Hello! EducationHoM,
you are invited to the
Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!
|
I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch ( talk) 23:16, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm JRPG. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Peter Birkett seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Hello - thank you for your message. I am EducationHoM and appreciate your comments, however the edit you have made talks mainly about a period post Pete Birketts time at this organisation. The page should give a balanced overview of Pete Birkett, both the achievements made during his leadership and for context also a mention of the investigation post this period. The edits you have made speak in the main of the report rather than the subject Pete Birkett. I think by reintroducing some of my edit and also a small reduction in the content on the investigation outcomes this could be achieved. Thank you.
Thank you also for your reply. I would appreciate your assistance on getting this page more balanced than it currently stands - agree it should be neutral and give a greater context of the subject 'Pete Birkett'. I shall endeavour to investigate the additional info you mention and should then like to see if together we can get this page more rounded. I do not work for this organisation I am just interested (through employment in this industry for the last 5 years) in education success stories and achievers in this arena. Look forward to hearing from you. Many thanks EducationHoM EducationHoM ( talk) 09:02, 16 June 2015 (UTC)EducationHoM
JRPG has raised some (IMO valid) concerns regarding your "enthusiastic" editing of the Birkett article. I encourage you to reply on the article talk page lest this ends up at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard or some similarly delightful place. Favonian ( talk) 20:25, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello! EducationHoM,
you are invited to the
Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!
|
I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch ( talk) 23:16, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm JRPG. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Peter Birkett seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Hello - thank you for your message. I am EducationHoM and appreciate your comments, however the edit you have made talks mainly about a period post Pete Birketts time at this organisation. The page should give a balanced overview of Pete Birkett, both the achievements made during his leadership and for context also a mention of the investigation post this period. The edits you have made speak in the main of the report rather than the subject Pete Birkett. I think by reintroducing some of my edit and also a small reduction in the content on the investigation outcomes this could be achieved. Thank you.
Thank you also for your reply. I would appreciate your assistance on getting this page more balanced than it currently stands - agree it should be neutral and give a greater context of the subject 'Pete Birkett'. I shall endeavour to investigate the additional info you mention and should then like to see if together we can get this page more rounded. I do not work for this organisation I am just interested (through employment in this industry for the last 5 years) in education success stories and achievers in this arena. Look forward to hearing from you. Many thanks EducationHoM EducationHoM ( talk) 09:02, 16 June 2015 (UTC)EducationHoM
JRPG has raised some (IMO valid) concerns regarding your "enthusiastic" editing of the Birkett article. I encourage you to reply on the article talk page lest this ends up at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard or some similarly delightful place. Favonian ( talk) 20:25, 13 June 2015 (UTC)