Hi, this is my talk pages. Post any questions below
Thanks for uploading File:CreationEngineLogo610.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:37, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Please do not add
unsourced
personal observations or speculation on pop cultural references to articles, as you did with
this edit to I Should Have Never Gone Ziplining, as this violates Wikipedia's policies of
Verifiability,
No Original Research, and
WP:SYNTH. Wikipedia requires that all material added to articles be accompanied by
reliable,
verifiable sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an
inline citation, which you can learn to make
here. With regard to material about the content of fiction that is evaluative, analytical or interpretive, the source must be a
secondary source, and it must explicitly mention the information in relation to the work in question. Relying instead on personal observation or interpretation is
original research, and using sources to form original conclusions not explicitly in those sources is
synthesis, which is a form of original research.
Also, please remember that this is an encyclopedia, not a message board. If you can't be bothered to start a sentence with a capital letter or place a punctuation mark at the end of it, then you may want to consider whether you're qualified to edit here. Nightscream ( talk) 03:03, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello. Your recent edit to
1993 appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list
should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's
notability guideline. Thank you.
General Ization
Talk 17:31, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, this is my talk pages. Post any questions below
Thanks for uploading File:CreationEngineLogo610.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:37, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Please do not add
unsourced
personal observations or speculation on pop cultural references to articles, as you did with
this edit to I Should Have Never Gone Ziplining, as this violates Wikipedia's policies of
Verifiability,
No Original Research, and
WP:SYNTH. Wikipedia requires that all material added to articles be accompanied by
reliable,
verifiable sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an
inline citation, which you can learn to make
here. With regard to material about the content of fiction that is evaluative, analytical or interpretive, the source must be a
secondary source, and it must explicitly mention the information in relation to the work in question. Relying instead on personal observation or interpretation is
original research, and using sources to form original conclusions not explicitly in those sources is
synthesis, which is a form of original research.
Also, please remember that this is an encyclopedia, not a message board. If you can't be bothered to start a sentence with a capital letter or place a punctuation mark at the end of it, then you may want to consider whether you're qualified to edit here. Nightscream ( talk) 03:03, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello. Your recent edit to
1993 appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list
should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's
notability guideline. Thank you.
General Ization
Talk 17:31, 21 September 2018 (UTC)