Hi. When you recently edited Results of the 2012 Republican Party presidential primaries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jon Huntsman ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:03, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
You wrote on your edit summary: "Missouri holds a primary then a caucus. Just because the full results from the caucus haven't come in yet doesn't mean that the primary results supersede them."
There will never be results from the presidential preference of the caucuses. That's because there were no straw polls, at least none acknowledged by the Missouri GOP. To quote the party: "“Unlike many other caucus states, there will not be a straw poll attached to the caucus,” the memo said. “Caucus-goers will be voting for delegates, and with few exceptions, these delegates will not be bound to a particular candidate. Because there is no vote on candidate preference, neither the Missouri GOP nor any election authority will have or release any data regarding the ‘winner’ of the caucuses.”" [1] The February primary was the only presidential preference poll with official recognition from the state party. As the party itself says, there will never be official data of the "winner" of the caucuses. So either we use the primary data or leave Missouri as grey forever. More discussion here and here. Also note that in the state map Missouri is no longer striped so there's precedence as well. -- 89.27.36.41 ( talk) 20:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
.png#Missouri){kind=link}
| Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited | |
|---|---|
 |
Yours, Maximilianklein ( talk) 04:18, 1 December 2012 (UTC) |
There is a Request for Comment now live on the Template talk:User WikiProject United States presidential elections. Your involvement in WikiProject means you may wish to consider commenting on your preferred outcome for this userbox. Spartan7W § 19:21, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Results of the 2012 Republican Party presidential primaries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jon Huntsman ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:03, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
You wrote on your edit summary: "Missouri holds a primary then a caucus. Just because the full results from the caucus haven't come in yet doesn't mean that the primary results supersede them."
There will never be results from the presidential preference of the caucuses. That's because there were no straw polls, at least none acknowledged by the Missouri GOP. To quote the party: "“Unlike many other caucus states, there will not be a straw poll attached to the caucus,” the memo said. “Caucus-goers will be voting for delegates, and with few exceptions, these delegates will not be bound to a particular candidate. Because there is no vote on candidate preference, neither the Missouri GOP nor any election authority will have or release any data regarding the ‘winner’ of the caucuses.”" [1] The February primary was the only presidential preference poll with official recognition from the state party. As the party itself says, there will never be official data of the "winner" of the caucuses. So either we use the primary data or leave Missouri as grey forever. More discussion here and here. Also note that in the state map Missouri is no longer striped so there's precedence as well. -- 89.27.36.41 ( talk) 20:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
| Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited | |
|---|---|
|
Yours, Maximilianklein ( talk) 04:18, 1 December 2012 (UTC) |
There is a Request for Comment now live on the Template talk:User WikiProject United States presidential elections. Your involvement in WikiProject means you may wish to consider commenting on your preferred outcome for this userbox. Spartan7W § 19:21, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)