Hi Dadylasry! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! — Bagumba ( talk) 20:59, 6 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Thank you for teaching me! Dadylasry ( talk) 21:48, 6 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Alex Lasry, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically for AIPAC, we generally expand acronyms on first use per MOS:ACRO1STUSE, and in this case it's never referred to again anyways, so doesn't seem to need mention. — Bagumba ( talk) 05:16, 8 June 2022 (UTC) reply

@Bagumba Thank you, I thought of make it appear shorter but after seeing instruction I think it is confusing and unnecessary. Dadylasry ( talk) 05:19, 8 June 2022 (UTC) reply

@Bagumba Besides,I want to ask you if this understandiing is right: If something is not a country or famous international organization then always use expand acronyms when something occur for the first come on a page and only use initialism when it occur repeatedly. Dadylasry ( talk) 05:26, 8 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Yes, you got the gist of it. I'm usually wary of "always", because there's always an exception lurking ( WP:IAR). "Generally" is more accurate. — Bagumba ( talk) 05:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC) reply

@Bagumba Can you go back to the deletion discussion page of article Alex Lasry to help refute pro delete comments here? Fightagainstdarkmoney ( talk) 21:02, 11 June 2022 (UTC) reply

I think my earlier comments are still sufficient. Be aware of Wikipedia:Don't bludgeon the process. Also, there a guideline about canvassing. Regards. — Bagumba ( talk) 01:41, 12 June 2022 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fightagainstdarkmoney. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   GeneralNotability ( talk) 02:06, 12 June 2022 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Geeky1127 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Geeky1127. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   GeneralNotability ( talk) 02:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC) reply