive contributor to the project, but not under a badge of shame that disrupts my access to centralized discussions like [[WP:NPOV/N]] and [[WP:RFA2024/I]]. — <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User talk:Freoh|Freoh]]</span> 02:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to return to Wikipedia with the usual editing priviliges. [[User:Tamzin|Tamzin]], I am sorry if my opposition to your administrative proposal came across as <q class="inline-quote-talk ">stirring drama</q>,
[1]
[2] and in the future I can include an extra sentence designed to clarify my positive intentions, like <q class="inline-quote-talk ">I say this not to attack any administrator personally, but rather to voice potential negative effects of the proposed administrative action.</q> I can also try to make my discussions of user conduct more lighthearted using templates like {{[[Template:Trout|Trout]]}}. Also, I did not realize that the policy forbade removing personal attacks from the talkpages of other users, so I will refrain from doing this in the future. I would like to once again be a productive contributor to the project, but not under a badge of shame that disrupts my access to centralized discussions like [[WP:NPOV/N]] and [[WP:RFA2024/I]]. — <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User talk:Freoh|Freoh]]</span> 02:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
References
This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. |
Hi
Tamzin, I would like to return to Wikipedia, but first I need to better understand your rationale for banning me. You criticized me for actions that I took in an attempt to improve Wikipedia's somewhat toxic culture, and I thought that everything I was doing was well within the bounds of the policies and guidelines. You accused me of stirring drama
, but I am still unclear how editors are supposed to resolve user conduct disputes without others finding such confrontation disruptive. I hope to once again be a productive contributor to the project. —
Freoh 00:51, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Freoh ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I believe that I was mistakenly blocked. An administrator blocked me for stirring drama
and declined to explain further. My intention was and is to productively contribute to Wikipedia and encourage a civil atmosphere of collaboration. I have heeded prior advice from administrators and focused on content for the most part. Banning editors who express minority opinions simply because other editors respond with personal attacks is counterproductive. —
Freoh 13:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Accept reason:
You are only blocked from the user talk, Wikipedia, and Wikipedia talk namespaces. What edits do you need to make in those namespaces? 331dot ( talk) 13:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Freoh ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I would like to return to Wikipedia with the usual editing privileges. I hope to participate in centralized discussions such as
WP:RFA2024/I and
WP:NPOV/N. I will continue to adhere to
WP:RUCD and other relevant policies, and I will continue to adhere to the guidance that administrators have given me in the past. I still would appreciate an administrator explanation for my original ban, as it seems that there is an unwritten stirring drama
exception to the
WP:RUCD policy that should be clarified, so that future editors do not fall into the same trap. —
Freoh 01:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You don't seem to understand why you were blocked. Without understanding that, it is likely you will return to the behavior that got you blocked in the first place. You also have not edited more than a handful of times since you were blocked. That does not give us any practical evidence of what your future edits will be like. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 20:47, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Freoh ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
stirring drama, [1] [2] and in the future I can include an extra sentence designed to clarify my positive intentions, like
I say this not to attack any administrator personally, but rather to voice potential negative effects of the proposed administrative action.I can also try to make my discussions of user conduct more lighthearted using templates like {{ Trout}}. Also, I did not realize that the policy forbade removing personal attacks from the talkpages of other users, so I will refrain from doing this in the future. I would like to once again be a productive contributor to the project, but not under a badge of shame that disrupts my access to centralized discussions like WP:NPOV/N and WP:RFA2024/I. — Freoh 02:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Notes:
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I would like to return to Wikipedia with the usual editing priviliges. [[User:Tamzin|Tamzin]], I am sorry if my opposition to your administrative proposal came across as <q class="inline-quote-talk ">stirring drama</q>,
[1]
[2] and in the future I can include an extra sentence designed to clarify my positive intentions, like <q class="inline-quote-talk ">I say this not to attack any administrator personally, but rather to voice potential negative effects of the proposed administrative action.</q> I can also try to make my discussions of user conduct more lighthearted using templates like {{[[Template:Trout|Trout]]}}. Also, I did not realize that the policy forbade removing personal attacks from the talkpages of other users, so I will refrain from doing this in the future. I would like to once again be a productive contributor to the project, but not under a badge of shame that disrupts my access to centralized discussions like [[WP:NPOV/N]] and [[WP:RFA2024/I]]. — <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User talk:Freoh|Freoh]]</span> 02:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a
default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to return to Wikipedia with the usual editing priviliges. [[User:Tamzin|Tamzin]], I am sorry if my opposition to your administrative proposal came across as <q class="inline-quote-talk ">stirring drama</q>,
[1]
[2] and in the future I can include an extra sentence designed to clarify my positive intentions, like <q class="inline-quote-talk ">I say this not to attack any administrator personally, but rather to voice potential negative effects of the proposed administrative action.</q> I can also try to make my discussions of user conduct more lighthearted using templates like {{[[Template:Trout|Trout]]}}. Also, I did not realize that the policy forbade removing personal attacks from the talkpages of other users, so I will refrain from doing this in the future. I would like to once again be a productive contributor to the project, but not under a badge of shame that disrupts my access to centralized discussions like [[WP:NPOV/N]] and [[WP:RFA2024/I]]. — <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User talk:Freoh|Freoh]]</span> 02:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to return to Wikipedia with the usual editing priviliges. [[User:Tamzin|Tamzin]], I am sorry if my opposition to your administrative proposal came across as <q class="inline-quote-talk ">stirring drama</q>,
[1]
[2] and in the future I can include an extra sentence designed to clarify my positive intentions, like <q class="inline-quote-talk ">I say this not to attack any administrator personally, but rather to voice potential negative effects of the proposed administrative action.</q> I can also try to make my discussions of user conduct more lighthearted using templates like {{[[Template:Trout|Trout]]}}. Also, I did not realize that the policy forbade removing personal attacks from the talkpages of other users, so I will refrain from doing this in the future. I would like to once again be a productive contributor to the project, but not under a badge of shame that disrupts my access to centralized discussions like [[WP:NPOV/N]] and [[WP:RFA2024/I]]. — <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User talk:Freoh|Freoh]]</span> 02:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
References